T-Boner wrote: I think its one thing for a scumbag to see a garda checkpoint down on Sheriff St. but an altogether different thing to see a strong army patrol walk through the area.
Mordeth wrote: isn't that called martial law?
Mairt wrote: I don't think so as the army would only act as a back up to the guards and not administer law and punishment. I don't remember the army being deployed on the streets of Limerick like one poster said. But I do remember them being deployed during the Don Tidy kidnapping and the hunt for 'Dessie (The border fox) O'Hare' and no one said it was 'martial law'. Our Defence Forces have extensive knowledge of policing hostile area's oversea's so its probably not a bad idea considering using that knowledge as a short term stop gap here. The army has also worked along side the garda in Sarajevo & Kosovo successfully. Probably not a bad idea, however I can't see a government in liberal (weak as fvck) Ireland giving the nod to this idea.
Training is carried out on gas and oil rigs off Ireland's Atlantic coast, in remote rural areas and in the urban environment.
cornbb wrote: Christ, the idea of using the army to police a modern European democracy is insane. We're not some unstable central European newborn democracy. At least we're not supposed to be. Someone on the radio this morning suggested introducing internment to tackle crime :eek:
Gabrielle Faithful Chemist wrote: United Kingdom? It deployed soldiers in Northern Ireland for decades and also introduced internment there.
DesF wrote: The country is becoming a joke. It was alright when it was scummers killing each other off, but when innocent bystanders began to be killed too, then it was obvious that the government needed to give the Gardaí stronger powers. .
Bambi wrote: but i told yiz where this would end
DaveMcG wrote: And that worked a treat.
Bambi wrote: Also, we need to hold the army in reserve just in case the binmen go on strike again
Mairt wrote: Well that has to be the most ill thought out post ever, in the entire 'Web universe.
Gabrielle Faithful Chemist wrote: I don't think so. It's a pure statement of fact. The British government did deploy soldiers to aid policing within it's own borders (Northern Ireland).http://www.guardian.co.uk/Northern_Ireland/Story/0,,2138431,00.html Internment was introduced as well.http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/august/9/newsid_4071000/4071849.stm Fact, not opinion.
cornbb wrote: But we're getting off topic now. The point is, the principle of armed forces is to defend a country from foreign powers. Using them as a police force should be a very last resort, when total meltdown is inevitable. They are not trained as a police force. The government offering the use of the army is a ludicrous, lazy and drastic PR stunt, they need to get their thumbs out and strengthen the gardai and judiciary.
Mairt wrote: An army is also there to defend the country from domestic threats too. As for total meltdown. At what stage do you think it we should consider the use of military force to defend citizens against gangland crime?. It seem's to me that gangster's can murder at will now, and god forbid the innocent who might get in the way. Is the money carried in securicor van's more valuable than human life?. Raids on securicor van's are hardly, or were never, at ''melt down''.
Mairt wrote: Is the money carried in securicor van's more valuable than human life?. Raids on securicor van's are hardly, or were never, at ''melt down''.
Senior Garda officers have dismissed the suggestion that the Army should be drafted in to help tackle gangland crime. Officers were baffled as to why Justice Minister Brian Lenihan did not rule out the idea when it was mooted in the Dail by Fine Gael justice spokesman Charles Flanagan. Mr Lenihan said he would pass on the suggestion to Garda Commissioner Noel Conroy. Gardai last night regarded his failure firmly to reject it as an embarrassing gaffe. Mr Flanagan later indicated he believed that military intelligence could have a role to play in the gangland fight. But this was also rejected by gardai, who pointed out that the military's only involvement in gathering intelligence was against suspected associates of international terrorism groups, such as those with links to al-Qa'ida.High-ranking Army sources also said they regarded the idea as bizarre, as soldiers were not trained to deal with gangsters. The Defence Forces currently have a role in providing "aid to the civil power". This includes providing armed escorts alongside the gardai for cash shipments in transit, assisting with security at Portlaoise jail and, if necessary, at other vital installations, and supplying ordnance expertise through the Army bomb squad. Senior gardai pointed out that almost 3,000 members of the force were licensed to carry firearms and were fully trained in their use. The general secretary of the Association of Garda Sergeants and Inspectors, Joe Dirwan said last night his members would be strongly opposed to bringing in the Army. He said this idea had been tried in Northern Ireland and had failed. He was satisfied that the Army would not be in favour of it either.