Pushtrak wrote: » I presume that any banning he'd get is a slap on the wrist.
davyjose wrote: » Man, your Casual Fridays are AWESOME!!!!
Pushtrak wrote: » Thats good advice, but be careful. Get too many to say something and it'll be suspicious. Yer one will figure out it was said back to you. You don't get people individually getting a conscience like that. Maybe get as many to do it as one collective group. That'd make it less supsicious. As if they had a chance to talk about it. I'm a devious one, me.
mia1 wrote: » Yea I thought those that I considered good friends would have tried to put a halt to the rumours, instead they didn't even inform me of them so I could put things right.
tudlytops wrote: » I'm as direct as they come, so I would simple say, these guys here say that you said this about me, what have you got to say? simple no messing about.
Richard Dower wrote: » get to the motivation behind the rumour....expose that and you'll expose in person in question.
Richard Dower wrote: » Yeah but what was "blown out of porportion"?, did you blow three guys at the Xmas office party while photocopying yer vag and handing out prints to staffers? Or did you snog one guy and he told everyone you shagged....too many variables!
mia1 wrote: » Yeah so am I and that's why that fact people are taking behind my back is hurting me so much I think. The thing is the people that confirmed who told them told me in confidence and wouldn't want me to reveal who told me! I suppose without that backing it would be difficult to confront them, I'm scared they'll just deny it and I'll be left standing there like a looney and those who didn't hear the rumour in the 1st place will want to know what I was accusing them of..... I really just don't want them to get away with it!
Pushtrak wrote: » Then, I hope the screen name you are using is a pseudonym. Not doing so would be relatively noobish. (Maybe I just have paranoid tendencies.)
mia1 wrote: » Well it was more similar to the second situation:p As i said I work in an office and spend half my time on Boards so no doubt others there do too so I can't say exactly what the situation was sorry.
tudlytops wrote: » So we back to the can you be 100% sure, if they aren't willing to back you up, maybe the roumer is about the other person. Maybe the real roumer is that they are saying stuff about you, and the reason they would not back you up its because it isn't true. Hope it made sense This is why i don't lessen to gossip, ever.
tudlytops wrote: » Half you time on bards, can i have a job like yours
Pushtrak wrote: » Just please, don't tell us if it involved another girl and a cup. Thanks.
mia1 wrote: » Even the rumour wasn't THAT bad, thankfully!:p I think I made it pretty clear what actually happened, it was no biggie to most people and anyone who would judge me on it can go get a life. It's what was added to the story that people may now believe is what is upsetting me and it's something I ain't willing to share on here, sorry!
Nervous Wreck wrote: » Everyone in work thinks I'm riding my boss purple monkey dishwasher.
tudlytops wrote: » In that case go to work get up in front of everyone and out them right, end of roumer. You did say you were a direct personBt the way I'm not spelling roumer right am I?
davyjose wrote: » Another girl and a cup?
Richard Dower wrote: » She shagged some guy at work, then he added his own twist....simples.
mia1 wrote: » Yea I know that's what I would normally do, it's just it's such an embarrasing rumour I don't know if I'll have the confidence to do it in front of other people, suppose I have a few days to prepare myself for it now. and no....you're also not spelling "by" right either:p
mia1 wrote: » Hey guys, I just found out that someone who I don't even know at work has been spreading a story about me. I have a feeling they heard about the situation 3rd or 4th hand outside of work and as stories go someone along the line added in their own bit to make the gossip more juicy. Did this ever happen to you? What did you do? Any advice on what I should do?
