pointofnoreturn wrote: » Just want to say a note about the discussion here; the reason their is so much negative feedback is people are not thinking solutions! you just talking about the problems we face, We can do with thinking solutions! and not getting bothered about the problems, their is an answer for everything
Victor wrote: » That sounds like something from Fairyland. It is for the proponent of something to back it up. Give me the solutions that you have. Bus or bike?
JustMary wrote: » What absolute rubbish: the world is littered with "solutions" that people spent money on, but which failed because people didn't understand the problem that their "solution" was supposed to solve. The glass needs to be made neither half-empty nor half-full, but just the right size. To do that, we need to understand what that size needs to be!
Victor But they are building a motorway to Tuam.
Victor wrote: » But they are building a motorway to Tuam.
pointofnoreturn wrote: » If you look at the history of London underground, it's existence actually motivated development, people would start to build near to various stations as they new they could live km's from the centre and live outside the city with out the need of a car. Ok it's London but this is like 80 to a 100's ago, but in general, this could be planned right and in turn really benefit the city and county
Deleted User wrote: » Also the rail line towards Connemara doesn't go anywhere useful. It turns north and goes through the bogs to Clifden rather than following the coast going by Salthill, Bearna, An Spidéal etc. It would also involve building a big bridge and making the tunnel under Prospect Hill useable again.
pointofnoreturn wrote: » We are looking towards more inside the city and city subards, build a bridge to support light rail wouldn't cost that much seeing that foundations are their. Also the station is moving out towards Renmore [don't know why!] so the old existing station can also serve as the hub for various trams and light rail, all in all it means knocking buildings in the centre etc.. but like allot of a builds in galway could be knocked for estectic reasons, Of course we have lots of challenges and problems to over come, but it could really build Galway as a strong sustainable European class city, and in this economic downturn we need to think sustainability in any aspect. Their is allot of motivation and if it makes enough noise the media will hit it, as long as their is good research and really examples in europe, [which their is, allot of!] it could make a big enought impact to make vivaible sence to happen in a 10 year window.
GerardKeating wrote: » There was an article a month or so ago in the Advertiser that two routes very origionall considered for this line, the eventual route, and a coastal alternative. via Bearna, An Spidéal, Indreabhán, Baile na hAbhann, Castla and then towards Maam Cross Cliften. This would have made a more viable line.
Deleted User ...CIE have big plans for the area vacated, including building over the entrance to the tunnel at the station (if you go to the end of the platform you can see it on the other side of the turntable, there is a lot of interesting industrial architecture around there) cie.ie 36 page .pdf Galway is a European city, just a significantly wetter one. I personally believe that building up a proper bus system is the place to start. It is simple, scaleable and uses existing infrastructure. I don't think most people realise how cheap a monthly ticket can be. There is a lot that can be done to expand and improve the service. Talk about knocking buildings shows how unrealistic this is and any bridge which is going to carry more than pedestrians will cost a lot of money.
Deleted User wrote: » I personally believe that building up a proper bus system is the place to start. It is simple, scaleable and uses existing infrastructure. I don't think most people realise how cheap a monthly ticket can be.