prinz wrote: » People who are confused about their sexuality =/= a healthy relationship.
Moomoo1 wrote: » Being confused about your sexuality does not mean you cannot genuinly love someone.
Moomoo1 wrote: » give him a break mate - he is clearly confused about his sexuality and needs support and sympathy, not to be dumped out of the family nest at the first sign of trouble
prinz wrote: » Don't you think that confusion should be settled before you commit your life to one person? Before you bring a baby into the world with that person? You're assuming that he will stop. I think if he's that confused it's pretty safe to say he won't stop. Why would he? If he decides he's gay, what then... if he decides he's bi, do you think he'll just stop all this nonsense he's being going on with? Even if he decides he's bi do you think it's going to be easy for the OP to live with that?
Moomoo1 wrote: » give him a break mate - he is clearly confused about his sexuality and needs support and sympathy, not to be dumped out of the family nest at the first sign of trouble.
Moomoo1 wrote: » I agree that he has been inconsiderate and silly,
Moomoo1 wrote: » but I really don't think that anything he did warrants the OP putting him and herself through a painful breakup of an otherwise healthy relationship.
Moomoo1 wrote: » Sawing branches you are sitting on isn't very clever or mature.
Oh The Humanity wrote: » Unbelievable! HE needs support and sympathy? Are you for real. This woman has just given birth and is now trying to care for a newborn for the first time!!! Its her who needs support and sympathy not another human burden with the worst sense of timing ever. Jaysus wept.
Oh The Humanity wrote: » HE IS SUPPOSED TO BE SUPPORTING HER AND HIS DAUGHTER. Not tearing OP apart emotionally. Have you any comprehension of the phsysical and emotional toll of pregnancy, birth and newborn care? People have nervous breakdowns from those things alone, never mind this self centred parasite looking to be mothered when he should be the adult and backbone of the 'family nest' at this time.
Oh The Humanity wrote: » That has got to be the most ridiculous understatement I have heard on boards in a long time. He has been mendacious, using, self serving, sly, selfish and cruel.
Oh The Humanity wrote: » I 100% disagree. He has burned his bridges irreversably.
Oh The Humanity wrote: » She is not sitting on the branch. The branch has become a cross accross her back. A burden for her to carry that is almost breaking her at this critical time in her life. So lets take that and apply it to him. HE is not very smart or clever to be sawing the branch HE is sitting on.....but he has.....and I am glad at least OP has found out what he is up to.
Moomoo1 wrote: » The fact he made no attempts to hide his indisgressions suggests he didn't think much of them, didn't think that they would be taken so badly.
Moomoo1 wrote: » Nah. Give it time, and things will be great again. Well, I just think that what you are advising her to do (end the relationship) is must more damaging and counter-productive than what he did (chat up a few men online).
Moomoo1 wrote: » she needs support and sympathy too, I am not disputing that. But so does he.
Moomoo1 wrote: » From what I've heard, he has supported the OP and her daughter faithfully for 5 years and has been a very good bf.
Moomoo1 wrote: » It's strange that people are so quick to just ignore that. Yes, there is his indisgression on one hand, but you have to weigh that against the multitude of positive things he presumably did for the relationship.
Moomoo1 wrote: » You don't have enough to go on to make those sorts of assumptions. He may not have realised that what he was doing was wrong. Everyone has a character weakness you know, no one's nearly as much of a saint as they pretend to be...
Moomoo1 wrote: » Nah. Give it time, and things will be great again.
Moomoo1 wrote: » Well, I just think that what you are advising her to do (end the relationship) is must more damaging and counter-productive than what he did (chat up a few men online).
Oh The Humanity wrote: » It is not the victims job to support the con artist.
Oh The Humanity wrote: » No you dont. Certainly not. Some things are dealbreakers. Concealing a material fact cuch as 'Im gay/bisexual' is one of those things.
