sullivk wrote: It doesn't really matter, people can drive whatever car they want. Why do people think that learners should drive a 1L car???
Stark wrote: The more I think about, being a boy racer, the chances are he wasn't insured at all.
eireal wrote: Too true,hard enough insuring a skybus with a full licence and some ncb never mind as just a learner,id say it cost a right wedge to do.Then again if you can use a skyline as a daily driver you should have no problems paying big money for insurance
eireal wrote: Is your car gold by any chance? I base it on expierence of a Gtst,with on a good day 20mpg.The car could have done with its own petrol pump in the garden
colm_mcm wrote: I'm pretty sure L plates are used by learners
Sesshoumaru wrote: I wish I had a Skyline when I was learning to drive.
No harm in a learner using a Skyline as long as they have had an appropriate number of lessons and a fully licenced driver with them while driving it.
Stark wrote: Maybe he's a named driver in daddy's car.
seamus wrote: A well known scam by the "Daddy has land" brigade is to tell the insurance company that the skyline has a towbar, and thus insuring it under farm insurance. FBD will do this, for one. Of course, these morons don't realise that the disc on their windscreen is only fit for wiping their arses with.
comanche wrote: Doing driving lesson's in navan a few year back and the next pupil after me turned up in a porshe 911. Needless to say she got out of the porshe and into the instructors yaris. According to the instructor it was the pupil's hubby's car. He is in the car business. Still though I don't think I'd be handing over the keys of my beloved porshe to a learner.... Would love to have seen the testers face if she turned up and did the test in the 911! Shows how messed up the system is that a person can learn to drive in a 911 or skyline!
Stark wrote: Well I'm under 25 and I reckon if I was driving at 160km/h in a white skyline which my buddy riding up my ass in a Honda Accord, I probably would fit the definition of a boy racer
eireal wrote: Never heard that one before! It'd be a strange sight seeing a skyline with a hitch on it too!
Chonker wrote: Assumptions are the mother of all .... cant remember the rest
colm_mcm wrote: I'm just amazed that the driver could get insurance, even a tame Skyline is nigh on impossible to cover.
bennyc wrote: Yis wont believe this but here goes. Just built a house and most if not all of the guys working there were under 25 from what I seen for the year there was on the street M3 (insured as a 316) Integra Type R (insured as normal integra) Civic Type R (insured as a 1.4) Supra dodgy insurance disk from a corolla. I couldnt get it trough to them that non of their cars are insured and they could well end up in jail if they hit anyone and anything happened.
Wazdakka wrote: Generally id agree, But in all fairness its a reasnable assumption... I mean if it was a focus with blacked out windows, full bodykit and an exhaust you could loose a basketball in speeding down the motorway id have more doubt that it was a boy racer. But a Skyline? A Skyline is the holy grail and wet dream of most boy racers all rolled into one. You can buy an online kit specifically designed to bring a stock skyline to 1000bhp (or so they claim). The car is imported just because of its outragous acceleration and speed... Its not exactly what youd call a practical car or a runabout to get mom down the shops.
Chonker wrote: Lets assume? he was under 25 and also lets assume his speed was 160k and not say 140k or a bit less, also lets assume he was overtaking a slower driver no disrespect dublin writer, and lets also assume the man driving the honda was doing likewise. Would he still be a boy racer? Fill in the blanks dublinwriter and take us away from assumptions. Its always the same starts off with a comment about a fast car being driven fast and ends up. BOY RACER DID THIS...