Hobbes wrote: You couldn't possibly save me some time and direct link to the figures in question? Cheers. Those are figures I have kept note of from various reports in the Indo and Irish Times from the last few years. Check them out yourself. U'll find they are accurate e.g. the housing waiting list figure comes from the Dept of the Environment. Hobbes wrote: Btw your irish child estimation is bunk as well. Was discussed in depth during the referendum and the ruling of staying in Ireland on having an Irish child was overturned well before people voted on it. How is it bunk. 10,000 people were given leave to remain here before the referendum and the law was changed. Since then, and this was mentioned by MvDowell just before xmas, 18,000 further people who have had children here have been given leave to remain in a ridiculous amnesty. Hobbes wrote: And how do you get 80% from a 6% figure? Very simple if u really read what I said. Only 6% of asylum seekers on average are succesful in their initial application. A further 15% win their appeals. But because so many asylum seekers have been allowed remain because of the irish-born baby scenarion, well over 80% of all original asylum seekers have been allowed remain on in ireland. Hobbes wrote: AFAIR our having to take on Asylum seekers is an EU directive. The Dublin Convention also originates from the EU and is 1 of the most recent on the subject of asylum. It states that all asylum seekers to the EU must apply for asylum in the first country they arrive in....ever been to Dublin airport? ever seen direct flights from lagos?
Hobbes wrote: Btw your irish child estimation is bunk as well. Was discussed in depth during the referendum and the ruling of staying in Ireland on having an Irish child was overturned well before people voted on it. How is it bunk. 10,000 people were given leave to remain here before the referendum and the law was changed. Since then, and this was mentioned by MvDowell just before xmas, 18,000 further people who have had children here have been given leave to remain in a ridiculous amnesty. Hobbes wrote: And how do you get 80% from a 6% figure? Very simple if u really read what I said. Only 6% of asylum seekers on average are succesful in their initial application. A further 15% win their appeals. But because so many asylum seekers have been allowed remain because of the irish-born baby scenarion, well over 80% of all original asylum seekers have been allowed remain on in ireland. Hobbes wrote: AFAIR our having to take on Asylum seekers is an EU directive. The Dublin Convention also originates from the EU and is 1 of the most recent on the subject of asylum. It states that all asylum seekers to the EU must apply for asylum in the first country they arrive in....ever been to Dublin airport? ever seen direct flights from lagos?
Hobbes wrote: And how do you get 80% from a 6% figure? Very simple if u really read what I said. Only 6% of asylum seekers on average are succesful in their initial application. A further 15% win their appeals. But because so many asylum seekers have been allowed remain because of the irish-born baby scenarion, well over 80% of all original asylum seekers have been allowed remain on in ireland. Hobbes wrote: AFAIR our having to take on Asylum seekers is an EU directive. The Dublin Convention also originates from the EU and is 1 of the most recent on the subject of asylum. It states that all asylum seekers to the EU must apply for asylum in the first country they arrive in....ever been to Dublin airport? ever seen direct flights from lagos?
Hobbes wrote: AFAIR our having to take on Asylum seekers is an EU directive. The Dublin Convention also originates from the EU and is 1 of the most recent on the subject of asylum. It states that all asylum seekers to the EU must apply for asylum in the first country they arrive in....ever been to Dublin airport? ever seen direct flights from lagos?
Delboy05 wrote: Those are figures I have kept note of from various reports in the Indo and Irish Times from the last few years.
Check them out yourself. U'll find they are accurate e.g. the housing waiting list figure comes from the Dept of the Environment.
How is it bunk.
Very simple if u really read what I said. Only 6% of asylum seekers on average are succesful in their initial application. A further 15% win their appeals. But because so many asylum seekers have been allowed remain because of the irish-born baby scenarion, well over 80% of all original asylum seekers have been allowed remain on in ireland.
The Dublin Convention also originates from the EU and is 1 of the most recent on the subject of asylum. It states that all asylum seekers to the EU must apply for asylum in the first country they arrive in....ever been to Dublin airport? ever seen direct flights from lagos?
stevejazzx wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenophobia There is an older generation of Irsih people who are pushing the agenda of racial hatred in this country. Thankfully a higher percentage of the current generation of Irish peole prefer to have more informed and logical stance when dealing with these complex worldly issues. All this talk etc of free cars and prams only exposes the fear and ignorance of people. There is balance of government welfare between the peoples of this state which may be bureaucratic but certainly not more benificial for foreigners as Illustrated by hoobes herehttp://www.amnesty.ie/content/view/full/764/ The world is beautiful place because we are a diverse multicultural people.
Delboy05 wrote: The Dublin Convention also originates from the EU and is 1 of the most recent on the subject of asylum. It states that all asylum seekers to the EU must apply for asylum in the first country they arrive in....ever been to Dublin airport? ever seen direct flights from lagos?
Shock_treatment wrote: That one just p*sses me off. The same scam artist neighbours of mine have 5 children here, and another 3 in Romania. Two of the children here they have false Irish birth certs for, and claiming for. I wouldnt say this on here, unless I know this to be true. Im sick and feckin tired of hearing the poor asylum seekers rant. He was buying and cars like nobodys business.. let me tell you they know how to turn tricks. if there was money to be made, the sniffed it out. At night he sent the missus out selling flowers in the pubs and clubs. I thought I was fcukin seeing things when I opened a window at the back of the house, and their back garden was like old mac donalds farm. there was feckin hens everywhere.. they were sellin eggs out at the market. As if they werent given enough. now this one makes me sick.. whenever there was a day where charity bags would be full of clothes at peoples gateways ready for collection.. he would send the 3 yr old out pushing a buggy collecting them, then come round the back of the house - he took the bags off him and sent the young lad off again.Thats not even the half of the scams. Im most certainly not racist, but I'm not about to root for them here.
