Mairt wrote: » I just want to go right off topic and say that Twink is a gee-bag. She's fvcking rotten.
Kintarō Hattori wrote: » What the hell does it matter if she's not as stunning as some brazilian supermodel. How does it affect you, more importantly why even care?
Deleted User wrote: » Ah Mairty....with a few pints it would be done lad
Kintarō Hattori wrote: » I'm sure it's been said already but everyone has their off days. What the hell does it matter if she's not as stunning as some brazilian supermodel. How does it affect you, more importantly why even care?
Joe Cool wrote: » Zip up your mickey!
Kold wrote: » Little to none of what is discussed in AH matters. Most of us are just astonished that someone who is paid a lot of money just to be beautiful is actually not very attractive at all. This is the discussion here, if you want to start a thread on why anyone posts anything in AH, go ahead.
Dudess wrote: » That's the case with lots of models though - make-up and airbrushing do wonders. I don't think it's necessary to be naturally beautiful at all to be a model, other attributes are more important. I definitely think Glenda Gilson's got what it takes to be a model. I don't think she's particularly beautiful though.
ronbyrne2005 wrote: » What does the omnipresent Dudess look like though? Pics please.
An Fhile wrote: » ^ Agreed! Also, that link in post #140 upset me. Those faces didn't remind me of men. Like, at all.
sheroo_05 wrote: » she'l do for a poke if the telly s broke
Dudess wrote: » IMO you couldn't get a better bod than that. And if you could, it still doesn't take away from the fact that she is in fantastic shape.
Plug wrote: » Every hole's a goal!
Mairt wrote: » As I said earlier, most girls could have that with some exercise and dietry discipline.