Mr.S wrote: » Well if we're being picky, No one says a women has to come up;)
drunken_munky52 wrote: » I think this incident is good for all ye leaving certers. It shows you that life is unpredictable and the need for you to learn to adapt, there are plenty more challanges ahead, this is a wake up call. Take it with a pinch of salt
Frolick wrote: » He looked at the exam sticker saying ENGLISH PAPER II right? The two random students saw it and signed that it is the right paper... I think there might be more to this... Taking to my supervisor today she said that is doesn't know how this could happen... Its a state exam for christ sake, people should be ALERT!
rivalius13 wrote: » Womens rights activists will be up in arms. The suffragette movement was actually about getting a female poet on the LC, the right to vote was just a byproduct of it all. Their pamphlets were very confusing and politicians were pretty confused as to that they wanted.
xOxSinéadxOx wrote: » I wouldn't really blame the students who signed it. I know I wouldn't have been looking to see what it said. students just sign it to say it wasn't open anyway AFAIK
Mr.S wrote: » They go to the guys house, they leave their phones at home, they stay the night and go to the exam on Sunday. How are they supposed to get information? Even if they do, who the fuck cares? Please, tell me, how does it affect you? Do you care that so many people are going to be cheating in Maths, Bio, geo etc?
drunken_munky52 wrote: » Thats right, been pissed off is really going to help you now. In 20 years time youll be a bitter old man saying that bas**** examiner, he ruined my life, oh no!!!! Im a failure!!
Mr.S wrote: » Um, no i wouldn't report them, i'd concentrate on my ****ing exam rather then worry about people cheating and getting a better grade then me. This is ~10 people we're talking about, not 55,000. If they cheat and get an A, your exam/grade will not be affected.
fifa09 wrote: » i dont care who cheats in exams i didnt care that people in louth had an advantage all i cared about was doing my exam !!! and now im completly thrown off ! all my routine is screwed up ! i cant even concentrate on maths and i reeealy have to ! and now 3 and a half hours of saturday is going to be spent doing a paper that we should already have done !!! i have sooo much study to do for next week when am i going to get this done?????
phasers wrote: » Hmm... how long does it take to convert to Judaism?
Fad wrote: » Judaism is not an actively Evangelical religion, it'd take quite a while.
.DarDarBinks wrote: » The SEC dont give a sh1te about how you cope with the other subjects, English imo, is the pride of place for them, thats why its first, thats why there is so much emphasis on it, honestly they dont give a fxck about how you do in maths or geog tmo because of this.
phasers wrote: » It was kind of a joke question
Claypigeon wrote: » Do you care that so many people are going to be cheating in Maths, Bio, geo etc? How is that 10 people? Them getting a higher grade than you means that everyone in the country gets marked lower on the question they cheat on. You're a selfish ignorant human being with no conscience if you don't report someone cheating on something so vital to so many people. Maybe it's time you took the other 50,000 people into consideration then. People who tolerate abuse of the system are just dragging everyone down. Get a clue, people.
Fad wrote: » I know . But if that answer isnt given now, the joke about converting would go on for too long.............
Mr.S wrote: » I was talking about the English exam with the ~10 people thing. Your exam is not going to be severly affected by people who cheat, if everyone got an A, then yeah obviously, but people who cheat don't get A's.
poisonated wrote: » you may need to do your bar mitzvah and...nah I wont go there:p
Mr.S wrote: » Jesus. I never said cheating was ok, not everyone cheats. But people DO cheat, and its hardly an issue to other people, it shouldn't affect you. They are not "stealing" your grade. If they are cheating, its because they're poor at a subject.
Geog wrote: » If somebody was trying to think of a thread that would attract the public's attention, then this is it.
passive wrote: » Odd? anti-semite...
Fad wrote: » Billy, you shouldn't alert people to your own ignorance