nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

5 Bears vs 10 Lions

Kold

Haven't had one of these threads in a while.

The bears are fully grown grizzlies.

I reckon the bears because a bear could shrug off a few blows, whereas one blow on a lion and that lion isn't getting up imo. Gotten quite divided views on this one so far though.

Find more posts tagged with

bears ftw

Quick Links

Comments

Ass

Needs to be a checkbox poll.

2 lions to each grizzly..take him from behind(I won't be saying that again in a hurry)

win for the lions tbh.

Magpie!

Bears don't really deliver blows tho, they grab on and maul. Whereas lions go for the throat or back or the neck and work in packs. The fact that there are twice as many lions - I'd put my house on the kittehs.

And i can't believe I'm replying to such a lame thread. Time for bed I think.

Overheal

Lions are powerful and fast. However Bears make up for it with raw power and tenacity. And, they are cuddlier.

AARRRGH

I think it would be the lions.

I've seen one tiger attack a crocodile and it was ruthless!

[Deleted User]

The bears would make short work of a few mountain lions.

PrivateEye

the bears would eat them all for breakfast and then go off.....for breakfast.

http://www.library.ucsb.edu/libwaves/apr02/bears.jpg
Bears are clearly more intelligent.

Magpie!

AARRRGH wrote: »

I think it would be the lions.

I've seen one tiger attack a crocodile and it was ruthless!

On Discovery or for real?

N.O.I.P.

Mountain Lions are tiny compared to a Grizzly,

Bears FTW!!

chopperbyrne

The lions don't stand a chance in this one.

Kold

How many lions is it gonna take to make a close fight so?

/rings the zoo: MOAR LIONZ!

Overheal

Nobody specified the type of lion. African Lions or NorthWestern Mountain Lions (aka. Cougar/Puma/Panther)?

BrokenArrows

Atari jaguar!

trout

My money is on the bears, so long as they are proper Grizzly bears, with hairy ar$es and bad attitudes.

If you are talking about them Kung Fu Panda types ... Lions ftw.

smellslikeshoes

Think the Lions would definitely come off best since they are a pack animal and would probably work together. Would probably end up in a situation where the Lions take down a few bears then make a coordinated retreat to safety.

pwd

they have opposite mentalities.
a lion is more likely to attack you if you run away
a bear is more likely to attack you if you hold your ground or approach it
according to the stories I've read anyway.

several hundred thousand jaguars would easily win due to their overwhelming numerical advantage.

Seachmall

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLwmUbRY8Mk

I think tigers are bigger then lions but I'm not sure so bears ftw

Mimikyu

This post has been deleted.

Overheal

Its been settled:

The Californians of the late 19th century staged well-documented pit fights with grizzlies and spanish bulls. The grizzlies, using their paw as a club, shattered the unfortunate bull’s skull or shoulder bones so easily that the betting became poor.

Eventually, and at considerable cost, African lions were brought in to raise the stakes. The most fierce of the adult males was sent in whilst the grizzly was already waiting in the pits. The lion was known for bravely charging straight in and looked good for the money, but the grizzly killed a male lion almost as easily as he’d killed the bull.

http://www.lairweb.org.nz/tiger/conflict13.html

also http://www.greatgodpan.com/2004/05/bears_versus_bullsa_california.htm

lions are good for speed but their strength and stamina are not up to scratch.

Victor

Lions or Mountain Lions?

Creature

Grizzly bears are ****ing enormous. The lions wouldn't stand a chance.

FunkZ

The lions and it would be done and dusted quite quickly as well.

dlofnep

The title is misleading. Mountain lions are not lions. Cougar is the correct name for them. 10 real lions would savage 5 grizzlys. 1 lion would savage 1 grizzly. 10 cougars would beat 5 grizzlies IMO.

http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=h7MuFDVEUro

Seachmall

dlofnep wrote: »

The title is misleading. Mountain lions are not lions. Cougar is the correct name for them. 10 real lions would savage 5 grizzlys. 1 lion would savage 1 grizzly. 10 cougars would beat 5 grizzlies IMO.

http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=h7MuFDVEUro

The thing is if the bear was willing to fight one or two smacks could have crushed the cougars skull (as sourced above).

Frisbee

Bears ftw!

FunkZ

I just got in trouble for showing my six year old nephew a lioness fight a zebra. Thanks thread.

The_Minister

Lions can kill elephants.

If anyone is really interested I can dig up a link to a video of about six lions going to town on an elephant (they fail, but they got a baby one).

gabigeist

This is ridiculous. Everyone knows that King Kong resembled a bear on his hind legs and he destroyed a city. If you scale it down, a miniature King Kong (bear) would throttle a miniature city (village). 5 bears could probably even handle a small town. Have you seen how much dynamite it takes to blow up a small town in the old WWII movies? That much dynamite would defo kill 10 lions so 5 bears are clearly the winner.

Seachmall

gabigeist wrote: »

This is ridiculous. Everyone knows that King Kong resembled a bear on his hind legs and he destroyed a city. If you scale it down, a miniature King Kong (bear) would throttle a miniature city (village). 5 bears could probably even handle a small town. Have you seen how much dynamite it takes to blow up a small town in the old WWII movies? That much dynamite would defo kill 10 lions so 5 bears are clearly the winner.

Its like logic we've never seen before!!

I tip my hat to you sir.

entropi

I would bet on the Bears myself.