Voodoomelon wrote: » However you can see little areas where it falls down, like in 1:07 in that video. You wouldn't see that on a Merc/BMW/Audi.
unkel wrote: » https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzsDvLhzD-A
beetlebailey wrote: » WOW...Reading these posts I`m amazed at how excited some people are about the prospect of owning a Skoda.:rolleyes: And as for parting with 29k for the privillage:eek: 'its a cheap volkswagen\audi' ,who are you trying to convince? Oh and I`m no badge snob, I drive a crappy Almera ffs! but atleast I`m under no illusion about it.:D
TomMc wrote: » People are forgetting that Skoda's are cheap and cheerful workhorse vehicles
Longshanks100 wrote: » Im not dying about the saloon, but the estate could really grow on me - especially after it was pimped
VolvoMan wrote: » Just looking there, the 3.6 V6 looks extraordinary value for money if you can live with the 2k a year road tax.
Longshanks100 wrote: » quick 5 minute job
unkel wrote: » And it even parks itself :eek:
Padraig Mor wrote: » I actually don't know how Skoda managed to design this thing! More leg room than a long wheelbase Jaguar XJ (according to Parker's) and the biggest boot - well, pretty much ever. And yet, it's no longer than a 5 series. It just doesn't add up!
Matt Simis wrote: » The Estate absolutely looks better indeed, Saloon isnt too bad though. Now bear with me, but I think it could be modded via aftermarket to look far far nicer. Some wider bigger wheels and slightly lowerer, blacked out rear taillights on the boot area only etc. Also needs meatier engines.
Confab wrote: » The estate is much better looking but the saloon is still fantastic. OP, did you get it with DSG? Manual in that thing would be a travesty!
flamegrill wrote: » It actually was. By the time I got the 160PS engine, Sat Nav, Bluetooth (900 euro!!!) and the other bits that I wanted that come as standard on the Skoda it was 4500 euro dearer than the Skoda. The hatch-back insignia which I drove 3 times on separate occasions before choosing the skoda was a very nice car. I just didn't like the rear view window. The view out the back is terrible, almost like driving a van. I had to consider my partner who is a learner driver when choosing aswell as it's "our car" and she wouldn't have managed it. As the skoda drives similarly to my existing 06 passat it was the way to go. I didn't choose it just for the boot there was other issues aswell we took into consideration. Both have adaptive front lighting which is a nice touch. The Opel has Opel eye which doesn't work in Ireland. What a pointless feature. Paul
pburns wrote: » Yeah, this Skoda worship is getting a bit OTT.
colm_mcm wrote: » Even if they got rid of those lights on the boot door it'd look so much better, as it is they don't quite match up. AFTER
Tea 1000 wrote: » It's not 4500 cheaper if you go for a more comparable engine in the Superb. More like around 2k or there abouts. You get more space and park assist in the Superb, and you get a nicer interior and better driving dynamics in the Insignia. So there's more to think about than a dual boot, which, if I chose a hatch-back Insignia, I wouldn't ever miss. You'd swear that Skoda are after bringing out a Bently Continental GT for €12,000 the way some people are reacting! It's a comfortable, well-spec'd car for an excellent price, but lets not get carried away here!