Hungrycol wrote: Remember folks it's only something you can get once every 5 years although if you change employments I don't know how that can be monitored.
Stark wrote: » You keep the same PPS number as you move from job to job so they'll be able to monitor it that way.
HJ Simpson wrote: » Which department is running this scheme is it the Dept of Finance or Dept of Environment. I just checked both sites and cant see any details. ?
rubadub wrote: » I still don't get this 5 year bit. Do you have to submit all receipts at once? Is there a time limit?
rubadub wrote: » For somebody on a borderline higer tax bracket they might wait a few years for a pay rise so they can avail of the higher tax bracket too.
rubadub wrote: » I expect I would be buying my bike online via credit card, would I just be handing in a C/C statement with the euro amount.
rubadub wrote: » If my bike gets nicked in the first the month I get it (highly likely!), am I obliged to get another and cycle it to work for the next 5 years? That is another loophole open to be exploited, lad cycles to work on his sons bike a few times so the accounts say it is legit, and then claims it was nicked. Maybe the gardai will actually have to take bike theft seriously for once!
Lumen wrote: » I think you're overcomplicating. This is not a right to a never ending source of tax-free bikes. It's a one-in-5-years tax-free benefit. If you lose it, you can buy another, but don't expect tax relief on it.
Hungrycol wrote: » How long is a piece of string? That's probably like saying I'll wait a few years before I buy a PC cos they'll be better then. (sorry don't mean to sound sarky)
rubadub wrote: » Somebody might actually ask for a bonus to be deffered until the next year to exploit it. The company would also benefit by the deffered payment.
Groe wrote: » Anyone know when it finishes?
Golfanatic wrote: » does anyone know how much you can claim from insurance? if it was knicked do u claim 1000 or 500?
Beasty wrote: » The fact you may have paid less because of the cycle to work schme should not make any difference.
Beasty wrote: » There are no plans to stop the scheme. Hence it continues indefinitely, unless the politicians change their mind about its benefits (which is unlikely, given the relatively low cost involved, how popular the scheme is, and the positive publicity generated by it)
Golfanatic wrote: claim from insurance
martyc5674 wrote: » Lads, Where i work finally announced that they are partaking in the BTW scheme (Raleigh to work or something?) Anyway..my commute is about 35k of motorway...but id still like to "avail" of the tax break...do you think they look in to the fact that i will unlikely ever actually cycle to work? ...Thinking of getting a new MTB for the trails :-) Marty.
z_topaz wrote: » Hey. I think I know the answer to this, but what happens if you leave your job before the year is out. Do you have to pay back the full amount of the bike (minus your previous repayments) or just the amount after your tax saving? I got a bike for over €1,000. Work paid for the first €1,000 and I'm paying them back in fortnightly installments through my wages. If I leave, do I only owe them whatever's left out of the €590 (€1,000 minus the 41% tax saving) or will I lose out on the tax benefit entirely?
Beasty wrote: » The good news is that if your new employer offers the scheme you can get a new bike there:) (ie you do not have to wait 5 years as you would have done with your old employer) - alternatively you could "top-up" with qualifying safety equipment (depending on what your new employer "offers") (eg cycle clips, or even a helmet). Of course if you do this, you then have another 5 year wait before you can use the scheme again with your new employer
mmclo wrote: » Really? I doubt that, surely it's one bike per 5 years regardless of employer? Revenue guide says... "Additionally, the exemption from income tax in respect of the benefit-in-kind can only be availed of once in any five-year period by an employee or director."
squire23 wrote: » Sorry to be an idiot but I still don't get this ... Obviously I've missed something here.