Edgedinblue wrote: » doesnt matter its not mine its my house-mates boyfriends tv, i refuse to pay for something that isnt mine or that i hardly ever use! if it was my tv then grand no bother, but its not so no way. the inspector can easily have his name and send the summons to him. i never wanted the stupid 70s tv in the house anyway
jaydoubleyoubee wrote: » Strange that the TV licence inspectors I met didn't know this. Also does this mean if you rip the piece of circuitry from your television set that allows it to receive a tv signal, i.e. modify it to make it a pc monitor, then you have to pay a tv licence? It's technically a custom made product that does not receive signals. Did you know, this means if someone dumps a broken television on your property you're required to pay for a TV licence for it, that's hilarious. I'm thinking of posting small broken TVs to people I don't like and then reporting them to the TV licence inspectors. lol
son.of.jimi wrote: » I'm on my way to the dump to pick up a load of broken tv's now. . . . ROFL Such a stupid license. . .
Sparky wrote: » Put on snickers workwear Find a hammer, snips - any tool Hide the wife Open door "ahh ok - well I'm only working here but I'll let the owners know when they come back in a few weeks" Also works on chuggers
jaydoubleyoubee wrote: » Every time someone rings the doorbell remove the fuse from the plug on the tv and turn the tv to face the wall...... Allow him to test the tv in several sockets in the house just to be sure.
ScumLord wrote: » I find nudity much more effective. Props can be used for added effect.
ShooterSF wrote: » Sexy props?
veryangryman wrote: » http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showt...p?t=2055620766 Your thread has just been added to that thread OP. Hope your proud
Rented accommodation If you are a tenant living in rented accommodation with a television you must have a television licence. This applies irrespective of who owns the television (whether the television belongs to you or the landlord). The law states that anyone resident on a premises in possession of a television set must have a television licence. from: http://www.citizensinformation.ie/categories/consumer-affairs/media/tv_licences
Bob Z wrote: » i think if there is someone staying in the house overnight and they answer the door they could be liable
Dinter wrote: » Note the bit about PC's!! :mad:http://www.citizensinformation.ie/categories/consumer-affairs/media/tv_licences
Edgedinblue wrote: » question, if in student accomodation/ or rented accomodation and theres a tv there is the tenant or the landlord responsible for the tv license? or is it up to the person who actually owns the tv>
mickoneill30 wrote: » Regarding removing a tuner from a TV. I emailed Dublin.TVlicence@anpost.ie just to see what they thought the situation was. The reply I got contained.In legal terms a television set, as per the Broadcasting and Wireless Telegraphy Act 1988, means "any apparatus for wireless telegraphy capable of receiving and exhibiting television programmes broadcast for general reception whether or not its use for that purpose is dependent on the use of anything else in conjunction therewith and any assembly comprising such apparatus and other apparatus. Based on this broad definition, An Post's contention is that even if a television set is modified and not used to receive television signals it is still an apparatus for wireless telegraphy and as such requires a licence.
Harry Huffnagle wrote: » Hi, Was wondering if anyone could help me - I live in an apartment. I don't have a tv licence. I had a friend staying with me for a few months, and one evening while I was out, a tv licence inspector buzzed the intercom. My friend answered said he didn't know if there was a licence on the premises and gave the inspector his name. Heard nothing for a couple of weeks, then got a standard letter addressed to my friend saying he should get a licence. He had actually moved out at this stage, and I just ignored the letter. A few weeks later another standard letter came addressed to him again, this time mentioning that he could be taken to court etc etc. I ignored this one too. Came home yesterday and found a registered post attempted delivery form in the mailbox, addressed to him. There's apparently a registered letter waiting for him to collect at the post office. I am 100% sure this is from the tv licence people. I don't want to collect it, cause I will have to sign for it myself and provide ID etc. But I'm worried it may be a summons or something like that, and I don't want my mate having to go to court. So I don't know whether to ignore it or collect it or maybe just a licence in my name right away. Has anyone got a registered letter from these guys before?
Dublin_Gunner wrote: » Well he doesn't live there, you are the occupant, and as such YOU should have the license. He will not be prosecuted, as he doesn't live there, does not reside there, and therefore does not require a license. You however, will be, when they come looking for YOU and YOUR license.
Harry Huffnagle wrote: » Oh I realise there's no way out of getting a licence at this stage, but I'm just not certain what to do about this letter. If the registered letter just gets sent back to the tv licence people and I get a licence sortish sharpish would that be enough for them to leave it be? I basically just need to find out if that letter is a summons or not, cause if it is, that makes thing a bit more complicated, so I was wondering if anyone had got a registered letter from these guys before.