CDfm wrote: » As an alternative to getting burnt to death or suffocating its probably what I would have done. I am a bit of a chicken.
CDfm wrote: » As an alternative to getting burnt to death or suffocating its probably what I would have done. I am a bit of a chicken with extreme pain.
brummytom wrote: » Yeah I always thought it was so they wouldn't have to suffer being burned. Though getting crushed was probably quicker (I realise this sounds insensitive, it's not meant to, it's just an observation) If it was me, I don't know what I'd do. I don't think I'd have the guts to jump. But being burned... horrible
chatterpillar wrote: » It's hard for any of us to say for certain what we'd have done!
Biggins wrote: » Falling from such a height by the way, there is a chance you will be dead before you even hit the ground. Its something to do with the speed your falling at, unable to catch your breath or the surrounding air, etc. Most of us have at some stage stuck our heads out a moving car window. remember how hard it is to breath when doing that at high speed? I hope I never have to make that ultimate decision for myself. Humans by their nature are also fighters. Even in that they fight for there might be a glimmer of hope of rescue or change in survival chances. When that hope is gone, all that is left is the decision about how you wish to go! ...and sadly, on that day, that is what many faced. May they rest in peace.
Hazys wrote: » I doubt you'd die from not being able to breath bcos when i did a skydive we were free falling for 60 secs, 14000 feet in the air where there is less dense air. I presume you can free fall for much longer without any problems. Id be suprised if the fall from the top of the WTC to the bottom is longer than 60 secs. But still not a situation id like to be in.