weshtawake wrote: » Could someone summarise for me what the BER requirements are for a new house build
weshtawake wrote: » Couple of questions on this: 1) If it is a legal requirement how/who monitors it to ensure it has been carried out? 2) When is it carried out - at the house planning stage before the build has started? 3) How much should it cost? m
Bhoypaul wrote: » Your are legally obliged to have one carried out. You have to appoint an assessor who is independent from you, your architect and your builder.
Bhoypaul wrote: » Syd doesn't section d) exclude the architect carrying out an assessment on his own design as he/she would have a financial interest in a "good" rating?
weshtawake wrote: » OK so the BER is controlled by the Local Authority. So before I move into my new house I have to provide the L.A. with a BER rating. Is there a minimum BER rating acceptable to the L.A. and what powers do they have if that minimum is not reached given that the house has been built and is ready to be occupied?
Bhoypaul wrote: » doesn't section d) exclude the architect carrying out an assessment on his own design as he/she would have a financial interest in a "good" rating?
sydthebeat wrote: » how could he?? why would an architects fees be index linked what rating the dwelling ends up as?? architects fees are usually either fixed agreed, or as a percentage of construction costs.....
No6 wrote: » So are you afraid that your house dosn't comply? or do you know it dosn't? You actually don't have to provide the LA with a BER unless they ask for one (which they can) It actually goes with the deeds of your house in the solicitors office with the certificates of compliance.
d'Oracle wrote: » Building built to the current building regulations (TGD L 2008) should reach around C1 - B3. Some LA's are adopting that approach Bhoypaul. I know DCC are looking at A3.
No6 wrote: » Make that a A3 to B1 for 2008 regs, C1-B3 was the 2005 regs.
tmdsurvey wrote: » I have been heard on the grapevine that the RIAI have looked into this in detail and further clarified that an Architect acting on behalf of a Client does not fall within the code exclusions.