spoonbadger wrote: » Oi'll <SNIP> on yore face!!.
Claypigeon wrote: » Good point. Btw, amuse yourself with this heroic chap who posted in a thread on (you guessed it!) Awl Onners dot eye e!honestly guys this did not Submitted by rob k on Wed, 03/06/2009 - 16:37. honestly guys this did not happen,its a rumour started by guys in drog and i know exactly who they are they wanted to spread it around and it got out of hand its not true ,
likely_lass wrote: » go study <SNIP>
Claypigeon wrote: » Today actually, your point being? Are you implying that because I registered today I can't point out that that sort of post is the standard that gets spammed on that site, not this one? Ah clearly. Shun! Shun!
Fad wrote: » Well Kevogy has been here for longer............... That said Allhonours is possibly the worst website ever.......
spoonbadger wrote: » Harsh words are true, but harsh.
ChickenScratch wrote: » I REMEMBERED MY THIRD THING I may be openinig a can of worms here but who thinks it was done on purpose? Also no sign of LC mentioned on Joe's podcasts, my heart bleeds
akaredtop wrote: » It just goes to prove that our great "Public Servants" are incompetent.
Killaqueen!!! wrote: » Hehe...this thread has 178 pages of ranting. You'd swear we weren't being allowed to sit our Leaving Cert or something. Can we have a change of blame please? We went from Louth ---> Examiners > Louth > Jews I say FF. The examiner was probably in FF
Killaqueen!!! wrote: » ...we weren't being allowed to sit our Leaving Cert or something...
ChickenScratch wrote: » No one remembers super-nintendo Chalmers? I like this new idea. Blame Fianna Fail. This is coming outta the taxpayers pocket you know. Sending all those new papers, postage and packaging, it's a travesty.
spoonbadger wrote: » We're not allowed sit our Leaving Cert?!! :eek: Rabblerabblrabble!!!
RetroRainbow wrote: » Makes me wonder if anyone on allhonours uses Firefox.
awhir wrote: » and paying all the supervisors time and a half ! maby it was a conspiracy between the supervisors , needed more money :P
Ricky91t wrote: » Did anyone here anything about the SEC giving study guidelines?Or is this bull?
Mallox wrote: » well i know everyone predicted banquo and deception but we were also told kingship might come up .. anyone reckon it will come up in the contingincy paper ps is it possible for baquo or deception to come up again jus as a different question??
Dumbledore wrote: » I heard something along those lines. Nothing official yet though, I presume it would have been given to the media by now so its not looking good unfortunately.