Rickyroma wrote: » Yep - we were told that while different texts will use different definitions (esp. re ratios) we should always look on Ward as definitive.
Masjanja wrote: » Ke = 18.45% Pref.Shares = 5% Kd = 8% Redeemable = 12.46% WACC = 15.44% Guys dont foreget to apply tax at all times!
John_P_C wrote: » lol! ye me too! Some xmas this is! For the WACC part of the question; I was wondering will they ask us the impact of the three financing options on the company's share price and gearing etc. Not sure will it be a straight forward WACC question?
flashtash wrote: » thats what I did too. here are my calcs (briefly!) Ke=(0.25(1+.1199)/4.20)+0.1199 = 18.65% Kp=0.3/6 =5% Kd=8(1-.2)/80 =8% Redeem Deb: NPV5% NPV10% IRR Y0 97 97 Y1+2 (13-2.6) 1.859 (19.33) 1.736 (18.05) Y2 (100) 0.907 (90.7) 0.826 (82.6) Totals: -13.03 -3.65 IRR= 0.05 + (-13.03(0.05))/(-13.03+3.65) =11.95% WACC MV % Cost Total Issued 1000mill 52% 18.65% 9.698 Pref 200 mill 10% 5% 0.5 Irred 440 mill 23 8% 1.84 Redeem 290 mill 15 11.95 % 1.79 WACC=13.828 Anyone else agree/disagree?
MAX72 wrote: » I think you may need to look at some of your MVs Ordinary share 2,100 ie 4.20 x 500 (not 1000 thats book value) Pref 240 ie 6 x 40 (not 200 thats book value) Irred 400 (not 440 as that includes interest) Redeem 290 (thats what I used) Would like an opinion on this..........
MAX72 wrote: » The costings of the new machine Point 1 -10000 Point 2 25000 Point 3 170000 Point 4 0 Point 5 60000 Point 6 8000 Point 7 18000 Point 8 0 Point 9 25000 Point 10 0 Overall cost 296000 Would appreciate your comments
flashtash wrote: » You forgot the 16000 for the unskilled labour (Point 5) and the var o/h should be 12000 (600 hours total). What you think?
flashtash wrote: » Appreciate that Max. I wasn't sure of the MV's. I was using the 1000 for the Ord Share so that was my main confusion. The other figures you used were the same as mine (I've since corrected the others from what I posted first). My WACC is now 15.54%. My Redeem Debs are only 12.6% v your 13.7%.
s.m.c wrote: » My answer for the WACC is as follows: Ordinary Shares 18.65% Pref Shares 5% Irredeemable Debentures 8% Redeemable Debentures 12.11% WACC 15.51% There seems to be differences in the figures for redeemable debenturesMy workings were as follows: Year cashflow discount(5%) PV Discount(10%) PV 0 96.66 1 96.66 1 96.66 1-2 (13(1-.20)) 1.859 (19.33) 1.735 (18.04) 2 100 .907 (90.7) .826 (82.6) PV of (13.37) and (3.98) Kd = 5 + 13.37(5)/9.39 Kd = 5 + 7.119 Kd = 12.11%My workings for WACC are: 2100(18.7%)/2100+240+400+290 + 240(5%)/3030 + 400(8%)/3030 + 290(12.11%)/3030 =15.51% Anyone Agree/Disagree with this?
Coldplayer wrote: » Guys for the second point on Material FG Is it not just the scrap value that we use. If you look at the wording it says "could have been used" not "could be used" as a replacement material for another contract. The opportunity to plug it in at €5 per kg is gone surely?/
martina16b wrote: » Hi there I am new to this was just wondering If you know how they will bring in the three sources of finance on last page of case study into the WACC . Will we have to work out each individually using the WACC.
tywy wrote: » That should be -10,000 for material CX because they're saving the cost of disposal if the project goes ahead... For material FG, that should be €20,000 replacement cost because they will get a scrap value of €1 per kg if the project goes ahead... so the replacement cost is €4 per kg. For the unskilled labour... the contribution per hour is worked out using the hourly rate so you just used the contribution to calculate it... So it should be €60,000.
eoin99 wrote: » I've calculated an updated WACC for each scenario: 1. 14.21% 2. 15.82% 3. 15.86% Anyone else calculated these & got similar answers? ( I was working off 15.55% as my original WACC) On the theory side I suppose you could be asked the pro's/con's of each, issuing shares/increasing debt. Any other suggestions?