pseudonym wrote: tommo wrote: I passed Morris's today and the workers are on strike, whoever is right or wrong I don't care because in strikes both sides put huge spin on their point of view. John Halligan was walking the picket with the workers and I thought to myself it's nice for a change to see the Mayor supporting the ordinary man standing up for himself. Take a bow John Why should the Mayor take any side in a strike?
tommo wrote: I passed Morris's today and the workers are on strike, whoever is right or wrong I don't care because in strikes both sides put huge spin on their point of view. John Halligan was walking the picket with the workers and I thought to myself it's nice for a change to see the Mayor supporting the ordinary man standing up for himself. Take a bow John
robtri wrote: » How the hell does striking make things better here!!!!
robtri wrote: » let me see if I have this right... Morris's profits are down, a lot.... So company and staff agree to short hours overtime at flat rate ect... Still company profits are down.... Company wants to stay in business and not have to shut up shop... so unfortunately the decission made to let a few people go to save jobs for the majority of staff and to save the business themselves. Staff not happy so they go on Strike!!!! which will have the effect of the company losing more money and potentially more people will have to loose their jobs??? How the hell does striking make things better here!!!!
SUNGOD wrote: » the company wants to pick who is made redundant eg worker (A) is there 10 years he is told he is been left go worker (B) is there 1 year and he is kept as far as i know they only want a last in first out policy which if its true seems fair to me
phil16phil wrote: » John Halligan was manager of St Josephs soccer club, when I played for them. He,s was brilliant at managing people, totally down to earth and always looked out for the ordinary person. Some things havn,t changed. That said, striking in the current climate, especially for a builders providers is lunacy.
hardworking mom wrote: » I'm not so sure it's as cut 'n dry as all that, I've shopped in Morris's with the past 4 years, & I find that there are a few exceptional staff members (mainly in the shop area) and alot of rude/ignorant/ungrateful staff (mainly in the yard/timber area). I can't blame the management for wanting to keep those staff that keep customers coming through the doors as opposed to those that may be knowledgeable, but are not suitable for dealing with the general public. Those that have been rude/unprofessional deserve nothing better than to be shown the door in my opinion. They will appreciate the next job they get, and those that are kept in employment will help the company to grow, therefore creating more jobs in the correct environment. Maybe it wasn't handled the best way, but in the long run, 67 jobs are better than none. And then we might be able to shop in the store without being grunted at, or looked down at when I don't know the difference between different types of skirting boards..... (rant over I promise)
longshanks wrote: » in all fairness this isn't about someones percieved notions of shop assistants being rude. its about management treating their staff in an ignorant manner, leaving people go who should have job security and retaining those who are cheaper to employ.
robtri wrote: » as ssaid before.... whats the point of firing your kitchen sales staff and replacing them with yard workers??? how the hell does that work....
Kahless wrote: » Other retailers move people between departments all the time as needed. Why should this be different? I know someone who used to work at Morris's and he used to move between different departments even without job losses being the cause.