TPD wrote: » Does anybody else think that each person, when they die, should automatically have their organs put up for donation? Loads of lives would be saved. Of course, there can be an opt-out during their lifetime. It seems to me that most people aren't donors simply because they can't be bothered becoming one, rather than any opposition to the practice. This way, you're a donor unless you can be bothered to get off the list. Your opinions, AHers?
AnonoBoy wrote: » Now I like pickles but can you imagine getting the liver off one of them lads in the BGRH forum? :eek::eek::eek::eek: No thanks.
Vain wrote: » So you would rather die?:rolleyes:
Burial wrote: » No. I don't want to be forced to opt-in. Everyone who wants to let people harvest themselves when they die can do it by opting-in. I'm not letting people violate me when I die. I don't want me liver/kidney to goto a drunk because he's just going to abuse it. I want it to goto someone who deserves it. Besides if Ireland had an "opt-out" it'd mean alot more people would be "murdered" and alot more people would come here to get there liver/kidney/etc. It'd be better if the world did an opt-out, but noone will.
MagicMarker wrote: » I'm not 'officially' a donor, but i would be if i cared enough. Makes sense though, instead of carrying a card around saying ''donor'' you should have to carry one saying ''fúck off'', if that is indeed the case.
Burial wrote: » @thelordofcheese: What if I lose the card and they take my organs when I die? Will there be a database of people who don't want to give their organs away, so the public can see it? How about if I wear a necklace/bracelet/card for the rest of my life saying I'm not an organ donor? No. I don't want to be forced to leave my organs to the state and they have no right to take them from me. For all those who want to opt-in, you opt-in. I don't want my organs taken from me, by "mistake" when I die.. Also, if Ireland was the only country where everyone had to opt-out, I guarantee you, they'll be more lenient in who they give organs to. Why wouldn't an alcoholic with failed kidneys be allowed some when they have a few lying around that a bunch of dead people won't mind he takes? I wasn't talking about the current affairs of how they give out organs.
thelordofcheese wrote: » Also, you're dead, who gives two shits what happens to that slowly decaying lump of meat we used to call you? fuckkit, take 'em all, i won't need it where i'm going (which is into the ground to rot)
Burial wrote: » I don't want my organs taken from me, by "mistake" when I die..
Charco wrote: » Out of interest, why not? You won't be needing them and they could help save a life, true it might go to an alcoholic who would waste them but then it might also go to a genuine person who could live a productive life.
HammerHeadGym wrote: » I came up with a solution for this years ago. People should have 2 options; 1) I am an organ donor. When I die, the medical profession can help themselves to whatever bits of me they need. If I have an accident, I am entitled to the bank of organs that are currently in storage. 2) I am not a donor. No one is allowed to take anything from my body, before or after I die. Due to my lack of contribution to the scheme, I am not entitled to replacement organs for any reason. Same should go for blood. Why on earth people can't spare an hour, every 3 months is nothing short of self- centered indifference. If that was the law, I imagine there'd be plenty of everything to go round by the new year.
TPD wrote: » Does anybody else think that each person, when they die, should automatically have their organs put up for donation? Your opinions, AHers?
Cookie_Monster wrote: » Thats a pretty good idea actually. I think it would work. However what about those people that, for whatever reason, were unsuitable to donate? Rare genetic conditions, given dodgy blood products by the health service etc?
wrote: your slippery-slope argument is silly, it does not take into account things like suitability of the match between you an a given person as well as the suitability of you as a doner.
wrote: In a Opt-out system there would potentially be more organs availbale for those that need it, not a massive surplus of kidneys so anyone can get a replacement at a drop of a hat. Stop talking nonsense, it pains me.
wrote: Also, you're dead, who gives two ****s what happens to that slowly decaying lump of meat we used to call you? ****kit, take 'em all, i won't need it where i'm going (which is into the ground to rot)