t0mm wrote: » It won't happen anyway cos it would take most of the convenience out of the Dublin bikes. Noone is goin to carry a helmet around town, and it's not like they can give you a helmet when you take your bike.
Gavin wrote: » It's just the sort of thing a politician would love to implement. Imagine saving all those lives, and garnering all those votes, with a swipe of the pen!
tomasrojo wrote: » Very true. In fact, I think it's the Dublin Bike scheme that has sparked this flurry of interest in helmet laws again.
Lumen wrote: » If the rumours are true, this is certainly not the kind of scientifically rigorous and bipartisan examination of issues I've come to expect of The Afternoon Show. I shocked, just shocked. I may even write in to The Metro to express my outrage.
John Cleese wrote: Yes, well, that's the sort of blinkered, philistine pig ignorance I've come to expect from you non-creative garbage. You sit there on your loathsome, spotty behinds squeezing blackheads, not caring a tinker's cuss for the struggling artist. You excrement! You whining, hypocritical toadies, with your colour TV sets and your Tony Jacklin golf clubs and your bleeding Masonic secret handshakes! You wouldn't let me join, would you, you blackballing bastards! Well, I wouldn't become a freemason now if you went down on your lousy, stinking knees and begged me!
tomasrojo wrote: » now have deciced to run a survey of their listeners on the subject.
kincsem wrote: » These numbers I made up would satisfy the above "statistics".
Bunnyhopper wrote: » And 67.42% of statistics on the internet are just made up on the spot.
kincsem wrote: » Bicycling About 75% of all bicyclists who die each year die of head injuries. 85% of head injuries in bicycle accidents can be prevented by wearing a helmet. [/COLOR] [...] I don't know how they say "85% can be prevented". That is guesswork.
TheJones wrote: » Ah RTE current affairs, Between tiger kidnappings, the decline of Irish society, AIB pay scales and the threat of public service strike action does anybody really care about the opinions of the overpaid and intellectually disabled presenters of the news challenged Afternoon Show who in their defence are only trying to compete with their ancestral 'Live at Three' for the title of most useless television show in public service broadcasting. Don't anyone dare complaining by letting these loosers have their say about the importance of implementing their helmet legislation, by allowing them airtime on this terrible show we can all be relieved in the knowledge that no right minded person will be tuning in to hear about it!
jerseyeire wrote: » I was just thiking, people who watch the afternoon show are usually at home, in the afternoon. Now, I would imagine that 99% of bicycle users would be at work, school/college, taking advantage of limited light etc...... Basically what I'm getting at, the afternoon show is for the elderly and parents, even during my unemployed period I didn't watch it. In summary who actually cares what they have to say. They post what the presenters wear on the site:"Today Maura is wearing dark blue jeans from Topshop, Black shoes from Karen Millen, Black top with floral design from Ted Baker and Black shrug from All Saints.Sheana is wearing a navy and black striped dress from Whistles and shoes from Karen Millen."
DirkVoodoo wrote: » Raam looks a bit like Kenny Cunninham there, they make the same faces when talking!