free_the_paedos wrote: » Someone inferior and uncivilised of lower income. It is perfectly acceptable to treat these people in an uncivilised manner. In fact behaviour normally associated with "scumbags" is perfectly acceptable when performed against those of lower income. If you beat up a "scumbag" you will be applauded by us middle class folk.] You don't need logic when you've got the majority!
jackncoke wrote: » Watch part 1 and 2
Terry wrote: » Jesus. Is this the sort of person TCD is producing at the moment?
KieranKennedy wrote: » Anyone who doesn't think
Alaia Pitiful Medal wrote: » What's TCD? Less intelligent people are scumbags? hmm... I bought 4 cans of beer with my dole money, I must be a scumbag, right?
Highsider wrote: » Anyone who works in the banking sector. Or finance
Dudess wrote: » Someone who robs, assaults, threatens, terrorises vulnerable people, makes their community a miserable place to live, doesn't give a sh1t about anyone and goes out of their way to prove it - e.g. keeping people awake until the wee hours by joyriding stolen cars around the neighbourhood, setting fire to people's pets, making their neighbourhoods no-go areas for outsiders. Someone who won't bother looking for a job, who spends their dole on booze, who reproduces habitually and creates yet another miserable life for their offspring. And it's not an anti-poor person phrase. The majority of scumbags do seem to come from poor areas but that's immaterial. Doesn't mean most poor people are scumbags. And some people from "respectable" areas can be scumbags.
Duck's hoop wrote: » Correct, impecunious indigent.
longshanks wrote: » kerry katona