awhir wrote: whats the ee
PogMoThoin wrote: :rolleyes: Post some benchies @ stock 2 compare. i'm not oc'ing for while.
BadCharlie wrote: I'd be intrested to see if the new intel chip improves FPS in games by much over the AMD. Dont care about folding, ripping or 3d stuff just games is what matters for me.
Richard Dower wrote: Can i just add that i have two new generation WD Raptors in RAID 0, 16MB cache, X-Fi, SATA DVD-RW.......... :-) And a crappy ATI X550, but i'm holding out for a Direct X 10 GPU!!
TomCo wrote: Yeah but enthusiasts care about performance not value.
If enthusiasts cared about value the FX series wouldn't exist nor would the EE series or the GTX series.
SyxPak wrote: I don't agree. "Performance at any cost" is not an option for the majority of computer enthusiasts. Overclocking/Tweaking was born out of trying to get more performance for little or no extra money. Not every enthusiast has a grand to splurge on a chip that won't be worth half that in 6-9 months. The performance-per-euro metric is more important to more enthusiasts. Why spend 100% more money for a 10-15% performance increase when you can just spend the difference on better components and overclock a slower chip - thereby ending up with a better overall system forthe same or less money.