nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Evolution Theory is Error

Gareth37

Scientifically the theory of evolution is incorrect, it was theory put forward by Darwin over one hundred years ago and since that nobody has proved this theory but in fact evidence exists that the theory has no basis whatsoever:

Proteins cannot form in the oceans because the reaction in which two amino acids bond together releases a water molecule. According to the Le Châtelier Principle, it is not possible for a reaction that releases water to take place in a hydrate environment.

Neither could they produce a single useful amino acid or protein, nor could they prove – despite thousands of experiments – that mutations can have beneficial effects and cause evolution.

Modern technology has allowed humans to discover some aspects of the cell. What was thought to be a murky lump during the time of Darwin has been discovered to be an unimaginably complex system.

Now I am a scientist by profession but science should not be abused in this way.

http://www.albalagh.net/kids/science/evolution.shtml

Find more posts tagged with

evolution

Quick Links

Comments

Gareth37

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaKryi3605g&feature=related

He looks pretty real to me

Mitch Connor

Galvasean wrote: »

Are they mentioned in the Bible?
There's your answer.

don't know about blackjuck but i would reckon the whores of babylon would be the hookers.

Galvasean

Gareth37 wrote: »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaKryi3605g&feature=related

Pretty cool how you post a video that proves the point I just made.

Tar.Aldarion

Gareth37 wrote: »

Now I am a scientist by profession but science should not be abused in this way.

Food science, computer science?

Gareth37

Galvasean wrote: »

Pretty cool how you post a video that proves the point I just made.

So can you answer the question?

Mitch Connor

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXdQRvSdLAs&feature=related

Gareth37

Here is another decent site which shows even more flaws in the theory:
http://www.epm.org/artman2/publish/creation_evolution/Ten_Major_Flaws_of_Evolution_-_Revised.shtml

and more
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-misconceptions.html

In fact there are so many doubts its like saying that the world is flat

Bottle_of_Smoke

What's your profession Gareth37?

robindch

Tar.Aldarion wrote: »

Food science, computer science?

Nah, christian science.

Dades

Galvasean wrote: »

We'll build our own Creationism thread, even bigger than the one in Christianity.

Well we have all the ingredients...

Enthusiastic adherents to science - CHECK
Creationism adherent who ignores rebuttals and replies with new questions - CHECK

Hivemind187

Tar.Aldarion wrote: »

Food science, computer science?

Pseudo science I'm guessing.

Hivemind187

Dades wrote: »

Well we have all the ingredients...

Enthusiastic adherents to science - CHECK
Creationism adherent who ignores rebuttals and replies with new questions - CHECK

Best Xmas pressie evar

Galvasean

Gareth37 wrote: »

So can you answer the question?

You didn't ask one!

Gareth37

Mitch Connor wrote: »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXdQRvSdLAs&feature=related

So tell me this. If we came for Monkeys this must mean that one day Monkeys will also become human?

So that means that every animal on this planet will eventually become human?

That is what you are saying here right, that man came from Monkeys? So Monkeys will also become man? Why did some Monkeys become man quicker than others and why are Monkeys showing no sign of evoluting further?

I think you have been watching too much planet of the apes

robindch

Gareth37 wrote: »

why are Monkeys showing no sign of evoluting further?

Been studying this "evoluting" thing for long, have we?

keane2097

Gareth37 wrote: »

So tell me this. If we came for Monkeys this must mean that one day Monkeys will also become human?

So that means that every animal on this planet will eventually become human?

That is what you are saying here right, that man came from Monkeys? So Monkeys will also become man? Why did some Monkeys become man quicker than others and why are Monkeys showing no sign of evoluting further?

I think you have been watching too much planet of the apes

You should read the article posted earlier about bacteria evolving and try to understand the theory before you call it lies.

You haven't a clue what you're on about and I'm almost 100% sure you're a troll.

Malari

Gareth37 wrote: »

So tell me this. If we came for Monkeys this must mean that one day Monkeys will also become human?

So that means that every animal on this planet will eventually become human?

That is what you are saying here right, that man came from Monkeys? So Monkeys will also become man? Why did some Monkeys become man quicker than others and why are Monkeys showing no sign of evoluting further?

I think you have been watching too much planet of the apes

Come on Gareth, these leaps are bigger than any of the faith variety I've ever seen.

Can you answer the question that has been asked about a dozen times already - what kind of scientist are you?

Mitch Connor

Gareth37 wrote: »

Here is another decent site which shows even more flaws in the theory:
http://www.epm.org/artman2/publish/creation_evolution/Ten_Major_Flaws_of_Evolution_-_Revised.shtml

and more
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-misconceptions.html

In fact there are so many doubts its like saying that the world is flat

Tripe.

In the first link.

'Facts' 1 and 2 are just an argument of incredulity. Just because you can't explain it, doesn't make it supernatural.

Fact 3 - E-coli Cit+

Fact 4 - deliberately misuses the law of entropy. the world is NOT A CLOSED SYSTEM. and the law is for a CLOSED system, not an open or closed system as your precious site states.

gave up reading after that blatant lie.

