Mahatma coat wrote: » Hmm, who'd a thunk the exhausts of airplanes give off toxic chemicals :rolleyes: until someone can provide me with something reasonably plausible as to WHY, I'm gonna list this one with the Lizzardmen, whoa, thats who's flyin the planes. BUT SERIOUSLY FLOKS if there is even a hint of truth to this I weep for humanity
Another bacterium, Bacillus globigii, never shown to be harmful to people, was released in San Francisco, while still others were tested on unwitting residents in New York, Washington, D.C., and along the Pennsylvania Turnpike, among other places, according to Army reports released during the 1977 hearings. In New York, military researchers in 1966 spread Bacillus subtilis variant Niger, also believed to be harmless, in the subway system by dropping lightbulbs filled with the bacteria onto tracks in stations in midtown Manhattan. The bacteria were carried for miles throughout the subway system, leading Army officials to conclude in a January 1968 report: "Similar covert attacks with a pathogenic [disease-causing] agent during peak traffic periods could be expected to expose large numbers of people to infection and subsequent illness or death."
meglome wrote: » Seriously I should be in bed and I'm reading this ****e. This is not the place for talking sense. I give up.
Kernel wrote: » If you made a point perhaps someone could respond to it?
rc28 wrote: » Sorry but this is a really pathetic conspiracy theory.http://amos.indiana.edu/library/scripts/contrails.html
This "rescue" effort of neutralizing and transmuting the toxic elements in chemtrails was initiated in early 2002 with the introduction of a device called the "chembuster" which will transmute the atmospheric orgone energy envelope from one polarity ('DOR') which allow chemtrails to persist, to another orgone polarity ('OR') which will cause chemtrails to disperse. The proliferation of chembusters around the country led to another dramatic development in early 2004: legions of huge air elemental beings called "Sylphs" by ancient Greeks made their presence known by assuming cloud shapes that often look like wispy winged angels or animal forms (there are dozens of photos of Sylphs posted on the Sylph /Chemtrail page) who set about "cleaning up" the skies of chemtrail toxins by engulfing and transmuting chemtrail toxins into non-toxic substances.
humanji wrote: » What if we use our six senses and realize that it's still a load of rubbish? "The camel will fly south for Winter, but the emu took a boat"
humanji wrote: » If nothing is being sprayed in the sky, they won't know what the hell you're talking about and just dismiss you. But you would take such a response as an admission of guilt. The way you seem to take this is like if I asked were you a lizardman (sorry to keep bringing them up, but they've won a special place in my heart now ). You'd answer one of 3 main ways: 1) You'd admit it (whether you're joking or really are one), in which case I'd be happy that I'm right. 2) You'd deny it, in which case I'd say "Of course you'd deny it, that means you must be a lizardman" 3) You'd dismiss me as an idiot, to which I'd take it as a victory for me since you must be avoiding the question because you are a lizardman.
casey212 wrote: » If people cannot use their own six senses to independently consider the situation, then what can I say, you are among the living dead.
humanji wrote: » What? Do you honestly belive that dismissing something is proof of guilt? And what the hell has Admiralty law have to do with the sky? Are you just trolling now?
casey212 wrote: » Ring the department of defence, ask them what is being sprayed in the sky. They will not deny anything, merely refuse to answer. The reason for this is legalistic.
casey212 wrote: » Admiralty law is the law of commerce.
bonkey wrote: » OK...I'll bite. What's your sixth sense? I would also point out that one cannot prove a negative. Its an argument you used on a Green Issues thread, so there's no question but that you understand its usage. Thus, no-one can prove that chemtrails aren't real....just like they can't prove the invisible pink unicorn at the bottom of my garden isn't real. The correct behaviour is to treat chemtrails like the invisible pink unicorn and ask for evidence if its existence which can be meaningfully scrutinised. Keeping an open mind on the subject means allowing that evidence may indicate its existence. It does not mean believing in it until evidence says otherwise. If you disagree, I've a lovely pet invisible pink unicorn to sell you. Would you care to summarise what this evidence is?
bonkey wrote: » No, thats commercial law. Admiralty law is effectively the same as maritime law, which is somewhat different to the Law of teh Sea.
casey212 wrote: » Admiralty law is the only law available nowadays.
humanji wrote: » No, commercial law and admiralty law are two very different things.
