nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

DEbris not from missing Air France jet

TheZohanS · 2009-06-05T17:23:13+00:00

Source RTE It was just sea trash.

TheZohanS

Source RTE

The mystery surrounding the crash of an Air France plane off the coast of Brazil has deepened after Brazilian officials revealed that debris pulled from the sea was not from the missing jet.

The search by ships for wreckage from Air France flight AF 477, which came down early Monday as it was flying from Rio to Janeiro to Paris with 228 people on board, is continuing.

'Up to now, no material from the plane has been recovered,' Brigadier Ramon Cardoso, director of Brazilian air traffic control, told reporters in the northeastern city of Recife late last night.

That contradicted a statement Brigadier Cardoso made earlier when he said a palette and two buoys plucked from the Atlantic by navy crews were the first pieces of the Air France crash.

In fact, Mr Cardoso admitted later, they were nothing more than sea 'trash' - probably from a ship, as was a big oil patch originally described as a fuel slick from the French jet.

It was just sea trash.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Hank Scorpio

thats mental

My name is URL

Weird as hell really

phasers

That is awful... People dumping in the ocean needs to stop

dlofnep

Wow, so it has totally dissapeared?

CianRyan

Did it fly over Bermuda?

Wertz

CianRyan wrote: »

Did it fly over Bermuda?

That's the first thing my mate said the other night...but triangle is a thousnad plus miles further NW from the flightpath.

Ponster

http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055580023

The Al Lad

They will be the new episode of Lost...

dlofnep

CianRyan wrote: »

Did it fly over Bermuda?

i was thinking the same thing when i first read about it, but i looked at the map between the two points and its no where near it..

Overheal

it was aliens, clearly.

CianRyan

Wertz wrote: »

That's the first thing my mate said the other night...but triangle is a thousnad plus miles further NW from the flightpath.

Haha, damn. That's my theory fúcked.:p

The Al Lad wrote: »

They will be the new episode of Lost...

Thought that myself, hadn't said it to anyone. Thought it was a bit too soon like. :pac:

Latchy

Perhaps the bermuda triangle has spread bit ? .That is so weird

Ciaran500

CianRyan wrote: »

Did it fly over Bermuda?

Wertz wrote: »

That's the first thing my mate said the other night...but triangle is a thousnad plus miles further NW from the flightpath.

dlofnep wrote: »

i was thinking the same thing when i first read about it, but i looked at the map between the two points and its no where near it..

CianRyan wrote: »

Haha, damn. That's my theory fúcked.:p

Latchy wrote: »

Perhaps the bermuda triangle has spread bit ? .That is so weird

WTF is this shoite.

If it was over the bermuda triangle you'd all be throwing around crack pot theories but since its not theres nothing weird going on here.

CianRyan

Ciaran500 wrote: »

WTF is this shoite.

If it was over the bermuda triangle you'd all be throwing around crack pot theories but since its not theres nothing weird going on here.

http://www.bolman.nl/cgtalk/supervlieg_cow057_big.jpg
IT WAS THIS THING!! IT SWAM AND GOT TO THE PLANE!

/caps

Sleipnir

Latchy wrote: »

Perhaps the bermuda triangle has spread bit ? .That is so weird

Yah, it's spread over the entire Atlantic Ocean so now anything that disappears anywhere in it can be explained by it being in the Bermuda Triangle.

seanybiker

jaysus thats well strange alright.

delllat

theres a good chance the army was testing a secret new weapon and decided to live test it on that plane

[Deleted User]

delllat wrote: »

theres a good chance the army was testing a secret new weapon and decided to live test it on that plane

Yep. Well done. Case closed.

Sleipnir

delllat wrote: »

theres a good chance the army was testing a secret new weapon and decided to live test it on that plane

"A good chance" How d'ya reckon it's a "good chance"?

Latchy

Ciaran500 wrote: »

WTF is this shoite.

If it was over the bermuda triangle you'd all be throwing around crack pot theories but since its not theres nothing weird going on here.

Bermuda trinagle quote was just a throwaway comment .

I would imagine you are non the wiser than the rest of us .

Lighten up

Sleipnir wrote: »

Yah, it's spread over the entire Atlantic Ocean so now anything that disappears anywhere in it can be explained by it being in the Bermuda Triangle.

( as above) It could have dissapeared into a black hole in space for all you and I know

Wertz

Ciaran500 wrote: »

WTF is this shoite.

If it was over the bermuda triangle you'd all be throwing around crack pot theories but since its not theres nothing weird going on here.

Hold on a minute, no-one's saying that there isn't anything weird going on, just that for the moment, the usual place famous for disappeared things is not a suspect. Everything else is on the table...personally I think it's been shot down for some reason that will never emerge (wouldn't nbe the first time a commercial airliner was downed by military)...although that said, a plane falling 5 miles out of the sky into 2 mile deep water isn't going to be easy to find, but you'd expect in these modern times that something would be tracable...

TheZohanS

delllat wrote: »

theres a good chance the army was testing a secret new weapon and decided to live test it on that plane

Ah come on now delllat...seriously.

Latchy

Wertz wrote: »

Hold on a minute, no-one's saying that there isn't anything weird going on, just that for the moment, the usual place famous for disappeared things is not a suspect. Everything else is on the table...personally I think it's been shot down for some reason that will never emerge (wouldn't nbe the first time a commercial airliner was downed by military)...although that said, a plane falling 5 miles out of the sky into 2 mile deep water isn't going to be easy to find, but you'd expect in these modern times that something would be tracable...

Exactly ,with no tangible evidence to go on , people (joking or not ) will pull out anything out to explain ie, bermuda triangle because their is nothing or little else to go on

CianRyan

Do you really trust America?

They could blow up Mexico and cover it up ffs.
I think that option is definitely on the table.

Sleipnir

Wertz wrote: »

personally I think it's been shot down for some reason that will never emerge

but what are you basing that on?
Korean Airlines KAL 007 was shot down by the Russians (probably) and there's evidence to suggest that happened.

Iran Air Flight 655 was shot down by the USS Vincennes and there's evidence to show this.

There's zero evidence to show that this Air France flight was shot down. None whatsoever, so you're just guessing.

Wertz

Of course I am....so are the brazilian airforce and Air France and just about anyone else at the moment.

In the lack of anything concrete and believable, I've gone for an outlandish and not unprecedented posibility...it's much more fun than the boring lightning/engine failure/gravity explanation.

CianRyan

Sleipnir wrote: »

but what are you basing that on?
Korean Airlines KAL 007 was shot down by the Russians (probably) and there's evidence to suggest that happened.

Iran Air Flight 655 was shot down by the USS Vincennes and there's evidence to show this.

There's zero evidence to show that this Air France flight was shot down. None whatsoever, so you're just guessing.

Is there evidence against his statement, other than we know nothing?
You can not dismiss anything at this point in time.

Sleipnir

Wertz wrote: »

Of course I am....so are the brazilian airforce and Air France and just about anyone else at the moment.

In the lack of anything concrete and believable, I've gone for an outlandish and not unprecedented posibility...it's much more fun than the boring lightning/engine failure/gravity explanation.

Oh, alright then!:D

Sleipnir

CianRyan wrote: »

Is there evidence against his statement, other than we know nothing?
You can not dismiss anything at this point in time.

Okay, so because we have no evidence, everybodies right. :rolleyes:

Gran Hermano

So it wasn't de brie