Gareth37

All Dawkins and co are doing is making money of people foolish enough to beleive their dribble. Selling books, going to talks, seminars etc. Making money

People say here than God cannot be proved but yet they accept some money making theory that doesn't actually make full scientific sense even. That to me is strange

Mitch Connor

Gareth37 wrote: »

So tell me this. If we came for Monkeys this must mean that one day Monkeys will also become human?

So that means that every animal on this planet will eventually become human?

That is what you are saying here right, that man came from Monkeys? So Monkeys will also become man? Why did some Monkeys become man quicker than others and why are Monkeys showing no sign of evoluting further?

I think you have been watching too much planet of the apes

Do you watch the stuff you yourself posted?

We didn't come from monkeys. Monkeys are an evolution of a common ancestor.

Gareth37 wrote: »

Here is another decent site which shows even more flaws in the theory:
http://www.epm.org/artman2/publish/creation_evolution/Ten_Major_Flaws_of_Evolution_-_Revised.shtml

and more
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-misconceptions.html

In fact there are so many doubts its like saying that the world is flat

Arrrrgh the fiend ... he's using "talk origins" faqs to bolster *his* side of the argument, meaning we can only use aig and creationist websites to defend evolution. Very clever! I'm sure even J C didn't come up with this brilliant move.

CerebralCortex

Gareth37 wrote: »

So tell me this. If we came for Monkeys this must mean that one day Monkeys will also become human?

So that means that every animal on this planet will eventually become human?

That is what you are saying here right, that man came from Monkeys? So Monkeys will also become man? Why did some Monkeys become man quicker than others and why are Monkeys showing no sign of evoluting further?

I think you have been watching too much planet of the apes

You could ask questions in the other direction, like why if creationism is true are there so many different breeds of dogs which came from wolves, hyenas, jackals, foxes, etc. Did a creator decide it would like us to have pit bulls? Or is it actually just a human perversion/hijacking of natural selection?

Mitch Connor

Gareth37 wrote: »

All Dawkins and co are doing is making money of people foolish enough to beleive their dribble. Selling books, going to talks, seminars etc. Making money

People say here than God cannot be proved but yet they accept some money making theory that doesn't actually make full scientific sense even. That to me is strange

evolutionary theory is used everyday, and proven to be accurate ever day in medical and computer science.

Mitch Connor

pH wrote: »

Arrrrgh the fiend ... he's using "talk origins" faqs to bolster *his* side of the argument, meaning we can only use aig and creationist websites to defend evolution. Very clever! I'm sure even J C didn't come up with this brilliant move.

i don't think he read the second link himself

TheIrishGrover

Gareth37 wrote: »

All Dawkins and co are doing is making money of people foolish enough to beleive their dribble. Selling books, going to talks, seminars etc. Making money

Well, I suppose you got us there: No church has ever made money from followers...................
Substitute the words "The Church" (ANY church) for "Dawkins" and reread

qt9ukbg60ivjrn

Gareth37 wrote: »

why are Monkeys showing no sign of evoluting further?

I think you have been watching too much planet of the apes

evolution happens over a huge periods of time, that was idiotic to ask that question, you're not even playing by any rules, darwins theory was based on examination of fossils and others things to, he didn't just look at a bird for 10 days and note the changes

you are not a scientist

saml1

Gareth37 wrote: »

So can you answer the question?

It is important to try and understand something before you knock it or discredit it and Gareth37 I doubt you have even tried to actually grasp the theory of evolution. I'd even bet you haven't put much effort into understanding your religions stance on the matter. You seem poorly informed either way from your comments and line of questioning, and are biased towards creationism and the existance of a god, so your opinions and conjecture shouldn't be given much merit.

All too often the most ill-informed remarks begin with something like "I'm not a scientist, but..."

Gareth37

keane2097 wrote: »

You should read the article posted earlier about bacteria evolving and try to understand the theory before you call it lies.

You haven't a clue what you're on about and I'm almost 100% sure you're a troll.

Only God knows, thats why science fails.

Even if one were to accept evolution, do you not think that there was something before evolution and what before that? So before all these things how was the first thing ever in the Universe created but then I hear myself say, what about before that. This is beyond human, it is supernatural. Denying the supernatural is denying that a concept behond the human mind exists and we all realise that there is something that science cannot explain. So I cannot accept evolution even and other theories for God is the creator in one way or another.

At the very very start of what we are living in there must have been something supernatural for the concept of the human mind cannot explain how nothing was turned into something and Im 100% sure that God is the supernatural.

syklops

Gareth37 wrote: »

All Dawkins and co are doing is making money of people foolish enough to beleive their dribble. Selling books, going to talks, seminars etc. Making money

LOL

And how much did the catholic church make last year?

Gareth37 wrote: »

People say here than God cannot be proved but yet they accept some money making theory that doesn't actually make full scientific sense even. That to me is strange

If you can show me one hint of proof of the existence of god, I will swear allegiance to him right now. Just one small speck of proof that he exists. But you cant.

Not to mention you have not uttered one shred of scientific sense yourself. Not even which part of science you study.

Domestic Scientist perhaps?

TheIrishGrover

Gareth37 wrote: »

Only God knows, thats why science fails.

:eek: Facepalm