Rob_l wrote: » Your all right we dont need a national station do away with it we can rely on TV3 for our news and current affairs programming and the national language station sure thats useless.
cson wrote: » TV3 does alright considering it doesn't get subsidised €160.
whitetrash wrote: » You really think you can rely on RTE for your news and current affairs? You don't think state-sponsored news might be a little biased?
ScumLord wrote: » I want to keep RTE some of it's shows are ok, we have good current affairs programs. My problem with RTE is they don't make an effort there doesn't seem to be any flare in the company. They're just trying to copy tv stations from oversees and they can't go toe to toe with these guys they just don't have the funds. They should be trying something new instead of pulling up the same faces to do the same shows.
Timothy Bryce wrote: » You should go to court and argue that only want to pay part of the license fee for the parts of the programming that you deem to quality and acceptable viewing! Most TV networks rip each off in one way or another. TV3 are notorious for that sort of **** but RTE *do* put together some original programming not fleeced off other networks. It's €160 lids FFS - just pay it like everyone else!
MOH wrote: » Not at all. And sure they have no influence whatsoever on who gos on discussion panels.
ScumLord wrote: » It's not really allot of money in the grand scheme of things. If there's 2 million licence's that's only €4mill, which to a large corporation isn't exactly a huge amount of money. especially when a quarter of that goes straight into feeding Gerry Ryan.
Galwayguy99 wrote: » Umm, not sure where you learned maths, but 2 million licences x €160 = €320 million. And that I would call a large amount of money!
TPD wrote: » Do you have to pay a tv licence if you have a computer with a tv-in card? Like if you moved into a house which already had an arial and all that, and didnt actually use a tv?
Kipperhell wrote: » I never understand why people are so aggressive about not paying their licence. Relatively small amount in the scheme of things. I think it is really pathetic when somebody has a huge TV in their house that costs a couple of thousand and then go mental at the mention of paying a tv licence. I am also pretty sure every benefits from the fee as they use it to regulate transmissions such as ambulance frequencies too. Not sure though but it doesn't all go straight to RTE for sure.
ScumLord wrote: » No. Send your tv bitch I'll smack the face o' im. Half RTEs homemade garbage is just repeats. HANDS!! FFS! it's as old as the hills, It's actually very watchable when your stoned but still.. Hands prime time RTE viewing.
aidan_walsh wrote: » No, instead it gets money and a vast majority of its programming from parent company ITV.
Timothy Bryce wrote: » Maybe your VCR is
I won't be sending 'my tv bitch for you to smack'
ScumLord wrote: » VCR? RTE do show a hole heap of programing from early days of colour. One show was them taking a load of guinness down a canal, it was made in the 70-80s and was pure and utter ****e. Maybe it was just a summer thing? Spoilsport.