randylonghorn wrote: » 12 might not have been considered way out of line when people were usually dead by 35 / 40, when life was a hell of a lot harsher, and kids had to grow up a lot more quickly. Even at that, I think most societies would have considered 12 somewhat young ... Certainly, nowadays, it is very young, even allowing that some kids mature far faster than others (I mean mentally / emotionally, rather than physically). That said, I would see a big difference between, say, a man of 20 with all his mental faculties having sex with a 12 or 13 year old, and two kids of that age "experimenting" with one another. I wouldn't be thrilled about either scenario, but I would argue that they are very different issues.
lolipops wrote: » im 15 and still a virgin.. i want to wait for the right person, i dont think im emotionally mature enough to do it yet. id like to wait until im 17 or so. :rolleyes:
Kold wrote: » Pics of hymen or you're a 40 yr old slut.
lolipops wrote: » erm i dont need to prove myself to you lol and why they hell would someone take pictures of their hymen and send them to some potential child mincing pedofile who is 40 and lives with their mom. well hmmmmmmmm?
Zee Deveel wrote: » my (now) boyfriend lost his at 13 to a girl of similar age and that was no big deal at all to either involved.
randylonghorn wrote: » Jeez, I can see why! I was going to say "little bitch" but then again I suppose she was very young too ...