Rb wrote: » I'm on my 2nd provisional and am a better driver than the majority of idiots I encounter on the roads, yet I'm quite happy to see the laws on this be tightened up. There's far too many 17-21 year olds going around on their first provisional in the cars by themselves, or with their mates distracting them, trying to show off etc. I'll be glad to see them being pulled up on it.
menoscemo wrote: » People should not be taking advice on driving from someone who hasn't passed his/her test.
keen wrote: » Same here, I have a feeling it's all talk. They say the reason that things like this aren't enforced all the time is due to lack of resources, so how do they magic extra resources for six days?
Abigayle wrote: » I've seen FL drivers fuck up majorly on roads. They seem to be allergic to their own indicator controls also. Should one take advice off them? Why dont we take out a massive brush and big can of tar and slather it all over the L-drivers here? Theres a desperate case of FL snobbery going on here, its pretty sad actually. And, it certainly doesnt help those with on-coming tests. FL's you were once L-Drivers yourselves. Both can be shit drivers, no matter what the fuck your licence says.
eolhc wrote: » also heard L driver arn't insured for motorway driving? is that 100% true.
menoscemo wrote: » This country is plagued with bad driving, getting L-divers off the road is only one part of the problem but it is a start and something that is badly needed.
menoscemo wrote: » Next time going on a motorway, have a look at the sign as you enter. No LDrivers No Bicycles No Tractors Etc Etc
greenfly wrote: » Just wondering what ye all thought about this.
eolhc wrote: » i know what the sign says, and i'm long past being an L driver, i'm just curious to know are you basically driving uninsured by being an L driver on a motorway
irlmarc wrote: » I mean look at the UK where some of the cars in urban centers have equipment that will scann passing cars licence plates and warn of no tax and insurance and can check these details. There are no such systems here all someone has to say is its in the post and its all gravy!
menoscemo wrote: » I guess so. Technically they are uninsured if not accompaied too...
Deleted User wrote: » Good! I hope the stop the dipstick ("L" plate no passinger) I got stuck behind on the M50 today, he was doing 70kmh in the middle lane, forcing traffic to go either side of him and refusing to go into lane one. :mad: It's time learners only used the roads for learning (while under instruction) and not driving here there & everywhere until they pass the test!
token56 wrote: » With regards the learner drivers thing. The thing that really pi**es me off is that the accompaning driver must have their full license for over 2 years. Now they are telling us that not all ful license holders are equal, this part of the law is ridiculous. In saying this I can't see them been very strict on this part. At least I hope not.
Capt'n Midnight wrote: » Oh FFS quite whinging It's 3 years up north and then after you pass your test you'd have to display R plates and avoid motorways and if you get a couple of pealty points, say for travelling at 55mph you loose your R status and be an L driver again. People up there are Irish too , now that we've gote better roads only difference is the better enforcement and driver testing.
JP Liz wrote: » I agree that alot of young people drive wreckless and cause accidents but what about the oldies they are just as bad Would it be better if the age for driving was raised to maybe 21??????
JP Liz wrote: » How many Learner Permit and Provisional Licence holders are currently in the Republic of Ireland???????? I agree that alot of young people drive wreckless and cause accidents but what about the oldies they are just as bad Would it be better if the age for driving was raised to maybe 21??????
taidghbaby wrote: » eh i was behind an 80 year old woman coming onto the m50 the other day .......