Overheal wrote: You definitely couldnt get away with bar/pub drinking here: you look under 30 and they ID. and theyre damn strict. Went to an offy last night with my dad and there was this big sign "Under 30? Have ID ready.
Beckham Tinkling Urchin wrote: what drug 'less harmful' than alcohol?
User45701 wrote: hahahahah what a waste of money on flights and other stuff if no drinkey,
Blush_01 wrote: Surely the consumption of alcohol should be far from a focal point of a night out. The idea that someone is "wasting" their J1 because they're under the legal drinking age is ridiculous! To be really honest, I couldn't care less if people get hammered every night of the week - although I find it depressingly pathetic - as long as they don't brag about it. The fact that you can't remember how you got home last night isn't a funny story, it's frightening.
3) Smoking is chemically addictive, alcohol is not
#Elites wrote: although i do agree with you on the bragging..i hate when people go "oh yeaah i had like 10 pints..i was so locked" like really who the **** cares?
Blush_01 wrote: JC 2K3: If someone has to get so drunk that they can't remember the night out (which the majority of people do) then are they really having fun? Is the fact that you can only remember shards of the night a signifier of a good night out? (I guess that's why amnesiacs have such a great time...) I genuinely cannot grasp how a negative image of frequent, excessive alcohol consumption within society impinges on a persons potential for fun. That negative image isn't preventing people from doing what they want if that's what they want to do, but why pretend to agree that it's an intelligent course of action, if you don't believe it? I have a great night out when not drinking alcohol, despite being out in a pub with other people who are getting drunk. The only difference when I'm heading home is I can see how utterly smashed and helpless lots of people are, how dangerous it is for them to be in that state - simply with a view to getting home safely, if nothing else - and those other people don't recognise how close that taxi came to knocking them down, for example.
Blush_01 wrote: Exactly. If that makes me holier than thou (and I can't see how it does) then I guess I'm happy that I don't need to tell everyone how rat-arsed I was in order to confirm that I had fun on that night out that I can't remember. It's almost as though there's such a lack of confidence in people that they have to compete as drinkers in order to validate themselves. JC 2K3: If someone has to get so drunk that they can't remember the night out (which the majority of people do) then are they really having fun? Is the fact that you can only remember shards of the night a signifier of a good night out? (I guess that's why amnesiacs have such a great time...) I genuinely cannot grasp how a negative image of frequent, excessive alcohol consumption within society impinges on a persons potential for fun. That negative image isn't preventing people from doing what they want if that's what they want to do, but why pretend to agree that it's an intelligent course of action, if you don't believe it? I have a great night out when not drinking alcohol, despite being out in a pub with other people who are getting drunk. The only difference when I'm heading home is I can see how utterly smashed and helpless lots of people are, how dangerous it is for them to be in that state - simply with a view to getting home safely, if nothing else - and those other people don't recognise how close that taxi came to knocking them down, for example.
kevmy wrote: 3) Smoking is chemically addictive, alcohol is not
bluewolf wrote: Yup. They ID'd my mother when we were over there a few years ago.
Overheal wrote: Went to an offy last night with my dad and there was this big sign "Under 30? Have ID ready.
AlmightyCushion wrote: I was watching an American tv show the other day (think it was My name is earl) and he went into a shop where there was a sign saying "We ID everyone under 35" or something like that and I was shocked.
seamus wrote: Ah the Americans are hilarious though. Their work ethic seems to either be "By the book" or "Not at all". My mum was in a restaurant in Boston and asked for a glass if wine. The waitress asked for ID. My Mum is nearly 60. The waitress didn't seem to 'get' the inanity of her request, even if it was company policy. She couldn't understand why my Mum was laughing.
Jonesy3110 wrote: The thing with under 35's being ID'ed doesn't mean you have to be over 35 to drink. Its the same here except I think it's 25. I think if you're over 25 you shouldn't have to produce ID.
5starpool wrote: When I did my J1 in the states (first time I was there) I got asked for ID twice in the whole summer, and one of those was on the first night. I was 21 and was still getting ID'd everywhere here at the time. New york is a hell of a lot more relaxed than the rest of the States in this respect I have since realised. Their policy is pointless, stupid, and over the top, yet I still carry my passport with me everywhere when I am in the states just in case.
We've not got enough imagination to do anything except drink.