StJimmy wrote: Harsh. I've no problem with it, really.
Ag marbh wrote: Someone named after a Greenday song wouldnt
Lint wrote: Ag Marbh why dont you shut the F*U*C*K up Im getting sick of hearing your opinions
Anarchist wrote: Lol that is class
StJimmy wrote: Look what you're named after, I mean ''Anarchist''. Grow up.
Anarchist wrote: (14:05:05) (@Dregin) Janer-: hah stJimmy slagging you on boards (14:05:13) (@Janer-) lol (14:05:20) (@Janer-) i don't take them too seriously there tbh (14:05:20) (@Janer-) cos (14:05:22) (@Janer-) 1)kids (14:05:31) (@Janer-) 2)central bank type "punks" (14:05:42) (@Janer-) link plz (14:05:50) (@Dregin) http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2054907607 (14:05:55) (@Janer-) and i'll SMASH HIS ****ING HEAD IN *@#*!
skapunkkeith wrote: omg, this whole wats punk and wat isnt is pure crap, if you dont like a band dont go out of your way to try and put down sumone who does like them, none of you know wat punk is, its about doing ur own thing, and theres no such thing as a pure punk, i cant be defined like that, if u dont like the buzzcocks, y would u cum into a thread like this and say you dont like them, anyone who leads a punk kife shouldnt care so ur post is just useless, just grow the **** up already, punk is whatever you make it but one thing its not is a genre, dont put bands in genres, its a ****in joke the way you carry on, a band plays music if u dont like then thats ur problem, and for **** sake dont be ashamed of liking a band, the buzzcocks, are great, i missed the show but im sure it was great
skapunkkeith wrote: im not saying that but when people go out of their way to put someone down cos of teir taste its stupid, punk cant be defined by one person, cos its about doing ur own thing, apart ofpunk is not caring about wat others think but thats not me trying to define thats just a part of the whole attitude
Anarchist wrote: No Keith what we were getting at was continous pushing of non Punk gigs, this is a Punk forum, there are other forums for diff music. I like the Buzzcocks if u had have read my reply properly what I am against is **** venues.... And Frank 900 bodies? Plenty of money made for the "promoter" so. I still say 2 nights in the voodoo would have added more to their credibility but at this stage of their career it's all about money and making it in as much a small time as possible. Like I said Buzzcocks were at their peak between 76-79
melekalikimaka wrote: yrt again thats the attitude not the genre,i'm sure if there is a problem google 'what genre is x band' saves everyone alot a hassle. i think alot of people have issues with pop punk, it always turns nasty with pop punk, its still punk so it should go here, if ya dont like a thread theres no need to say it, let it slide you angry angry people
Ag marbh wrote: Pop punk is wrongfully named. The word punk shouldnt be included into it whatsoever because it's not punk!