chem wrote: » If the panel ment to represent us are not asking these questions then what the hell is the point of them been there? Are they going cap in hand and saying thank you govenor to any bone they get trown?
7. RELOADING: Following advice from the Attorney General, the DOJ had decided to pause for thought on the advisability of allowing the reloading of ammunition in private homes by citizens. The Department has issued a discussion document on the subject setting out the pros and cons from it’s point of view and has invited submissions from the shooting interests.
Re-loading The associations are very concerned with an apparent rowing back on the legislation to allow for the re-loading of ammunition. This is a very common practise in a great many European countries and while the associations note the reported advice of the AG in relation to this matter, they are not at all convinced that the advice bears close scrutiny. This view is held based on what is common practice in a large number of European countries, noticeably without the “consequences” which seem to concern the AG.
Sparks wrote: » Are we still using mercury fulminate in primers? I thought they'd switched away from that stuff decades ago.
Gunter Mauser wrote: » Grizzly, you must be talking Biffo country for this type of target shooting if it ever takes place! or the wilds of Donegal.:rolleyes:
Gunter Mauser wrote: » If we are adopting the Canadian model for range layout here, lets have the rest of what the Canadian target shooter gets for his dollar namely the same type of abality to reload why not! They can shoot 50 cal barrets the range regulations distances behind the backstop must account for this type of target shooting, we don't here have 50 cal ranges and most lightly never will, does the canadian model:p fit into the same templet we have taken on so that we have clearances behind the backstop that takes into account this type of firearm a firearm that will never see use?
Gunter Mauser wrote: » rrpc, from previous posting I understood they could use 50 cal in Canada. If what you are saying they dont permit this caliber then I stand corrected, sorry folks for the dodgie info! Is this caliber available over in the UK as a matter of interest.
Grizzly 45 wrote: » Well Sikamick YOU tell us what there is to be optimistic about??? The deer hunting course is a prime example of private Irish organisations at work.And if you are not a member of a club???Glib answer is no doubt join one.But sorry some of us are not club animals or are within a convient distance.I do not consider a 120 mile round trip to the nearest one to me as convient. Sorry if I sound negative but the general activity of those in charge of shooting is on one side; the Govt...Ban or restrict as much as possible,waste as much time and taxpayers money to obstruct,hinder,obfusticate,and vexate the Irish shooting industry individual and collective as much as possible.In other words make it expensive for them shooting lot The shooter side.Negoiate as much as possible, get what we can[No problem there]but get everyone piegon holed and stashed away in clubs where they can be fleeced [I personally think] for as much as possible,on every little bit of dirt, and kept an eye on for any slight deviation from normality. What is wrong with simply making this reloading issue like this? Read up a US NRA course.Sign off on it when getting the liscense.If this is good enough for firearms it is good enough for reloading. Why do we have to go thru the expense of sitting in a classroom for afour week period to learn this which is a simple procedure,while being milked by a club again?? I am getting tired by being fleeced by both sides..Negative ..cynical more like.But thats just a nasty of telling the truth.
Grizzly 45 wrote: » Glad to hear it that yourclub bank acc is so healthy.:) No I am not Sikamick,as I said there isnt one within a 120 mile round trip.So whatever I pay there in doing the course I lose in travel time and fuel costs.Now are we talking a day course...no problem then as this could be taught within 12 hours...But a course stretched to ridicilous lengths of six weekends or somthing like that.[Which I belive anyone who could ,would to make some more money for themselves or club] would be not on.Positive...Well I just feel that being cynical/pessimistic about things shooting related is somtimes the safer bet.As you are then never surprised or dissapointed.:rolleyes:
Grizzly 45 wrote: » Well Sikamick, That is the most sensible idea I've heard in awhile.:). If we can convince DOJ that the US NRA qualification is good enough.:(. _________________________________________________________________ Grizzly I am not proposing that the US NRA reloading correspondence course on its own be accepted, I said that it would be a very good starting point for people to study and then to bring a qualified Reloading instructor to ones club to run a hands on course. I have seen reloading be done in the UK and in the North of Ireland by qualified people and it is not a simple procedure; you do have to have practical experience to do it safely. Also it is time consuming and requires a person with patience. Re the worry by the powers that be that every shooter in the country is going to take up reloading is unfounded. It more than likely that only SOME targets shooters/hunters will do it. I wonder what the statistics are in the USA for shooters/hunters that reload as against the total number of known shooters /hunters in the country. I think in the over all count reloaders will be marginal.