Cabaal wrote: » If the public sector ain't careful they'll have the IMF come in and they won't know what it them if they do come in.
If the Government hasn’t the capacity to do what’s needed, then others will come in, like the IMF, and overnight they will make decisions. The IMF’s solutions would be much more severe: They will immediately start cutting expenditure by maybe 30% or 40% — that is a fact.
baronflyguy wrote: » I dont think many people understand we are borrowing over 400 million a week to pay public sector services and jobs. The IMF will come in with an iron fist if they don't see that borrowing stopped soon.
I think the Unions should be trying to convince their members that change is needed to salaries. Personally I think it should be a staggered salary cut. for example, someone in the public sector under say 25k shouldn't be affected. RTE did something similar to this to their staff and i thought it was a good way of protecting staff on low wages.
baronflyguy wrote: » Bringing it back to a waterford related topic, I think it would be bad for business if the city is disrupted on friday. The taxi disruption was a disaster PR for them and only made people angry at the way they interrupted normal business. I have yet to meet anyone who supported the 'action' of the last taxi strike in the city.
Mr Goon wrote: » Nobody is going on strike this friday to the best of my knowledge. It's a day of protest and the unions have asked those that can organise time off/have the day off to support it. Those that are in work will continue to work. My understanding is that services will not be affected, certainly not in the area I am in anyway.
baronflyguy wrote: » Do you know what time it is scheduled for and the route it will be taking? I just don't want to be near the city centre and stuck in traffic.
soldering iron wrote: » If we as workers want to hurt this goverment then we ALL have to down tool and stay out untill a fairer systm is found.
baronflyguy wrote: » How about voting at the ballot box?
soldering iron wrote: » When the Lisbon treaty was rejected in a matter of days the government of this country decided to rerun the election, in the mean time they have made a complete cock up of this country, but will the rerun the national election NO. This government need to be brought down by the people for the people
Cabaal wrote: » Thanks you've just confirmed that atleast your reasons for striking are purely revenge, nice! :rolleyes: As I've said before this of all the reasons in the world is the most foolish reason for wanting to do something like this.
Psychedelic wrote: » Hang on a sec....this march on the 6th is about protesting against pay cuts to public sector workers, nothing to do with bringing down the Government.
deise blue wrote: » This march is to protest about Government cutbacks generally including any cuts to social welfare such as dole payments and children's allowance. It is not only about cuts to public sector pay.
Cabaal wrote: » Actually the march is the public sector protesting about job cuts and pay cuts that will affect them (remember we pay them), now the public sector is trying to swing it so the march is also about the private sector but in reality it is not. Sadly the dole must be cut the same as the public sector pay bill must be cut, further to this jobs must go in the public sector. We all know that very few people that are unemployed came from the public sector.
deise blue wrote: » You are wrong , the march is to give people from all sectors of society an opportunity to protest against the government's mooted cuts whether they be cuts to jobs , pay , welfare , children's allowance etc. I'm in the private sector and will be meeting with other colleagues so that we can attend the march together
Cabaal wrote: » I'm curious to what you think is a solution to cuts and the huge amount of money that the goverment is overspending each day, - If the Gov ups taxes you'll march - If the gov cuts payouts for stuff you'll march - If the gov does job cuts you'll march So what is the solution that you will accept? The current situation can not continue for the long term and that should be obvious to anyone, sadly hard decisions have to be made and this isn't just the gov saying this this is the OECD and the EU. If you don't want higher taxes, job cuts and benefit cuts then fine march away and strike all you want and we'll wait for the IMF and they'll we'll all suffer like nothing experienced before.
deise blue wrote: » You should never work on assumption ! I have absolutely no problem with higher taxes , property tax , wealth tax and an increase in capital gains tax to 40%, ....
deise blue wrote: » Talking about the OECD report did you see where they said we have a smaller public service sector than most of the EU15 countries ? The OECD also recommend that the tax position needs to be reconfigured. I for one have no problem in paying increased taxes until we get out of our difficulties.
deise blue wrote: » Anyway must sign off now - off to the march !
deise blue wrote: » if the general presumption is that the public sector workers earn more then with an equitable tax system they will pay more.
Cabaal wrote: » I don't presume the public sector is paid more, my problem with the public sector is the fact that poor performers in the sector stay for life and get their pay increases anyway. I've seen it happen, people that can't be fired due to their contracts...its insane. In addition to this alot of people in the sector see the sick days as extra holidays, thats never right.