athtrasna wrote: » Local Issues are more important in the local elections. Which is why it annoys the hell out of me that this whole Ogunsina thing is even a story!
athtrasna wrote: » Lots of Hussain's posters on the approach to the Phoenix Park. Would like to know more about him. As for the other candidates I'm involved in a number of community groups of different types. One candidate was verbally abusive to me at a meeting, they came over to me out of the blue and started spouting s*ite. Am hoping their canvassers come to visit!! The others, largely I've found they don't answer emails about local issues, requests for info etc. In one case the email bounced back because the Cllr's inbox was full. Only one councillor has been universally helpful so it's difficult to decide where to spread my preferences after that. At the same time I look forward to not voting for the abusive one, and perhaps voting tactically to reduce their chances
Cliste wrote: » Yea - that was me. And if I remember correctly you pointed out that local issues were more important This sounds juicy! What have the other candidates done to turn you off them? I actually saw posters from him up closer to the centre - I'm not sure if he knows that this side of the M50 is part of the area!
athtrasna wrote: » Any councillor/council candidate running for a political party faces questions on issues bigger than local politics. A poster on this thread earlier admitted they'd asked Eithne Loftus questions that had zero to do with D15. Adeola stated the party position. No crime there.
athtrasna wrote: » Saw some ads for Hussain in the local papers a while back. Might give him a preference purely as he's someone I haven't had a negative experience of so far in my time in D15, makes him one of the few candidates in the running this time!
Cliste wrote: » Athrasna, I don't know the exact wording of what he said - but surely as a local election candidate this passport issue should have absolutely nothing to do with the role of a councillor (And it was both the FF and 'Iggy' who denonced his methods according to the Blanch Gazette here). Further to the above Joe Higgins is running And apparently Hussain, Zahid (Ind) See the story here - has anyone heard anything about him either? That's 8 candidates anyway!
Cliste wrote: » And apparently Hussain, Zahid (Ind) See the story here - has anyone heard anything about him either?
Cliste wrote: » Right in the Castleknock Branch we've:Roderic O'Gorman (Greens): Called around - clear set of policies up on the website - activeEithne Loftus(FG): Has called around - active councillerCharlie Maples (SF) No Website - Nothing...Peggy Hamill (Lab) Seems to have been active - however its only at the elections I hear from herMags Murray (PD FF): No Website (That's the best I could find)Howard Mahoney (FF): Haven't heard of this guy - EVER.
athtrasna wrote: » It's a bad sign of the FF candidate IMO if he is focusing on tabloid-esque headline grabbing inaccuracies.
Thaedydal wrote: » Is it just me or do all the FF candidate posters only have FF in very small print right at the very bottom of the poster?http://www.communityvoice.ie/pages/CV136/CV136n11.htm Run down on the candidates.
daymobrew wrote: » The MiCandidate site lists 6 candidates for Castleknock/Blanchardstown.
daymobrew wrote: » Mulhuddart ward has 14!!
Cliste wrote: » Howard Mahoney (FF): Haven't heard of this guy - EVER. (Smell of Bacon:p)
Powerhouse wrote: » 3) The 'mod' raised the matter publicly. If there is fairness and transparency (and frankly I will be surprised if there is - I believe the mods tend to divert matters to the trademan's entrance when challenged) the inconsistency will be dealt with publicly. Let the 'mod' explain how 'useful' your snide remark about Howard Mahony was, and why it wasn't picked up on.
Powerhouse wrote: » Does this apply only to me or is it advice for others as well?
Cliste wrote: » I will admit that I am being unduly sceptical of Howard - I think this is a product of someone questioning why I don't know who he is. I might add that none of the other politicians really offer no better policies (Loftus has a bit better), the only thing is that I at least 'know' them already - Howard is an unproven person (to me). Given the alternative's he's in contention for third place as it stands!
daymobrew wrote: » Howard does mention three aims on his About page. I'll ping him to mention the absence of more information.
Cliste wrote: » 1) Well now to be fair why the hell would I know who he is - this is his first time going for election here, and I don't know the Gardai by name, don't live near Bramley, and while I do live in D15, I never heard of D15CC - which you will now go to say that I should - but then why should I? 2) I made a suggestion just before she left about the fact that I would like to see FG be a bit more pro-active in terms of the Irish language (ie having Polish on the site without any Irish is a bit insulting to me). She is also a member of FG (as well as being a current councillor) - I don't see the big problem with what I said, and it would do FG no harm at all to pull the finger out on this topic. 3) PM the Mod - or take it to the helpdesk rather then dragging the thread further away from the topic.
Thaedydal wrote: » Because you are posting in a manner which is antagonistic and snarky and that will be off putting people to may want to take part in this thread to share info and ask questions. You are being, to put it mildly, disruptive to the thread.
Cliste wrote: » He has outlined nothing about what he intends to do.
Powerhouse wrote: » Miniscule details? Why do you call fundamental information 'miniscule details'? We are talking about name, party and policy here - hardly miniscule details. You don't even have the basics - if, as you say, we are being honest here. So please be honest and try not to pretend that we are talking about what he had for breakfast.
Powerhouse wrote: » Incidentally, what did you ask Eithne Loftus about the Irish language? I'm just wondering what you see as an appropriate role for a local councillor in relation to the Irish language.
Powerhouse wrote: » The moderator said only "useful" stuff should be posted (whether its attempted humour or narky or whatever, or intended to be, is a different matter) so let him/her explain why that was useful, and me asking a perfectly legitimate question as to how someone is qualified to comment on the activity of a county councillor.*
Powerhouse wrote: » * The funny thing is that you actually dealt with this and answered it perfectly reaonably, which baffles me further as to why the moderator had an issue with the question.
Cliste wrote: » My comment was meant as a humorous jibe at the fact that he is a Garda Lets be honest here - I've only heard of the guy on this campaign, and even that is only what he has sent in his leaflets, and his website. He has outlined nothing about what he intends to do. I'm sure you'll have to forgive me for not knowing every minuscule detail of our local politicians - I waste my time doing other things in life.
Powerhouse wrote: » If pointing out that it is ridiculous that you said Howard Mahony was 'more active than you gave him credit for' when you acknowledged that you never heard of him is "attacking you" then yes, you are being viciously assaulted. You could lighten up of course.