Oh The Humanity wrote: » I certainly DO have enough to go on. All you need to know is he is gay/bisexual and he has concealed this from OP. On getting caught he has attempted to muddy the waters in a further show of dispicable greed.
Oh The Humanity wrote: » This is not 'character weakness' -this is deliberately taking away his partners free will to choose whether she wants to be with him or not. With him for WHO HE REALLY IS.
Oh The Humanity wrote: » He didn't think about anything except HIMSELF you mean. So someone who doesn't know right from wrong and does nothing but think of themselves when there is a new baby in the house.......nothing but a useless drain, must be got rid of.
Moomoo1 wrote: » I think he's as much a victim in this as her. If we had a more open-minded society, then maybe he wouldn't have needed to live a lie for 5 years...
Moomoo1 wrote: » I think he's as much a victim in this as her. If we had a more open-minded society, then maybe he wouldn't have needed to live a lie for 5 years..... I am sure he loves her and wants to preserve their relationship. If he didn't, he'd have gone long ago..
Moomoo1 wrote: » The partner still had the free will and chose him. When you love someone, you love _all_ of them - including their inadequacies. You cannot say 'oh well, if he's bisexual I don't want him'.
Moomoo1 wrote: » you cannot seriously say that. You HAVE to weigh the good things against the bad things.
Moomoo1 wrote: » I can fully understand why he did that. There is still a massive stigma attached to homosexuality of any sort. If you love someone and want to be with them, isn't it a bit too much to ask to reveal things about yourself that would definately drive them away?
Moomoo1 wrote: » The partner still had the free will and chose him.
Moomoo1 wrote: » When you love someone, you love _all_ of them - including their inadequacies.
Moomoo1 wrote: » You cannot say 'oh well, if he's bisexual I don't want him'. The 'cheating' is more of a problem, but once again, if he stops it I am sure it can all be happily resolved. People do make mistakes you know...
Moomoo1 wrote: » the same useless drain that the OP describes as a 'good boyfriend' of 5 years? Not so useless then, right? And he isn't just thinking about himself: I am sure he loves her and wants to preserve their relationship. If he didn't, he'd have gone long ago.
nmesisca wrote: » .. nobody seems to acknowlege the fact that before 'pretending' with his wife, this guy is probably in denial with his own person. just a thought, but hard as you might try, you dont fool nature for very long, and i bet this guy is not going through a very happy time in his life. this is much more profound than that, and goes beyond their relationship. just my 2cents.
Saucey-Susie wrote: » "If you love someone and want to be with them, isn't it a bit too much to ask to reveal things about yourself that would definately drive them away?" I think the sexuality of your other half is definitely something that you should know, straight up (no pun intended)
unreg wrote: » And to those sympathisers - don't tell me you would be able to accept this if it was your other half who behaved in this way - can you honestly say you would rationalise this and say that his lies and deceit could be excused?
Oh The Humanity wrote: » Im not sure what you are getting at......? Do you mean that his pain transcends hers and justifies the sham ? Apologies if not, Im just not sure of your point.
Unregistered wrote: » Have already posted saying I've been through a similar situation. To be honest, I'm amazed that a few of you seem to think the feelings and difficulties of the OPs boyfriend are just as, if not more important than what she is going through. It is not the OPs problem that her boyfriend cannot/will not admit his sexuality. The fact is, irrespective of whatever struggles he is going through, he has deliberately used her to cover his "secret". He is engaging in behaviour that is not acceptable within the boundaries of a relationship. And to those sympathisers - don't tell me you would be able to accept this if it was your other half who behaved in this way - can you honestly say you would rationalise this and say that his lies and deceit could be excused? I think not. If you found pictures - of either sex, on your other half's phone etc etc? It is betrayal, lying and manipulation of the highest order and no amount of attempted justification on societal grounds will change that. Bottom line is, he CHOSE to engage in this behaviour and deceive his partner, she had no such luxury of choice.