whycliff wrote: » becasue you thought of it and typed it, your speculating. Agreeing with released Statement from anyone or Anything other than the coroner is speculation. At this stage, his own family maybe only speculating.
whycliff wrote: » Giving examples is speculating my friend....
drkpower wrote: » Your position gets flimsier and flimsier. Speculation is a consideration of reasonable alternatives. I was clearly and transparently pointing to a fantastical, unbelieveable and ridiculous example to point out the futility of speculation. Yet, I'm speculating? Come on, are you that desperate?
whycliff wrote: » I forgot sarcasm is much harder to portray on AH than any other forum... Everyone on here is specualting my friend, unless they only wrote Stephen RIP.
drkpower wrote: » No; they are not. Speculation is to take the information available and come to conclusions as to what happened. Few are doing that. Personally, I dont have a problem with reasonable speculation based on the evidence we have. But the problem is that we have little or no information. All we know is that he died in his apartment. And therefore all speculation is essentially baseless. And if we are to just baselessly speculate, then he could have died from anything. He could have been abducted by aliens or he could be the second coming of Christ.Am I speculating again......? Yawn
drkpower wrote: » Your position gets flimsier and flimsier. Speculation is a consideration of reasonable alternatives. I was clearly and transparently pointing to a fantastical, unbelieveable and ridiculous example to point out the futility of speculation. Yet, I'm speculating? Come on, are you that desperate? Giving two general examples of potential causes of sudden non-accidental death is speculation in this particular case? Dont be silly; you can google these things if you were bothered. Clearly, you werent.
Mental Mickey wrote: » Good post.
whycliff wrote: » I really dont know where you have plucked your "non-accidental" stuff out of, if it was non accidental would it not be malicious?
drkpower wrote: » It's in public. Please tell me you know the difference between the appropriateness of things done in public and private.
gdael wrote: » So are we not to discuss it in the pub either :rolleyes:
drkpower wrote: » Apologies, mis-speak - edited.Giving two general examples of potential causes of sudden accidental death while sleeping is speculation in this particular case?
drkpower wrote: » Do you broadcast your conversations in the entire pub?
whycliff wrote: » And to say the statement isnt carefully worded would be silly,(not by the family) its to prevent people like us specualting..:D
gdael wrote: » Unless you accidentally dont wake up.
drkpower wrote: » This is what Kean said:"There's no foul play involved, and it's not suicide. It's just a tragic accident is what we've been toldand we're happy that that is correct information," Kean said. "There is nothing untoward. It's not drugs, we don't believe. It's not suicide. It's not murder. It's not a fight. That's what we've been told." It is hardly carefully worded and clearly the information re an "accident" is third hand. As I say, speculation on such flimsy information is pointless.
Dudess wrote: » The jokes are lame but the insincere "sorrow" at the death of someone people didn't know/care about when alive is as bad.
Dudess wrote: » The jokes are lame but the insincere "sorrow" at the death of someone people didn't know/care about when alive is as bad. .
whycliff wrote: » It would be no worse then is what in The Irish Sun in the morning... I doubt any of his family will be buying it. Most of whats said in AH, is very clearly tongue in cheek...there are always the one or 2 idiots...
Daroxtar wrote: » There's 2 or 3 pricks who seem to think this thread is all about them. Its not. Shut up. Ye'r boring the fuk outta me.
unkel wrote: » Spanish police: he choked on his own vomit. Article.