Dinter wrote: » Well certainly hard enough to cause a fight where their contribution will be a kick when the other person's already on the ground. That's my experience anyway. .
Bod1 wrote: » Anyone says any different and I'll have them !!!
Ikky Poo2 wrote: » Good Christ, we've only just finished with the insecure woman thread and now it's mini-man day. What the **** is it with people this week? Can yous not just get over yourselves and stop ****ign compensating?!
Bod1 wrote: » I, as a 5' 5" bloke can tell you that there is no disadvantage to being smaller than the the "average", I mean who want's to be average ?, we go like the clappers in the sack, so women generally love us, (think terrier here), can get in through toilet windows when girls are locked out, then reap the rewards, tall women love smaller blokes, I know, I've been there !! and small blokes only get small bloke syndrome when they see lanky tw@ts trying to dance, it's scientifically proven smaller men dance better that tall streaks. Anyone says any different and I'll have them !!!
mike65 wrote: » Pats Bod1 on head. Mike.
Bod1 wrote: » Here's a question ? I've seen it said in the past that women don't like going out with men smaller than them ? BUT What about Gay men ? do the same biases apply. I'm just being bias curious here !!!
Pighead wrote: » Fair enough Bod, you've outlined some good points there and you've made being a small man seem not quite as bad as Pighead originally thought. But c'mon buddy surely the disadvantages far outweigh the positives. What about if you're in a shop and you have a boner. Porn mags are on the top shelf, the farmers journal is on the bottom. Being small, you're forced to go home and relieve yourself to a picture of Bessy the prize winning Carlow friesian. Surely in instances like this you yearn for those extra inches?
Pighead wrote: » Pretty sure women don't like going out with gay men either. Something to do with the whole, not finding them attractive business. But whats that got to do with you're short arse and stumpy legs?
Pighead wrote: » Hmm smells like a little un to Pighead. Lots of anger in this wee fella.
Bod1 wrote: » Is this a response to my gay man post.
Bod1 wrote: » Didn't you know it was a small bloke that invented internet porn to avoid such dilemma !!??!
mike65 wrote: » As if. I was merely patronising the status of your challanged stature. Mike.
Pighead wrote: » What about if you're in a shop and you have a boner. Porn mags are on the top shelf, the farmers journal is on the bottom.
Bod1 wrote: » Your assuming I'm a dwarf, maybe I'm a midget ?
Dinter wrote: » What's the average height for an Irish man?
Pighead wrote: » Ok fair enough that solves the porn mag dilemma but what about this one. Imagine you lived in Sierra Leone, a country where small men find it extremely difficult to find a women to settle down with. Sierra Leoneon women look down on short men and go for tall men who they feel will protect them from fear and evil. Now you'll probably say that you have no intention of ever going to Sierra Leone but in fairness these things choose us, we do not choose them.
Pighead wrote: » PIgheads assuming nothing. How could he when he has never seen your tiny little face. Everybody knows that the only difference between a dwarf and a midget is that a dwarf is ugly. Having never met you Pighead is not in a position to label you with either of these names. For now Pighead will stick with littlemanshortypants.
Dinter wrote: » I would say he's a midget because if he was a dwarf he'd type like this: ghwekll;op luio awe This would be caused by his stubby fingers, which would not have the dexterity or delicacy to type accurately.
Bod1 wrote: » D'ja wanna take this outside ?