Chochese wrote: » Why try to be a mediocre university when WIT can be a world class IT.
Fajitas! wrote: » It'd be interesting to see the potential difference in fee's between Uni & IT status colleges when they come in. It might change some peoples minds.
Sully wrote: » The management/organisation in WIT is terrible. Im not sure if its the same in all ITs/Universities but its shocking what the college gets away with at times. Iv argued that if this is how it is at an IT, imagine if it was a University - it could be a LOT worse. Others say it would improve (more money, able to hire better staff etc.) Im unsure, but this is one reason why im more against rather then for. I like the idea of a world class IT tho.
dlofnep wrote: » The parking at the moment is outrageous. It gets worse and worse every year. You literally don't have a spot unless you're in at 9am classes. They really need to rectify this. There is alot of grass that could be slabbed down. I don't care what X amount of grass is needed. I'm sure the residents would rather it slabbed down than have cars littered throughout Lismore Park. I'll definately be campaigning on it this year.
Sully wrote: » Go park elsewhere
dlofnep wrote: » But where? But around 10:30, even Lismore Park is full. There is the IDA carparks, but they are quick to clamp you. I can stick mine in the AOL carpark if I'm stuck, but not everyone is that lucky. The college is obligated to provide sufficient parking spaces. People are late for classes, often missing entire classes in search of a parking space. I actually used to come in for breakfast at 9 last year, before 10am classes just so I could get a space. And working til midnight the night before, the last thing you want is to get up out of bed an our earlier than you have to. They need to sort out something, and something lively.
BlaasForRafa wrote: » Theres a thread about something crucial to the future of Waterford and the South-East and people are talking about f**king parking???, no wonder Waterford dosen't get anywhere if thats what we're debating.
BlaasForRafa wrote: » And this business about striving to be the best IT, other than MIT name me some other famous ITs?
chickenhawk wrote: » Swiss Federal Institute of Technology ranked in top thirty in the world. Karolinska Institute of Technology top 50 Tokyo Institute of Technology top 100 etc etc
johnnyq wrote: » Just to repeat, they are actually universities!!
christophicus wrote: » I have to agree, the organisation within the college is insainly bad. I know first years that had recieved no info about college starting even up to 3 days before they were supposed to register. TBH its really a farce, I don't know if university status would change it , but atm the college does not derserve Uni status. I would like to see WIT get all of the organisational aspects in check before it can credibly be considered for university status, and yes I am a student there so I have some hands on expeariance in the college.
johnnyq wrote: » I really am amazed how administration holds such sway amongst students at WIT? Here is the list of criteria for the THES-QS World University Rankings : -Academic excellence (research, citations/faculty), -Teaching (faculty/student ratio), -Internationality (how international the faculty is, how international the student body is) -Profile of the institution with employers. Does anyone see admin listed there? I mean really, when ye decided to go to a college (wit or whatever) did ye say 'Oh Yeah I hear the admin is great there'?!?!
C'mon folks, can't ye see the benefit to Waterford and to ye're selves if WIT got proper research funding and started attracting international researchers??
The focus on timetables etc.. is really cutting off ye're nose to spite your face.
Sully wrote: » Its very stressful for students in a college that is very badly run. In fact, it would probably put people off - people wont attend a IT/University if its going to be more stressful then its worth. It has a knock on affect on each point you just made. That's just the admin side of things, I could call into question other points also such as teaching quality and facilities. Possibly, but the point being made is: If WIT was upgrade as badly run as it is now, would it be far worse and turn more people away? Should it be upgraded if its not going to make the problem go away? Timetables isn't really the problem, but now that you say it - no timetables, means no lectures, means no lecturer, means no academic excellence. But thats on a large scale. For most, it only takes like 4/5 weeks before it gets sorted. After that, its only the odd problem if any. But, thats just one minor issue.
johnnyq wrote: » How badly is WIT run? Rat Infested? No electricity? Every room is double booked? Is it really that 'stressful'?
All of what I've read on this thread would be solved by an increase in funding that uni status would bring. If anything, maintaining IT status will make the problems you elude to even worse because of budget cutbacks.
johnnyq wrote: » Assigning one administrator to look after each problem you listed there would cost c.30000*10 = 300,000 a year. That's it. 300,000 vs millions for WIT and the local economy. University = More Funding. End of.
How will more funding make the problems you listed worse? How do you expect the problems you listed to be solved, when you want to restrict WIT getting more funding? It baffles me
Your preference atm is Waterford IT = Tralee IT over silly technicalities.
johnnyq wrote: » Assigning one administrator to look after each problem you listed there would cost c.30000*10 = 300,000 a year. That's it. 300,000 vs millions for WIT and the local economy. University = More Funding. End of. How will more funding make the problems you listed worse? How do you expect the problems you listed to be solved, when you want to restrict WIT getting more funding? It baffles me? Your preference atm is Waterford IT = Tralee IT over silly technicalities.
Sir Baralot wrote: » I am currently in UL and I'm here because my course wasn't offered in WIT. The amount of money that my parents are paying weekly to keep me up here is pretty ridiculous to say the least. Coming from a financial point of view and nothing else, I do believe that WIT should be aiming for University status because I think it's unfair that there is a University located in every part of the country with the exception of the South-East. We are the only people that are forced to spend a lot of money to go to University and that, I think, is definately most unfair.
Decision expected on Waterford’s long-running bid for university status By Conor Kane WATERFORD Institute of Technology’s application for university status is likely to be decided upon by the Government in the coming weeks. But Education Minister Batt O’Keeffe has warned the application raised “significant issues” regarding third-level policy and the roles played by universities and institutes of technology. The matter was raised in the Dáil by Labour party TD Brian O’Shea. He asked for an update on Waterford’s long-running bid to be re-designated as the University of the South-East.