kittensoft1984 wrote: » If a woman says no they mean no.
Mordeth wrote: » how do you dress inappropriately?
Overheal wrote: » when youre 15 years old and your whole back; and stomach; and legs are showing. Basically when you decide you only need to cover 33% of your body.
Karl Hungus wrote: » Quite honestly, anyone who believes it's the woman's fault is an idiot.
kittensoft1984 wrote: » how can anyone honestly say that it is the victims fault?
Almost 33% of those surveyed thought a victim was in some way responsible for being raped if she flirted with a man or failed to say 'no' clearly. 10% of people felt the victim was entirely at fault if she had a number of sexual partners.One in three believed a woman was either partly or fully to blame if she wore revealing clothes. Nearly one in four people felt that a woman must share some of the blame if she walked through a deserted area. 25% believed a woman who was drunk and took illegal drugs was either partly or fully to blame. The survey also found that adults under the age of 25 were far more likely to blame a raped woman than people aged 25 to 44.
WindSock wrote: » They should take a leaf out of Afghanistans books and cover up completely. I bet no one gets raped there.
Overheal wrote: » When my cousin was 17 she thought it would be an awesome idea to go out to clubs and get drunk. Before long you make your friends, bla bla bla.... Then she went to a house party after a few weeks and her drink was spiked. Whatever substance they gave her didnt knock her out - it paralised her. And she was gang-raped. she witnessed felt and heard the entire thing. Yes, I think she had some say in how stupid she was.
kittensoft1984 wrote: » yes it was foolish but her drink was spiked....she wasnt to blame.