cGirl wrote: » Silly me, thinking maybe they could be described as "people". Maybe I just picked up the insinuation that the problem here was Oh, gosh, the travellers are at it again...I don't feel he specifically needed to point out that people of a certain cultural background came into his shop to steal. He would have gotten comments just as constructive had he said "people". They are people, right? I'm not trying to cause an argument, this is just something I take issue with.
Posy wrote: » Didn't somebody already suggest giving some of them jobs?
Dublindude69 wrote: » That's not up to me and the higher ups won't do it.
MrStuffins wrote: » Funnily enough, when i was a kid i worked in a pub. There was this one guy who always caused murder, thought he was Steven Seagal! He used to batter all the bouncers until no bouncer would work there anymore. So they hired him as bouncer and the trouble stopped :pac:
waitinforatrain wrote: » Shup with your PC ****e, of course it's relevant that they're travellers. You wouldn't get a settled family doing that again and again and getting away with it. And there's a limit to how far you can push a traveller without making yourself an enemy of the whole family.
Posy wrote: » Ha! That's smart thinking. :pac:
cGirl wrote: » Why the need to specifically point out that they're travellers?
cGirl wrote: » Silly me, thinking maybe they could be described as "people". Maybe I just picked up the insinuation that the problem here was Oh, gosh, the travellers are at it again....
Rabies wrote: » The Walsho, Your racial joke comment is removed.
Traveller jokes are about as racist as Kerry/ Cavan/ Northsider/ D4 jokes.
Rabies wrote: » Because they are If it was a group of scumbag little kids of the depths of Tallaght, they'd be called that. Calling someone a traveller that is a traveller, isn't a problem. Degrading travellers is a problem. Stealing is stealing. The posters has identified who it was
Nevore wrote: » When you see them coming in the door, tell them loudly that they're barred and you're calling the guards over their trespassing on private property.
cGirl wrote: » No, I'm genuinely curious as to the relevance that has to his post.