nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

6.5 BILLION DEVELOPER BAIL OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Deleted User]

2Pack wrote:

Home Choice is yet another scheme to be run by the HFA , http://www.hfa.ie .

The NTMA raises all its fund for it on debt markets . http://www.ntma.ie

It had €3.5bn worth of schemes on the go in March 2008 ( pre digout) . Local authority and sheltered and housing association builds where the HFA funded councils who funded the work. Then it was decided that it would run Homechoice .

Finneran stated that the funding of the HFA was to rise to €6bn and then €10bn but that is on top of the ' legitimate ' €3.5bn it started the year with .

The difference between €3.5bn and €6bn is €2.5bn
The difference between €3.5bn and €10bn is €6.5bn

The Developer Bailout, therefore, is to cost between €2.5bn and €6.5bn according to the housing minister in charge of the HFA

more info
http://www.environ.ie/en/DevelopmentandHousing/Housing/PublicationsDocuments/FileDownLoad,17193,en.pdf

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

[Deleted User]

2Pack wrote:

I posted this in one of our Frank Fahey threads

http://www.thepropertypin.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=14766&p=147347#p147347

This is the Housing Finance agency 'homechoice' scheme which uses the NTMA to raise its finance and sell on its debt like all other government debt .

Finneran seemingly stated that he would take the HFA PORTION of the National Debt to €10bn .

Page 37 of this document here from the NTMA

http://www.ntma.ie/Publications/2008/NTMA_Memorandum_Info_March08.pdff

Implies Strongly that total HFA debt was €3.5bn in March 2008 although the €3.5bn is described as commercial paper which is usually short term debt and not 30 year term like a mortgage . This means it needs to be rolled over and refinanced regularly .

Furthermore the paper is EXPLICITLY identified when sold by the NTMA so that sub prime backed paper can easily be spotted on the capital markets . This CP funding envelope was about €2.5bn in 2005 and had grown somewhat in recent years to €3.5bn

No other HFA funding programmes are listed on page 37 of that doc so that may have been it ...in March 2008 anyway .

Finneran stated in Galway that this overall HFA funding envelope would become MINIMUM €6bn and MAXIMUM €10bn meaning an increase of €2.5Bn ( min) or of €6.5Bn ( max) on the national debt to finance developer bailouts .

also see page 24 of this pdf

http://www.ntma.ie/Publications/2005/Annual_Report_2005.pdf

from the propertypin

abouttobebanned

this is far too intelligent for this forum.

[Deleted User]

With so many exclamation marks I thought this was going to be epic.

I'm severely disappointed

[Deleted User]

http://www.thepropertypin.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=14827&start=0
^^^^^^^^^^^
HOW TO PREVENT THE COUNTRY FROM BEING SUNK:

kerrynorth wrote:

OPERATION DIGOUT: Instructions for submitting template complaint online.

Go to http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/forms/sa_complaint_en.html

1. Select: Directorate General for Competition.

2. Complete the information required. You may select either you wish for your identity to be revealed or not, that is up to yourself.

3. a) Ireland b) In Central Government enter: Housing Finance Agency.

4. Write in the following:

a) The proposed scheme that is the matter of this complaint was announced by the Government of Ireland on October 14th, 2008.

b) Potentially between €2.5billion and €6.5billion is to be made available by teh Government of Ireland in the form of loans to residential property purchasers who must purchase their property from certain defined vendors to the exclusion of other vendors in the marketplace.

c) The main beneficiaries are those firms of Residential Developers whom have built New Build Dwellings in Ireland and who are also likely to have a crossover membership with the Construction Industry Federation (CIF) of Ireland.

d) This aid is been given for the benefit of Residential Developers whom have a large overhang of unsold New Build Dwellings in Ireland estimated at circa 40,000 units by various sources and also to artificially prop up residential housing values in a declining market.

5. Copy and paste template complaint as provided below.

6.

a) The alleged aid does not affect my personal interests directly, but indirectly the alleged aid will add to the National Debt that is ultimately repayable by all citizens and may prolong the deflation of the property bubble to the detriment of Irish society as a whole.

b) As pointed out in the grounds of complaint: the New Build residential housing market is advantaged to the detriment of the second hand and self-build segments of the market; competing mortgage providers are disadvantaged; and, mortgage providers whom are headquartered in other Member States are disadvantaged.

7. Select 'No' for both a) and b).

8. Select 'Yes'.

9. Leave blank.

Press Send

All done! 8DD

marcsignal

Fcuking disgrace !

