Nightwish wrote: So natural that the scale of warming is unprecedented in history. The level of warming that has occured over the past 40 or so years, used to take, 100's of years.
sjones wrote: When did you expect it to arrive? .
sjones wrote: What is it? Are these my feet? Global warming is natural.
thebaz wrote: ideally never
connundrum wrote: Or so they want you to think I wish that weather would just decide what it is though. I like winter to be cold and summer to be warm.. not all this wishy washy business inbetween
sjones wrote: Unprecedented in history? Used to take 100's of years? Our population is massive now. This is one of the major causes of global warming - and that is natural. Scientists want us to go hide in caves, while most of the planet's governments do not give a toss about global warming. Our records don't go back far enough for us to have an accurate overview of exactly what is happening. Who are you to say that the warming we are experiencing is not a normal occurance which happens every 8000 years?
sjones wrote: Scientists want us to go hide in caves, while most of the planet's governments do not give a toss about global warming. Our records don't go back far enough for us to have an accurate overview of exactly what is happening. Who are you to say that the warming we are experiencing is not a normal occurance which happens every 8000 years?
grasshopa wrote: Not exactly natural, the explosion of population came with the discovery of oil. A finite resource. As finite as the glitch in population.
Endurance Man wrote: It only took a drop of 5-8 degrees to trigger the last ice age , what happens when we raise the temp by 5-8 degrees?
thebaz wrote: Driving around Dublin today, I noticed many folk wearing t-shirts only instead of coats !
thebaz wrote: it was 21 degrees Celcius in New York last week
ChRoMe wrote: In regards people saying that the human race is responsible for global warming I can only come to one response.So what?? The earth has been around for millions of years and has many spieces made extinct. Why would the human race be any different.
ChRoMe wrote: Also I think its a bit big headed of the human race to believe that we are capable of destroying the planet. .
ChRoMe wrote: The earth is capable of shaking off the human race like its a dose of the flu.
whiskeyman wrote: It sure is, but it looks very likely that we won't need any help destroying it ourselves.http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6270871.stm
sjones wrote: Global warming is natural.
ChRoMe wrote: I might be being a bit thick (its late and I've had a couple of beers) But I dont understand what your saying here.
biko wrote: And there you have it - sjones is GWB!
Junkyard wrote: I think the root of the problem with global warming is the fact the the so called "experts" are tweaking their figures and basing their figures on wrong information to start with. There was a warm period from AD 950 to 1450 approx. and this has been omitted from the research the UN would have us believe. This warm period was warmer than the warmer period by up to 3 degrees C. From the year 1000, ships were recorded as having sailed in parts of the Arctic where there is a permanent ice-pack now. In 1421, a Chinese Imperial Navy squadron sailed right round the Arctic and found no ice anywhere. It is possible that at that time there was less of an icecap at the North Pole than there is now, particularly in summer and the polar bears survived. Even though there has been a lot of talk about the supposed threat posed by the warmer Arctic, the polar bears are thriving in the current warm period. 11 of the 13 principle known families are prospering as never before. Greenland was actually green at one time, Eric the red named Greenland "Greenland" to encourage Danish settlers, because in his time south-western Greenland was in fact green, no ice whatsoever. Until 1425 it was extensively cultivated when farms were suddenly overrun by permafrost. The Viking agricultural settlements are still under permafrost to this day, a very good indicator that the middle ages were warmer than the present, and that there is little cause for alarm at the current melting of Greenland glaciers because they are very likely to have melted to more than their present extent during the medieval warm period. This medieval warm period was followed by a 300 year little ice age until 1750. At the start of this period the mean temperatures dropped by 1.5 degrees C in 100 years. The coldest period was from 1550 to 1700. Frost fairs were held on the River Thames in London. Not only is this warm period not shown up on the UN's graph of temperature over the past 1000 years, the little ice age is also missing. From 1750, temperatures rose and held steady until the late Victorian era. These temperature fluctuations were not caused by humankind's activities. The 1996 report included a graph illustrating them. By the time of the 2001 report, the UN had eradicated the medieval warm period.The UN's 2001 graph, also know as the "hockey stick" showed that the erasure of the medieval warm period in the 2001 graph had been caused by inappropriate data selection and the incorrect use of statistical methods. The big problem with science is that they are generally funded by governments, and this is world-wide by the way. Its generally agreed that the fundamental equation of State-subsidised science is "No problem equals no funding" The UN's documents occasionally acknowledge the British government's funding. The fact that the central graph of the UN's 2001 report was defective has not had anything like as much attention from the media as the stories of impending disaster which politicians and the UN itself have derived from it. An independent report by statisticians, probably the most devastating scientific criticism yet leveled at the UN on climate change, concluded not only that the UN's 2001 temperature reconstruction had used inappropriate statistical methods and data but also that many of the supporting scientific papers, both before and after the 2001 report, had been written by a small and closely connected group of palaeoclimatologists who effectively dominated their field worldwide and were all intimately linked to the principle author of the UN's 2001 graph. The temperatures we're experiencing at the moment are not exceptional and that the medieval warm period was at least as warm as the present and probably up to 3 degrees C warmer. There's some further info at www.co2science.org and http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/grap.../warm-refs.pdf.
Blue_Lagoon wrote: GWB? Global Warming Bush?
ChRoMe wrote: Also I think its a bit big headed of the human race to believe that we are capable of destroying the planet. The earth is capable of shaking off the human race like its a dose of the flu.
ScumLord wrote: that heartland site looks very biased towards the American view that global warming isn't happening and we can continue poluting.