likely_lass wrote: » time for me to cheer you all up
LFC-Eanna wrote: » Clarke?
Stinjy wrote: » Yeah according to RTE news at 9 o'clock the examiner didn't seem to say anthing, it was through Twitter that the word was spread and the SEC found out.. What if twitter and other social networking sites wern't invented?? Would Louth have known the paper and the rest of Ireland not?? So much for the honesty of the examiner.. (remember this is only what the news seems to say)
eVeNtInE wrote: » This post has been deleted.
SantryRed wrote: » Seriously, people who are doing your Leaving. Why would you still be up now just to moan and panic and worry about what's happened? GO TO BED, get up early, and study that extra poet. Oh, and I'm not buying the whole it's messing my study up. How is that possible? Whatever you were going to do Saturday morning do tomorrow morning instead!
stevendcarroll wrote: » A petition to have the date of paper changed! SIGN IT
Ramey wrote: » Listen to thisssss, good night.
xOxSinéadxOx wrote: » yeah you're right, cavan would have been funnier. still louth though :pac:
The Walsho wrote: » I don't think they knew right away. Apparently they found out through twitter updates! There would be a serious amount of printing, binding and delivery involved.
niallsparky wrote: » Just do the 4. Sure it'll only take an extra hour or so?
Monzo wrote: » Cheers for that. A helpful post amidst a plethora of face-biting crap.
Mockatron wrote: » actually Sinead if you go on the Dublin Tutorial Centre's website you'll see that they're the only school in Ireland which offers A-Levels as an alternative to the LC WHIPPED!!!!!
GallowsGhost wrote: » That's a huge relief anyway. I love you for posting that
likely_lass wrote: » HEY THATS MY QUOTE i want my recognition:pac:
That_Guy wrote: » Good God. To quote a previous post.
xOxSinéadxOx wrote: » we do the leaving cert here. get over it.
foxerv1 wrote: » She said no, it will be more or less the same, but with slight differences. Obviously this is extremely vague, however i took it as this:The poets will most likely be the same The comparitive, i would probably look at GVV and Cultural Context Macbeth is where the differences may come, i would look at a character question for this
foxerv1 wrote: » Okay, as i have something of a vested interest in this years exams, given that i have spent the last 2 years tutoring LC students on the English, i happened to take a chance and i rang the junior press officer for the SEC. I told her who i was and that i was not looking for hints as to what was on the replacement paper, but just to know was it going to be the polar opposite of the leaked paper. She said no, it will be more or less the same, but with slight differences. Obviously this is extremely vague, however i took it as this:The poets will most likely be the same The comparitive, i would probably look at GVV and Cultural Context Macbeth is where the differences may come, i would look at a character question for this I wish i had more to impart, but all i can say is that in general, a contigencey plan is based on the original, and in the event of a back-up paper needing to be used, it will be sufficently different that in the event of the original being compromised, it wont guarantee an automatic A for the entire country(word of mouth etc). However, it will be sufficently similiar aswell, because as mentioned earlier, almost every teacher of higher level English bases their teaching methods on predicting what is likely to come up on the paper, and while the SEC is interested in testing the potential of the examinees, they do not want to screw them over entirely. Best of luck to all who are doing their exams, and try not to stress because of this, you now have an extra full day of study.....use it wisely.
xOxSinéadxOx wrote: » I don't get why they couldn't have had the 2nd paper printed and out to every centre by tomorrow morning. they knew as soon as paper 1 was over I presume. they would have been up all night probably but so what?
Ramey wrote: » Quoted, because many people seem to have missed such an informative post, thank you!