The next time i overhear someone say they are a property developer, i'm going to develop an irresistable urge to punch them in the face :mad:

[Deleted User]

Template for complaint:

kerrynorth wrote:

COMPLAINT REGARDING UNLAWFUL STATE AID
UNDER ARTICLES 87(1) (2) OF THE EC TREATY

According to the EC “by giving certain firms or products favoured treatment to the detriment of other firms or products, state aid seriously disrupts normal competitive forces” and it is respectfully submitted that the scheme announced by the Government of Ireland on October 14th, 2008, to provide commercial residential mortgages via the Housing Finance Agency, an agency controlled by the Government of Ireland, constitutes unlawful state aid, contrary Articles 87 (1) (2) of the EC Treaty.

The scheme to provide commercial residential mortgages through the Housing Finance Agency (HFA) (http://www.homechoiceloan.ie) breaches the competition law of the EC in these respects: it constitutes a clear distortion of competition; and, it falls outside the scope of the Housing Finance Agency state aid block exemption (State Aid N89/2004 – Ireland).

DISTORTION OF COMPETITION

The proposed scheme would distort the free functioning of the residential housing market in Ireland in a number of respects:

a. Distortion of market in favour of New Build only .
b. Subsidisation of certain Residential Developers together with A failure to ensure that these subsidised entities do not then distort other EU markets .
c. Interference with the EU Internal Banking Market and Market Discrimination against other Member State mortgage product provider entities operating in Ireland .

1. The central condition underlining the operation and rational of this scheme is that only New Build Dwellings qualify for the provision of subsidised mortgage finance – to the exclusion of the second hand and self-build segments of the residential housing market. A further condition is that only new build dwellings that are registered as being covered by certain insurance schemes qualify for these mortgages.

2. The impact of these restrictions on access to the finance for these mortgages via the HFA is that it advantages certain defined vendors in the residential housing market in Ireland to the exclusion of others for no other reason than that this scheme has been designed from the outset to advantage a defined cohort of vendors in the market, to the exclusion of other vendors.

The defined cohort of vendors that this scheme seeks to give a competitive advantage to over all other sellers in the marketplace are Residential Developers who will also have a predominant crossover membership with the Construction Industry Federation (CIF) of Ireland, and will be predominantly companies based in the Republic of Ireland. In contrast to the above specified conditions the Energy Rating Directive (EU Directive 2002/91/EC) has been disregarded in its entirety.

Many of these Residential Developers have operations in other Member States which will also benefit from this subsidy in Ireland and in some cases to the detriment of other Residential Developers in those states .

This scheme errs in that it does not require Accounting Separation of subsidised Irish entities from supposedly unsubsidised entities, owned by the same Residential Developers, in other Member States

3. The proposed scheme also has the potential to distort competition and trade between Member States, and is therefore incompatible with the common market as a number of entities headquartered in other Member States who also offer commercial residential mortgage products in the Irish market.

These adversely affected entities include, but are not limited to, Ulster Bank and First Active (parent Royal Bank of Scotland, UK), Halifax Bank of Scotland (parent HBOS, UK), IIB Homeloans (parent KBC Group, the Netherlands), and the National Irish Bank (parent Danske Bank Group, Denmark).

4. The proposed scheme will also disadvantage commercial mortgage providers to the residential market in Ireland. It is proposed to market the HFA mortgages through mortgage intermediaries where the HFA provided mortgages will be competing side by side with mortgage products from commercial residential mortgage providers:

The HFA provided mortgages will have a competitive advantage in this marketplace due to the fact that the HFA, as a State body, can access finance in the marketplace cheaper than other competitor mortgage providers (Irish government backed borrowing is AAA rated);

it can offer mortgage intermediaries greater incentives than competitor entities (Note: in Ireland it is the convention that the mortgage provider and not the mortgagor who pays the mortgage intermediary for arranging the mortgage product);

and, the HFA can, and is indeed marketing the HomeChoiceLoan mortgage product, on the basis that it can and will offer mortgages at a higher Loan to Value (LTV) than what a competitor commercial mortgage provider is presently prepared to offer, or considers prudent, in current marketplace conditions.

5. There is also the added issue of the fact that the Government of Ireland proposes to place two Directors on the boards and credit committees of the financial undertakings that avail of the States' Deposit and Liabilities guarantee scheme (S.I. No. 411 of 2008 Credit Institutions (Financial Support) Scheme 2008) including all the major commercial residential mortgage product providers in Ireland.

