liah wrote: » School shouldn't be a place for religious indoctrination.
cls wrote: » How does a child come to their own conclusion that a certain type of religion is the truth? It's not possible without brainwashing them. My child isn't born yet, but I plan to try and teach it to come to its own conclusions based on facts and evidence. I will also try my best to teach it why religion is so widespread and why the majority of the country are delusional. It's not going to be easy thats for sure.
JimiTime wrote: » Personally, i think if you as a parent feel that atheism is important, you'd be neglectful, and pretty much an idiot not to teach your children as such. A parent has had so many years of life. When it comes to spiritual matters, if they have reached their conclusion that for example, christianity, is a steaming pile, then I think it would be irresponsible not to pass on this to your child. Similarly with a Christian. If I was to raise a child, you can guarantee I'm going to act responsibly, and teach him/her about Christ etc.
JimiTime wrote: » Hmmmm.
cls wrote: » You seem to be suggesting I'm contradicting myself. It's convenient how you selectively left out the part where I said I will try to teach them based on facts and evidence. From there they can come to their own conclusions. You wouldn't be religious by any chance? Its just the picking bits out that suit you and ignoring the rest is a familar trend...
robindch wrote: » When my own snowflake showed up 2.5 years ago, I thought it would be possible simply to ignore altogether the topics of gods and goddesses, devils, spirits, ghosts, bogeymen and the whole darn shooting match. Since then, though, I've noticed that there are a lot of adults out there who view it as their solemn duty either to assume the duty without mentioning it, or more often, simply to ignore entirely my wishes on the topic, and fill my child's mind with one kind of religious offal or another. Hell, one member of my extended family even boasted that this was what they'd do knowing full well that I didn't want it. In such a climate, one doesn't have any choice but to build up her defenses as best one can in the hope, if not the expectation, that she'll be able to deal with it when it does arrive. It would be great if religious people would respect my wishes as a parent, but it seems that a certain portion of them simply won't.
Flamed Diving wrote: » Yes. Better to teach an infant that dogmatic belief (whatever it is) is important. Better to manipulate their little minds while they are impressionable. How responsible. I think I will instill my child with Marxist ideology, just to see what happens. Arf, arf...
JimiTime wrote: » ...If you think that all religion is a lie, and that it is delusion etc etc etc. Then it is only right surely, to inform your child of this no? You disagree? If you think that for example, that Christ is the truth etc. Then it is only right surely, to teach your child as such no?....
JimiTime wrote: » If you think that all religion is a lie, and that it is delusion etc etc etc. Then it is only right surely, to inform your child of this no? You disagree? If you think that for example, that Christ is the truth etc. Then it is only right surely, to teach your child as such no?
JimiTime wrote: » BTW. What is the difference between teaching, and indoctrinating?
Flamed Diving wrote: » No. It is my opinion that children cannot fully appreciate concepts such as god, life, eternity, marxism, etc. Nor is it appropriate to expose children to such concepts as hell, revolution, damnation, the universe imploding, etc. I think it better to teach them how to ride a bike, be generous (for the sake of being good, not because of fear), how to swim, help them with homework, etc. Simple and effective parenting. No manipulation. No dogma.
cls wrote: » I totally agree but the problem arises when the child comes home talking about god and heaven and why isn't spot the dog allowed into heaven and crying because they did something bad and don't want to go to hell. Realistically, its not something you can avoid.
Flamed Diving wrote: » I repeat: I will teach my children that there are very many faiths in the world, and that no one can really know for sure. So just enjoy riding your bike around in circles and don't worry about it until you are an adult and are capable of making these decisions for yourself.
cls wrote: » Meanwhile other people will be doing a very good job at convincing them otherwise. I'd like to think your method would work though. Do you speak from experience? Do you have kids?
Flamed Diving wrote: » No. It is my opinion that children cannot fully appreciate concepts such as god, life, eternity, marxism, etc. Nor is it appropriate to expose children to such concepts as hell, revolution, damnation, the universe imploding, etc.
I think it better to teach them how to ride a bike, be generous (for the sake of being good, not because of fear), how to swim, help them with homework, etc.
Simple and effective parenting. No manipulation. No dogma.
cls wrote: » You teach someone based on facts to which they can and should question and doubt and scrutinize.
Indoctrinating cannot be scrutinized or questioned.
For example, this is the truth because its written in a big old book, end of story.
cls wrote: » You teach someone based on facts to which they can and should question and doubt and scrutinize. Indoctrinating cannot be scrutinized or questioned. For example, this is the truth because its written in a big old book, end of story.
liah wrote: » Would you teach them to be atheists like yourself and that all religions are glorified fairytales, or would you let them come to their own conclusions?
JimiTime wrote: » What is the difference between teaching, and indoctrinating?