monkeyfudge wrote: » You possibly have some deep rooted breast related issues...
Dudess wrote: But a nice pair of 18-year-old tits on page 3 is ok?
Senna wrote: » the question is OP, if she was just walking along with her tits out and she didn't have a kid hanging off them, would you still be disgusted?
The-Rigger wrote: » No, it's not ok, it's great. Not if she was attractive. Hot chicks should be permitted to breastfeed in public. I would be willing to be part of the 'Breastfeeding Police' to ensure that only attractive women were breastfeeding in public.
Dudess wrote: » No matter how hot the woman is, if her nipple has a baby's mouth around it and her breasts aren't at their perkiest (which is generally the case after pregnancy) it will disgust some people - females included.
Steyr wrote: » So i was in Dublin last weekend ...
The-Rigger wrote: » what is this obsession with having babies anyhow? It's not natural.
baraca wrote: » are you on any other forums under the name dagnut no?
Dudess wrote: » breastfeeding is perfectly natural, why should it only be done in private? And if the baby needs a feed, the baby needs a feed. Why should the mother have to go to the trouble of finding a private spot in this situation?
Senna wrote: » its natural to take a dump, but i dont do it in the street.
The-Rigger wrote: » I am not.
orestes wrote: » Maybe if you bought real books instead of the tripe they sell in Easons you would have a more open mind. I recommend Waterstones, but I did see someone pick their nose there once so it might not be to your liking.
orestes wrote: » Maybe if you bought real books instead of the tripe they sell in Easons you would have a more open mind. .
Baraca wrote: ok. just curious
Dudess wrote: » True, but faecal matter on the street is littering, which is something that breast-feeding doesn't lead to - unless she gives her nipple a wipe afterwards and drops the tissue/wipe on the ground.
The-Rigger wrote: » ....How come? Actually I've heard that it's legal to sh1t in public because in the eyes of the law it is something you don't have control over, and if a policeman stumbles upon you, he is required to give you his hat (to sh1t in). Now it sounds highly implausible to me too, but the person who told me was insistent that this law (albeit, old law) exists.
The-Rigger wrote: » ....How come?
baraca wrote: » A guy on another forum i use has pretty much the same sense of humour as you, And your sig pic is his avatar. So i said id put 2 and 2 together. Then again i was never any good at maths.
HAPPYGIRL wrote: » That old law exists in England, it has never existed here.
The-Rigger wrote: » Actually I've heard that it's legal to sh1t in public because in the eyes of the law it is something you don't have control over,
monkeyfudge wrote: » Eh... you do realise that it's entirely possible to choose when you go for a sh*t? The OP probably wasn't breast fed as a child, but others don't appear to have been toilet trained.
The-Rigger wrote: because in the eyes of the law it is something you don't have control over