6. The proposed scheme will also have the effect of placing an artificial 'floor price' on residential property values in Ireland and thereby distort the free and fair functioning of the marketplace. This can be achieved through the 'comparative method of valuation' that is the valuation industry norm for assessing the valuation of residential properties. This is achieved whereby the sale price of a property in a particular estate, location, or of a particular type sets a 'price standard' that both buyers and sellers use as a gauge of open market value. As the HFA mortgages of up to 92% LTV have a higher LTV than what is commercially available for particular residential mortgage types (e.g. a typical commercial mortgage for apartments would be circa 80% LTV) the mortgagor will have a greater 'ability to pay' than is presently the case in a fair and open marketplace. Accordingly, the market can be distorted via the HFA mortgages by placing an artificial 'floor price' on residential properties in Ireland.

7. The government has also indicated that they are prepared to extend the HFA's borrowing limit by anywhere between €2.5billion-6.5billion to €6-10billion from its' present €3.5billion to fund this and the Affordable Housing scheme. This scale of funding will make the Government of Ireland the single largest provider of new commercial residential mortgages (as distinct from refinancing mortgages) in the Irish market over the coming years as at a time that commercial providers are retrenching and replenishing their capital base.

HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY BLOCK EXEMPTION N89/2004

Under the terms of its state aid block exemption (State Aid N89/2004 – Ireland) the HFA is generally permitted to provide home loans to “disadvantaged households” in need of “social housing” in order to fulfil public policy objectives. However, the proposed HomeChoiceLoan scheme does not constitute 'social housing' for 'disadvantaged households'. The proposed mortgage scheme contains conditions that specify a MINIMUM income requirement of €40,000 pa (compared to an average industrial wage nationally of circa €34,000), however, there is no maximum level of income in order to be excluded from the proposed scheme. This is in stark contrast to the existing Local Authority Mortgage Scheme which specifies a MAXIMUM income of €36,800 for a single person, and €92,000 for a couple subject to a maximum of 2.5 times the main earners salary and once the secondary earners.

At its upper mortgage limit of a €285,000 a mortgagor would require a gross income of circa €85,000 to qualify on the maximum repayment of 35% of net income requirement (5.4% 30 year mortgage = €1600/month less tax relief plus stress testing) as specified under N89/2004. A gross income of €85,000 pa is the equivalent of circa 2.5times the average industrial wage. For comparative purposes a member of Dail Eireann (the Irish Parliament) receives a salary of circa €100,000 pa.

Accordingly, under the terms of this scheme, and that of the N89/2004 block exemption. a household headed by a member of Dail Eireann would have to be considered as a 'disadvantaged household' in 'social housing' need in order to avail of this scheme under the existing N89/2004 state aid block exemption. Clearly, by any definition this is an unsustainable contention in accordance with state aid regulations, and accordingly, this scheme cannot be considered to come under the scope of the HFA state aid block exemption N89/2004. Also, if a Member State fails to give notification of aid that does not qualify for an exemption of the notification procedure under one of the block-exemption regulations, or the de minimus regulation, and which does not come within the scope an existing aid scheme which has been approved by the Commission, the aid must be disqualified as unqualified aid.

For the reasons set out above, it is submitted that the proposed measures must be considered to be unqualified aid and therefore must be disqualified under Article 87 (1) (2) of the EC Treaty.

[Deleted User]

tl;dr

[Deleted User]

abouttobebanned wrote: »

this is far too intelligent for this forum.

yeah but we need numbers and this forum has em

Deleted User wrote: »

With so many exclamation marks I thought this was going to be epic.

I'm severely disappointed

be epic when your payin 60% income tax to service the national debt and wont be able to retire. At all. Ever.

EPIC FAIL there buddy

miju

I've thrown in a complaint anyways

[Deleted User]

Deleted User wrote: »

yeah but we need numbers and this forum has em

be epic when your payin 60% income tax to service the national debt and wont be able to retire. At all. Ever.

EPIC FAIL there buddy

Whats to say that I'm going to be staying in this country?

Gran Hermano

If I send in a complaint and use a REALLY BIG font will it look more important?

[Deleted User]

Gran Hermano wrote: »

If I send in a complaint and use a REALLY BIG font will it look more important?

probably

joe@rte.ie (Joe Duffy)
drivetime@rte.ie

morningireland@rte.ie

lastword@todayfm.com

therighthook@newstalk.ie