partyatmygaff wrote: » The better solution would be to open secular schools that teach about all religions (This is the case for all secondary schools at the moment with JC religion). Secular Primary schools that taught children about major world religions just as secondary school religion would be suitable in todays Ireland. That is not to say denominational schools should be shut down e.t.c. but they should co-exist and choice should be available.
louisa200 wrote: » I am sorry my number nine post seemed for some to bring down proceedings, however I have three children, and I have a legal obligation to send them to school, and the state should have a legal obligation to eductate my children, minus religion... Educate together can do it.... No church should have an influence on schooling imo... faith should be learned from church and home, not school........... school should be about learning everything, not just one thing, and pushing it and pushing it and pushing it... my son says the lords prayer three times an ffin day.. wtf is that teaching him????? The Catholic church should have nothing to do with the eductaion of our children.. and should not be funded by the state to do so, it is fundamentally wrong............
o1s1n wrote: » OR Don't teach religion at all and leave it up to the people who should be responsible for teaching it? (Parents/priests/shaman/whatever) I'd go one further and say children shouldn't be exposed to religion at all. But will leave that for another day :pac:
partyatmygaff wrote: » Just send in a note saying you do not want him to participate in religious activities of any kind.
partyatmygaff wrote: » So children of those indifferent to religion should grow up completely unaware of any religions? That does not bode well for tolerance.
o1s1n wrote: » The main point being though, he shouldn't have to. My parents sent in such a note for me yet I was still hounded by the chaplain and teachers to go to the masses. Had a pretty major altercation with one of them when I refused to go and there was nobody to stay back and monitor the 'heathen non christian kids'. Neither of us should have been put in that position.
o1s1n wrote: » Parents who wish to raise their children indifferent to religion should have the same rights to do so as parents who wish to raise their children in a religion.
partyatmygaff wrote: » Yes if there was a secular school available that taught of all world religions it would have suited you better. Yes but what is wrong with learning about all the world religions in a secular school?
CONSTITUTION OF IRELAND – BUNREACHT NA hÉIREANN CONSTITUTION OF IRELAND In the Name of the Most Holy Trinity, from Whom is all authority and to Whom, as our final end, all actions both of men and States must be referred,We, the people of Éire, Humbly acknowledging all our obligations to our Divine Lord, Jesus Christ, Who sustained our fathers through centuries of trial, Gratefully remembering their heroic and unremitting struggle to regain the rightful independence of our Nation, And seeking to promote the common good, with due observance of Prudence, Justice and Charity, so that the dignity and freedom of the individual may be assured, true social order attained, the unity of our country restored, and concord established with other nations, Do hereby adopt, enact, and give to ourselves this Constitution.
partyatmygaff wrote: » Yes but what is wrong with learning about all the world religions in a secular school?
louisa200 wrote: » I am sorry my number nine post seemed for some to bring down proceedings, however I have three children, and I have a legal obligation to send them to school,
louisa200 wrote: » and the state should have a legal obligation to eductate my children, minus religion...
louisa200 wrote: » Educate together can do it....
louisa200 wrote: » No church should have an influence on schooling imo... faith should be learned from church and home, not school........... school should be about learning everything, not just one thing, and pushing it and pushing it and pushing it... my son says the lords prayer three times an ffin day.. wtf is that teaching him????? The Catholic church should have nothing to do with the eductaion of our children.. and should not be funded by the state to do so, it is fundamentally wrong............
Jakkass wrote: » ^^ What relevance does that have to the working of peoples lives? I mean why is that so urgent to go rather than the issues that people have concerning matters in day to day life?
Thaedydal wrote: » The state funds all school the same but refused to take on the patronage/responsibility of the schools and I agree to have 3,000 of the 3,200 primary school having crucifixes in them daily prayers and art and other subjects laced with christian religious teaching is frankly wrong in this day and age.
Biggins wrote: » "Educate Together" schools - best thing in Irish education today!
mikemac wrote: » Hadn't heard of this before. Had a quick look at the list, there are over a dozen counties represented there, some in rural(ish) areas. So it's not just a city thing Seems to be expanding anyway.
jumpguy wrote: » Because you don't. In a secular school, you're more likely to learn about the religion the school is owned by. In my catholic primary school (which I liked very much, and I never cared about the religion that owned it at the time) we only learned about Christianity in religion class. I didn't mind that...but there was no other world religions talked about.
Biggins wrote: » Two of my four kids now are going to a non religion based school (the other two not old enough yet). They meet ALL races and nationalities. They get to meet them as people irrespective of religion, skin colour or language. They get to like them as human beings not a religious status painted on them from the start. What is so wrong with that??? It ruddy bodes VERY well for tolerance! They get to know the person from the beginning - not the automatic typecast!Absolutely!
Jakkass wrote: » I wouldn't say that it is wrong, but there should be adequate alternatives. It's certainly never wrong to teach a child about religion if it is agreed to by parents irrespective of what "day and age" it is. I especially don't get what on earth is offensive about crucifixes, and the latest EU ruling concerning Italy is utter lunacy. I don't remember any as I was being educated, but I don't see what the big deal is.
A devastating combination of nature and neglect flattened the city of LAquila, Italy.
partyatmygaff wrote: » The more educated you are of other religions the less likely it is you will be intolerant of other religions (Or lack of religion).
dvpower wrote: » There is a big difference between teaching children about religion and teaching children that one particular religion is the right one. Of course its the right of parents to teach their children that a particular religion is the right one; the question is, should our state education system promote this?
Manach wrote: » Instead we should have a pledges of alligences to the state, and images of our leaders in the classroom? No thanks, the state seems to gathering too much power to regulate as is.
Biggins wrote: » I disagree. The more educated you are about the person - not the religion - you more less you are likely to be quicker to typecast them then into a "class" later and see it then as just bad. My kids see the person first - not the religious base or face first!
partyatmygaff wrote: » Your children might as you are a good parent. Not everyone is a good parent and may judge people by religion/class e.t.c rather than character. But what exactly is the issue with teaching children religion as it is done in the JC for example? You learn about all the world religions, morality, basic philosphy and the meaning of views such as humanism, secularism, atheism and agnosticism e.t.c.? What is the harm in that?
Thaedydal wrote: » Nope you don't have to send them to school, you have legal obligation to educate them and the constitution says parents are the primary teachers of children and as long as the kids pass the dept of eduction's tests each year you are totally entitled to home school them. And the state is in breach of UN directives on this. The state funds all school the same but refused to take on the patronage/responsibility of the schools and I agree to have 3,000 of the 3,200 primary school having crucifixes in them daily prayers and art and other subjects laced with christian religious teaching is frankly wrong in this day and age.