deemark wrote: » So, from the points I made, trying to inject a bit of reality, experience and reassurance into the debate, the only thing you took on board was that teachers get 3 months holidays?:rolleyes:
Waaahhh wrote: » He/She WON'T be allowed supervise an exam ever again, of that I am pretty much convinced!! And the thing about mistakes that makes them mistakes is that they are mostly stupid, basic, and avoidable!!
deemark wrote: » My colleagues have to come in on Saturday. Teachers are raging too!
Waaahhh wrote: » If it had been in Leitrim, it would've been 100 times funnier...:pac:..
Twinkle-star15 wrote: » The contingency paper was written ages ago though! They can't just change it now right? If both the mock papers had those exact poets and they didn't change them on the real paper, then I don't think that's going to make them change the new one. Only the questions we'll be asked on them are different Eg Instead of write a personal response to Keat's poetry We'll get Keats uses vivid imagery and emotive language. Discuss. ***This is only my opinion. I'm not 100% sure of this.****
deemark wrote: » There's no point in whinging - use the time tomorrow and get off the internet now!
likely_lass wrote: » this is where im hoping only studying the two women is gonna pay off
OneArt wrote: » For ****'s sake!! What about the bloody poets? Will they be changed around? I'm telling you if Adrienne Rich is on that paper I'm going to kill someone...
xOxSinéadxOx wrote: » anyone else find it really funny that it happened in louth?
BlueSpiral wrote: » The main thing I am worried about now is what to focus on for the new English paper. I have no idea how they make up back ups or if they even relate to the original paper. Do we still apply the predictions that our teachers have made, which all seem to be pretty similar, or is the back-up just a completely different ballpark? I don't know if I should be treating the first draft like a past paper, and disregarding the questions and topics thinking that they will not come up this round, or just take them as major hints.
rainbowtrout wrote: » No, only the ones supervising in the athlone area.... it wouldn't be realistic to ask someone to drive from donegal to athlone everyday of the exams.
Stinjy wrote: » The superintendants go to athlone pick the papers up and drive back or som I've heard... Theyre all kept there!
OneArt wrote: » For ****'s sake!! What about the bloody poets? Will they be changed around?
Leejo wrote: » :rolleyes: Are you him? How hard is it for the superintendent to read the cover properly "English paper 1" it should say not "English paper 2". It has disrupted a lot of study, not to mentioned caused a lot of unwarranted stress. Blame also has to be laid on the 2 students who made sure it was English paper 1, and signed for it. Why wasn't it reported at the time by the superintendent instead of the SEC finding out it had been leaked via the Internet (Source RTé). A lot of people are angry because it was a such a stupid and basic mistake, that could and SHOULD have been avoided. There's no two ways about it, he should not be allowed supervise a state exam again.
Sean_Ludawg wrote: » My heart bleeds for the teachers who's three months paid holidays are interrupted.