dbnavan wrote: Very sore finger tonight straped it up myself, but question is would everyone have reacted the same way, I can hardly hold to company or driver to blame for avoiding killing someone even if they were an idiot. People have claimed for less.
Draupnir wrote: You should have gone to the hospital or at least mad a complaint to the driver. If your finger is mangled now then you have no comeback since you made no complaint or report.
dbnavan wrote: Complain over what? The fact that he hurt my finger over instead of kill someone? Gone to hospital to add to the 337 tonight in our causulty wards and maybe wait 6/7 to do something i could do myself?
junkyard wrote: Does it have seat belts? Do you have to stand if there are no seats available? If this is the case there could be safety implications.
junkyard wrote: Fair play to you for not making a big deal out of it. Not being from Dublin or having seen the Luas close up only what I've seen on T.V. I'm surprised there hasn't been more accidents than there have been. Does it have seat belts? Do you have to stand if there are no seats available? If this is the case there could be safety implications.
Slutmonkey57b wrote: It's not like the extra 30 seconds is going to be spent shagging supermodels, is it?
Lodgepole wrote: Fair play to you, most people wouldn't have the decency to accept it as an accident. I don't know if drivers have to report incidents like that, but it may have been worthwhile asking him to make note of it officially.
Slutmonkey57b wrote: I think it should be illegal for luas drivers to brake for pedestrians. Anyone stupid enough to hop out in front of a tram to save themselves 30 seconds deserves whatever they get. It's not like the extra 30 seconds is going to be spent shagging supermodels, is it?
Fighting Irish wrote: :rolleyes: he should have at least being brought to the hospital
I only read the bolded part and didn't read anymore
Nietzschean wrote: Why? he obviously didn't feel the need......... As pointed out they are a bit on the over-crowded side already...
Very sore finger tonight straped it up myself
Nietzschean wrote: Short attention span? It might be somewhat OTT(and intentionally so) , but the sentiment is right, certainly should be some sort of offence legally to be doing it.
I think it should be illegal for luas drivers to brake for pedestrians
Lodgepole wrote: Why should he have gone to hospital? Even if he had broken his finger, a broken finger isn't worth taking up a place in a the A&E for. And the over the top statement about running over pedestrians is nonsense, even the sentiment. Accidents happen. There's a thousand different reasons why somebody may find themselves accidentally in front of a car or LUAS.
Lodgepole wrote: Why should he have gone to hospital? Even if he had broken his finger, a broken finger isn't worth taking up a place in a the A&E for. .
WhiteWashMan wrote: i would consider a broken finger worth taking up a place in A&E by the way. especially if it is caused by someone else.
Fighting Irish wrote: Illegal for a lus driver to brake for pedestrians!!!! Would you be happy if it was made ILLEGAL for car drivers to brake for pedestrians?
TomTom wrote: I think the luas is great but some people out there need to have darwins theory forcefully applied to them.
dbnavan wrote: A few years back while teaching in a school I decided to play soccer with some of the lads in PE to even up the team, during this I injured my wrist, bad sprain and because it was a work related injury I had to go the hospital for insurance purposes. I sat from 2.30 til 9 that night waiting for a doctor to look at an xray which was taken about say 5.30. He eventually told me yes its just a sprain, wrap it up nothing we can do, only reason I went on this occasion as I said, it was work related. Wasn't going to take up another casualty spot yesterday just for the sake of it, IMO even if I had broken my arm or whatever, why should LUAS be responsible they didn't intend to see me hurt, the driver did nothing wrong, the whole meaning of accident seems to be forgotten in society when there might be a chance of a claim. I remember years ago my grandfather was knocked down because he was standing in the middle of a road and crossing over when he stepped backwards to let a car by and was hit from a car behind. anyway the driver accepted responsibility and by grandfather said "don't be silly man, it was my own bloody fault, i don't want your money". If more people took this attitude insurance costs would be so much lower. That is not to say I would never claim off someone but there would have to be a strong reason and a non beneficial financial gain.
WhiteWashMan wrote: if i was injured in an accident, i would go to the hospital. what you feel is right or wrong has nothing to do with it. if theres an injury, why wouldnt you get it looked at? at what point do you consider an injury serious enough to warrant a wait in A&E?
Ruaidhri wrote: Quite happy! Actually, I'd invest in bull-bars. Something from my childhood is coming back to me..something about looking left,right,left,right,forwards,backwards before attempting to cross a road.
Lodgepole wrote: The anonymous world of the internet is a wonderful place to make such statements.
Utter ****e is what it is. As though every pedestrian killed in a road accident is killed as a result of their own misconduct on the road. Have you ever lost an aquaintance in such a way? If so, do you hold them in the same regard?