Antamojo wrote: » Yay, an intelligent person. I find that their confinement in a single county is in fact, beneficial to their welfare. If that examiner was to leave Co. Louth, I'm sure he/she would not survive in the wild in counties such as Dublin or Cork. Those damn leaving cert students are vicious predators, preying on weak, defenseless examiners.
BlueSpiral wrote: » With the large amount of new predators that have emerged from their bedroom nests, I'd say the rare primary consumer would have difficulty camouflaging himself in the current hot and bothered climate. He sure is a gem on their nibble niche. So what are we calling this event? Louthgate?
fuNk90 wrote: » ah **** it all. 4 hours of revision for nothin fml
A-C-C#-D wrote: » I hope to capture the decisive moment
Mr.S wrote: » Hopfully i'll wake up to "Leaving cert paper 2 cancelled, all students given A1" I have my douts though :pac:
sock puppet wrote: » Stupid louthmouths.
A-C-C#-D wrote: » I hope to capture the decisive moment, once the superintendant who was responsible discovers the bag of flaming dog **** on their door step. I wont take the picture while they are stamping out the flame but rather the moment just afterwards when they raise their head and the look of disgust on their face will make the picture!
almostnever wrote: » If I were to look at an examination paper,note its contents,turn around in my seat and inform an acquaintance of said contents,that would be cheating. I think,therefore,it is both reasonable and logical to call this behaviour cheating. It's on a much larger scale,also.
sock puppet wrote: » Lol. Why couldn't people have just shut up about it. Stupid louthmouths.
blubloblu wrote: » Anyone have any contacts at the International School in Tripoli, Libya? I bet they have a few copies of the paper.
ALincoln wrote: » Dont be ridiculous. Students sign the envelope in a cursory fashion - they're not deeply contemplating what's inside it - they're thinking about the paper that lies ahead. To accuse them of cheating is childish and desperate.
Antamojo wrote: » I say we give Louth to the North, along with the other s-hitty counties. *Waits for flaiming*
ALincoln wrote: » That's not what I was talking about - I was pointing out that the two students who signed the envelope in question should not be targeted by those who see fit to cast blame around rather than trying to adapt to the new schedule. But why let the facts get in the way of a good argument?
sock puppet wrote: » If by North you mean North Korea then yes. (only messing with you Louth people. I'd never wish that on anyone, even North Korea.)
cloak wrote: » If you think about it logicly,,, Whenever they are making out the two papers at the beginning of the year, they arent gonna make them impossibly different, because they understand the whole rigmarole of predictions, and that the majority of schools base their sylabus on predictions!!! ya dig???
randylonghorn wrote: » - Having it hanging over people for ages .... - People due to go away immediately after exams... Really? Since when? Not the way it used to be, certainly ...
Gavin shels wrote: » Bebolink
Zonda999 wrote: » Yep, as well as the fact that the most likely circumstance in which the contingency paper would have to be used is when the content of the original leaked out! There has to be some allowance for the fact that people have prepared for the original
degausserxo wrote: » I'd say by now the vast majority of LC students have found out what was on the paper. Should the SEC ban all of us from taking state exams?
