SimpleSam06 wrote: » Parking for 30,000. Think about it.
SimpleSam06 wrote: » I'd wager those stadiums come with adequate parking facilities, however.
KevR wrote: » Therefore, I personally doubt very much that there will be anywhere near 30,000 cars in the vicinity on any given match day.
Reece Curved Tutu wrote: » I would gladly take your wager as they do not. Just as a example the emirates stadium were Arsenal play does not have a car park atall and of all the stadiums which I have visited, Anfield, Stamford bridge and the emirates to name a few have had at most parking for the players and maybe a few VIP's if any parking atall.
SimpleSam06 wrote: » maybe if they put the car park on the east side or just laid on buses from the square?
skelliser wrote: » imo its scaremongering/not in my back garden rubbish being pushed by some residents on rockbarton road, last season there was only 2/3 major matches. Have a bit of pride in the jersey! sure dont they get all the free tickets they want!
BTH wrote: » If you live in a city you have to live with the consequences as well as the benefits. A city is all about having a mixture of uses and functions operating side by side. Sports stadiums are one of those uses and it's not unreasonable to expect a Sports Stadium to develop and improve as time goes on such as installing floodlights. If you can't deal with having such facilities that serve the whole community "in your backyard" then move. It's like someone choosing to live on Quay Street complaining about noise from the pubs...
Sconsey wrote: » Your argument works both ways....if the GAA choose to put a stadium in a resedintial area they have to live with the consequences....the planning laws for the area state that the light levels for a resedential area cannot exceed certain values, the floodlights would exceed those values....the GAA should have considred all this before developing a stadium in a resedential area, if the GAA can't deal with if they should move somewhere else.
BTH wrote: » Pearse Stadium was opened as Galway's county ground in 1957. Most of the houses in the vicinity were built afterwards.
Sconsey wrote: » So it's not a resedential area?
SimpleSam06 wrote: » Eh much as I realise that change is not part of the remit of the fossils in charge of the GAA, you can't deal with residential and planning issues on a first come first serve basis. The fact is there is a huge residential community in the area now, and their needs must be taken into consideration, and they have to come before those of a sports association.
BTH wrote: » Another comparison - it's like choosing to live overlooking the docks then complaining about the noise from their workings or that the Volvo Boat Race is going to disrupt their lives in some way (as I've heard from some people). Ridiculous.
JohnCleary wrote: » .... they live by the docks - Who are you kidding? You choose to live in a commercial area of the city where work is carried out 24/7 (mainly due to tidal restrictions) and you seek compensation/expect people to only work certain hours? Docks was there longgggg before any apartments in that area
BTH wrote: » It's a mixed-use area. Residential AND sportsground. Anyone who has ever built or bought a house in the area has known well that they will have the Galway county GAA ground to contend with.
skelliser wrote: » 14 stories high, me hole! lets put this into context: Are you honestly saying that these lights will be taller then liberty hall in dublin ffs!! 14 stories is more then twice as high as the eyre square shopping centre carpark!!your havin a laugh i doubt theres any floodlights in europe that are anywhere near 14 stories high. you've taken scaremongering to new heights! pardon the pun!
micmclo wrote: » OT but they were a very interesting documentary on TG4 a few weeks back. Tidal restrictions realy hamper Galway port so there are plans for a deep water port in Rossaveal (sorry, poor spelling) I know this was proposed years ago but it looks pretty certain and can be done at a fraction of developing a similar port in Galway Twas interesting
JohnCleary wrote: » What would have been a great idea would have been to lay oil pipes when they were building the sewage treatment plant so that at least the fuel tankers could unload there, as there's deep water right up to the shore of Mutton Island. This had been thought out, but uproar from a certain local residents group threw that plan out the window
Sconsey wrote: » Wrong, the city developmet plan describes it as a mature residential suburb.
micmclo wrote: » That's the first thing I've heard or even considered that idea. It's simple and brilliant. Fair play to who came up with it! Who could object? People don't want to see tankers stopping for a few hours in their line of sight?
Sconsey wrote: » Have you actually looked at the plans? I have and the engineering plans put them at a total heigth of 39 metres. Do you know the heigth of an average storey in a building? it's about 2.8 - 3 metres. Do the math. You should really check your facts before accusing people of scaremongering.
Sconsey wrote: » You should really check your facts before accusing people of scaremongering.
BTH wrote: » I happen to disagree. I'll repeat. Anyone who has built or bought a house in the area must have been fully aware that an adjacent major sporting facility was part of the deal.
BTH wrote: » They should have built or bought somewhere else if the existence and development of said facility was going to be a problem.
BTH wrote: » it's like choosing to live overlooking the docks then complaining about the noise from their workings or that the Volvo Boat Race is going to disrupt their lives in some way (as I've heard from some people).
BTH wrote: » planners WILL take into account that Pearse Stadium was the first land use in the area and that residents knew it was there all along.
BTH wrote: » People need to get a grip and stop allowing the snobbish GAA-hating element in the locality
BTH wrote: » What the locals should be doing is trying to make sure that when these floodlights go in that they are the most high-tech, perfectly focussed with minimal "spillage" models that are available
skelliser wrote: » liberty hall in dublin is 16storeys at 60metres height. county hall in cork is 17 storeys at 67metres high. 39 metres does not equal 14 storeys. Average height in a tall building per floor is 11/12 foot, you need to include the floor and ceiling. I said it already, these floodlights will be equivalent in height to the ones at the sports ground.