durrus wrote: » Does it really matter who objected?
Freddie59 wrote: » This is almost surreal. You can sell what you like in the City Centre with impunity. Yet try to open a shop on the outskirts and a MAJOR retailer is punished. What message is this sending out to other retailers considering locating here. We are in the middle of a recession, heading for a depression. AND WE'RE DEBATING WHETHER OR NOT A SHOP CAN SELL CLOTHES. Moronic, imbecilic, and a host of like words come to mind. We had a Council Of Trade Unions, ably assisted by a member of the Green Party, stifling City Centre development. Now we're telling people they can't locate on the outskirts either. Way to go lads - way to go. A bunch of clowns.
sunnysoutheast wrote: » I can't believe all this panic over what is simply a discount retailer - they will be interested only in TK Maxx. Remember that many US towns and cities welcomed the arrival of Wal-Mart and their jobs - only to realise later that this was at the cost of their city centres.
sunnysoutheast wrote: » I can't believe all this panic over what is simply a discount retailer - they will be interested only in TK Maxx. Remember that many US towns and cities welcomed the arrival of Wal-Mart and their jobs - only to realise later that this was at the cost of their city centres. SSE
dannydiamond wrote: » This is about as absurd and irrelevant as comparisons get.
Cabaal wrote: » Wal-Mart is one store that became a once stop shop for EVERYTHING, not exactly the same thing
The board, in a ruling issued last week, found that TK Maxx at the Butlerstown Retail Park did not have permission to sell items such as clothes, toys and shoes because they do not meet a "bulky goods" classification.
Council takes action against TK Maxx store over planning contravention By Ciaran Murphy WATERFORD County Council has commenced enforcement proceedings against a TK Maxx outlet in Waterford after An Bord Pleanála found it had contravened planning laws. The board, in a ruling issued last week, found that TK Maxx at the Butlerstown Retail Park did not have permission to sell items such as clothes, toys and shoes because they do not meet a "bulky goods" classification. Sixty jobs at the store are now under threat, it is feared. An Bord Pleanála investigated the sale of items at TK Maxx, following a complaint by local developer Noel Frisby, a director of Noel Frisby Construction Ltd who has interests in the Lisduggan Shopping Centre. The board ruled that TK Maxx, along with a Mothercare outlet that was due to open at the park, contravened planning laws, as outlets at the park can only sell items that are deemed to be "bulky". A spokeswoman for TK Maxx yesterday said: "We are extremely disappointed by this ruling. It is a very complex situation and we are currently working to find a resolution that will be in the very best interests of our store associates and our customers in Waterford." Director of services at Waterford County Council, Brian White, said that the council had deemed Mothercare to be within the bulky goods classification. "We are certainly working out the options with them and are trying to reach some conclusion that will save [those] jobs." Mr White said the options that are there for TK Maxx were to "defend the case against them in court, to apply for planning permission for retention, or to look for some alternative solution". However, Waterford’s county councillors expressed anger at the monthly meeting of the local authority on Monday evening and passed a motion of no confidence in An Bord Pleanála. Waterford county councillor Pat Daly said: "One job is a lot to lose at the moment, but if we can protect, in any way, sixty jobs, it is the duty of all of us here to do it." The Mayor of Co Waterford Tom Higgins criticised Mr Frisby at the meeting. He asked Mr White: "It is a bit rich, a Kilkenny man coming in, telling us what to do, isn’t it?" Mr White replied: "Mayor, with respect, any member of the public has a right to insist that the planning regulations are enforced." Proposals to rezone the land were considered unlikely to succeed. Cllr John Carey added: "I have the utmost respect for Waterford planning and I think it is high time now that we called for disbanding of An Bord Pleanála because they’re certainly not doing us any favours." In response Cllr Damian Geoghan said: "If we go along with the proposals [for a vote of no confidence] today, what we are saying is that there should be no appeals process in this country in relation to planning." A spokesman with An Bord Pleanála yesterday confirmed that it "ruled that TK Maxx does not have the correct planning permission for what it is proposing".
Sully wrote: » Source: http://www.examiner.ie/ireland/idgbmhsngb/rss2/ I agree with the Board. Clothes are hardly "bulky goods". Mothercare is borderline, but they sell clothes aswel as some slightly bulky goods. I think the Board should be doing a vote of no confidence against the council seeing as the problem would seem to lie with them. Seen the same problem in Tramore and similar comments.
robtri wrote: » how does this become the councils fault, this is soley TK Maxx's fault, you can't blame the council cause TK Maxx didn't read the conditions of opening up in that retail park.....
Freddie59 wrote: » Any TK Maxx in Ireland is usually located in out of town developments in Ireland. Imagine if this attitude (or similar) had been rolled out across the country. No Liffey Valley.....no Blanch....no Dundrum.http://www.tkmaxx.com/storefinder.php
Sully wrote: » Had a glimpse at the local papers today. The county council did a vote of no confedence against the board after they refused two developments: Argos and Mother Care. The board claimed the land wasnt zoned correctly (a similar reason they have given in the past about developments in Tramore). They also said they had to act against TKMaxx and will work for a resolution but said it was unlikely.
JLemmon wrote: » Yeah I was going to say this, is it only waterford that these planning issues exist? Take the Mahon point complex in cork, they have everything for sale there, so what's the deal? How does this affect Next and Tesco, and even Paddy Brownes centre? Non-bulky planning permission? They are hardly city centre locations. All the while the Waterford Retail Park in 6 cross roads sits empty, is this a bulky item only location? If not sure can't TK Maxx, Argos and mothercare jump in there? Outside of more DIY places there is not many bulky shops, what's bulky about Halfords & Home Focus?
meldrew wrote: » One of the objectors to the T K Maxx is a well known local property developer and now shopping centre owner who is no stranger to having to apply for retention of planning permission , I seem to recall he was told to knock houses and a wall which are still standing the last time I looked .
Sully wrote: » I wouldnt get carried away in thinking Newgate will be the best in the country. I could be wrong, but is it the largest retail space in Ireland for such stores? It also does depend on who moves in there.
Trotter wrote: » I hope they leave TK Maxx alone, build more out of town shopping, and clean Waterford city centre up so maybe people might actually want to go there to spend money.
sunnysoutheast wrote: » there won't be any tax revenue to clean up the City centre
sunnysoutheast wrote: » Another major consideration is that many of these out-of-town developments are completely inaccessible by public transport, not everybody has access to a car. SSE
sunnysoutheast wrote: » No it isn't. The detrimental impact of out-of-town retail growth on city centres is well known - you can Google it as well as I can. This is exactly the same issue, just on a smaller scale. I don't have any axe to grind with TK Maxx and I am not a flagbearer for anyone else, I simply want to see a compact city centre busy and thriving. Inappropriate out-of-town car-dependent development is not the way to go about it. Many cities around the world have proved this, but we seem determined not to learn from the mistakes others have made. Anyway, not much point debating this further until the facts are established one way or the other. SSE
KingLoser wrote: » Nah, Pandora's box can only be opened. It is a wonder why the complaint was lodged really, seems kinda petty.