emma82 wrote: » just got engaged- planning for 2011- hotels don't even have 2011 prices yet- should we get signed into something at 2009 prices or wait?
done a very early head count and are looking at 250 already- thats without family input!!! very scared at the thought of prices etc- can i ask a stupid question- how do people afford these huge days?:eek::eek:
seamus wrote: » Wait. Go look at places, but absolutely don't agree to 2009 prices - many places have in past insisted on their "right" to review the cost of the menu from year-to-year, so this shouldn't be a problem. OK. For a very modest meal, you're looking at €50/head. So that's €12,500 on the meal alone. We're getting a particularly expensive meal and we're still spending less than that. It's time to start culling your numbers. Your only criteria for each guest should be, "Will I look back in 10 years time and be glad that they were there?". You don't invite colleagues unless they are very very good friends. Avoid inviting long-lost cousins or people you see once every five years. "We're keeping down costs" is a perfectly valid excuse for only inviting your parents' siblings and not your cousins. Old college & school friends that you used to go drinking with but haven't seen them since they moved to the USA ten years ago? Forget them. Your next-door neighbour from when you were a kid? Forget them. Not inviting children will also keep your numbers down. Even if your best mate has five kids that you all adore, tell them to take the night off and come party with you.
Trigger Happy wrote: » A good rule of thumb is that if you do not have their number in your mobile phone - do not invite!
seamus wrote: » OK. For a very modest meal, you're looking at €50/head. So that's €12,500 on the meal alone. We're getting a particularly expensive meal and we're still spending less than that.
prinz wrote: » The first thing I don't understand is the whole photographer / videographer thing. Sure every person there is bound to have a digital camera or video anyway. What you do is ask your guests to send you their pics of the day, choose the best and make your own album for <10% of the cost of a photographer. tbh there's not a whole lot of difference in the standard anyway for most.
seamus wrote: » There is an enormous difference between a professional photographer with professional equipment and a 30 year old with a pocket camera after 6 pints of Guinness. To pretend otherwise is fooling yourself. Same goes for a professional videographer versus your Uncle and his Sony handycam.
shane b wrote: » Photographers. € 1850 Videographer: €800
deemark wrote: » Photographer: 1700
prinz wrote: » Is the difference worth the best part of €2000 when people are concerned about budgeting? I think not. Add to that not everyone drinks and plenty of people are quite good with their "pocket cameras".
seamus wrote: » http://www.markgriffinphoto.com/weddings.htm Look at them and tell me that anyone with a pocket camera would produce something remotely as good as those. I've seen people's facebook albums. Hundreds of "nice" photos, but they don't compare with a professionally-produced album.
seamus wrote: » I suggest then you advertise your services because if you think you can do as good as that, there's big money in it for you. Or you're simply underestimating the skill that goes into such a portfolio.
prinz wrote: » Isn't that exactly the point I was making?
dlambirl wrote: » God reading this is giving me the shivers..... We're not even engaged but we did a rough head count on IF we did get married who we'd have to ask.... Counted 300+ :rolleyes:
Unwilling wrote: » Hi I would really like to learn more about where you got married (venue) that is my current stumbling block. I know I can do well with my money for dress, cake, flowers, not interested in cars, have a good price for photographer... but it's all hinging on the bloody venue. Most of which charge MORE if I have less than 100 people. Which I do. Would love your help Thanks