Shock_treatment wrote: Two of the children here they have false Irish birth certs for, and claiming for. I wouldnt say this on here, unless I know this to be true.
Im sick and feckin tired of hearing the poor asylum seekers rant. He was buying and cars like nobodys business..
Hobbes wrote: If you know it to be true why don't you report them to the police then?
Hobbes wrote: Thats good. When you read those stories did you then go look up the figures to see if they were correct or not? You really should. I don't have the time now but I will go rummaging if you can't. If you have never looked for the actual figures how can you make that assertion. I'll go look anyway. I really don't think the Indo and the Times make this stuff up....in fact, The Irish Times is very sympathetic to aslyum seekers in Ireland and very rarely publishes a bad news story on them. The facts and figures they quote come from Govt or Refugee council reports usually.....do u believe no one except the asylum seekers themselves? Hobbes wrote: Go to the biki, look up threads of fame and then look at the referendum thread. Its huge but goes into detail why the "Get an Irish Baby and you get to stay here" is BS and has been for some time. There was a court case afair 1-2 years before the referendum that meant that having a kid here didn't automatically give you free rights to stay here. I am well aware that the govt stopped taking in claims for irish-born children before the refereundum- where do you think the backlog built up, that led to the amnesty we've just had coming into play. It was 10,000 before the claims were stopped, and 18,000 since in the amnesty....FACT. Hobbes wrote: 15% + 6% = 80% Sorry just doesn't add up. Do you have an exact figure of how many won thier case based on a child? (you will probably find it in the referendum thread). Again I ask you to look at what I wrote....A very small number of asylum seekers win their cases to stay here. But because so many failed cases have had irish-born children, over 80% of all the original applicants have remained on in Ireland whether their original case was won or lost. Can u not understand that? Hobbes wrote: Read up on it again. Yes they have to register at the first country but it also states that each member country must take on a certain amount of Asylum seekers even if they are not the first country they entered in on. Actually Ireland has the lowest (or near lowest) number of asylum seekers in Europe. If they did register at the first country they entered, we'd be taking in quotas from Holland, France etc, as we'd have a duty under EU law to do so. In fact we're not doing this, as so many apply directly to ireland...why would u come via France/Germany etc to a small island on the western edges of europe....what would attract u here i wonder????? In 2003, 25% of all nigerians who claimed asylum in western countries (EU, USA, Australia etc) did so in Ireland (source UNHCR)...........are we the former colonial power in Nigeria???? Do we have some historic links to nigeria???? Tell me, Hobbes, why do so many nigerians choose Ireland........
Hobbes wrote: Go to the biki, look up threads of fame and then look at the referendum thread. Its huge but goes into detail why the "Get an Irish Baby and you get to stay here" is BS and has been for some time. There was a court case afair 1-2 years before the referendum that meant that having a kid here didn't automatically give you free rights to stay here. I am well aware that the govt stopped taking in claims for irish-born children before the refereundum- where do you think the backlog built up, that led to the amnesty we've just had coming into play. It was 10,000 before the claims were stopped, and 18,000 since in the amnesty....FACT. Hobbes wrote: 15% + 6% = 80% Sorry just doesn't add up. Do you have an exact figure of how many won thier case based on a child? (you will probably find it in the referendum thread). Again I ask you to look at what I wrote....A very small number of asylum seekers win their cases to stay here. But because so many failed cases have had irish-born children, over 80% of all the original applicants have remained on in Ireland whether their original case was won or lost. Can u not understand that? Hobbes wrote: Read up on it again. Yes they have to register at the first country but it also states that each member country must take on a certain amount of Asylum seekers even if they are not the first country they entered in on. Actually Ireland has the lowest (or near lowest) number of asylum seekers in Europe. If they did register at the first country they entered, we'd be taking in quotas from Holland, France etc, as we'd have a duty under EU law to do so. In fact we're not doing this, as so many apply directly to ireland...why would u come via France/Germany etc to a small island on the western edges of europe....what would attract u here i wonder????? In 2003, 25% of all nigerians who claimed asylum in western countries (EU, USA, Australia etc) did so in Ireland (source UNHCR)...........are we the former colonial power in Nigeria???? Do we have some historic links to nigeria???? Tell me, Hobbes, why do so many nigerians choose Ireland........
Hobbes wrote: 15% + 6% = 80% Sorry just doesn't add up. Do you have an exact figure of how many won thier case based on a child? (you will probably find it in the referendum thread). Again I ask you to look at what I wrote....A very small number of asylum seekers win their cases to stay here. But because so many failed cases have had irish-born children, over 80% of all the original applicants have remained on in Ireland whether their original case was won or lost. Can u not understand that? Hobbes wrote: Read up on it again. Yes they have to register at the first country but it also states that each member country must take on a certain amount of Asylum seekers even if they are not the first country they entered in on. Actually Ireland has the lowest (or near lowest) number of asylum seekers in Europe. If they did register at the first country they entered, we'd be taking in quotas from Holland, France etc, as we'd have a duty under EU law to do so. In fact we're not doing this, as so many apply directly to ireland...why would u come via France/Germany etc to a small island on the western edges of europe....what would attract u here i wonder????? In 2003, 25% of all nigerians who claimed asylum in western countries (EU, USA, Australia etc) did so in Ireland (source UNHCR)...........are we the former colonial power in Nigeria???? Do we have some historic links to nigeria???? Tell me, Hobbes, why do so many nigerians choose Ireland........
Hobbes wrote: Read up on it again. Yes they have to register at the first country but it also states that each member country must take on a certain amount of Asylum seekers even if they are not the first country they entered in on. Actually Ireland has the lowest (or near lowest) number of asylum seekers in Europe. If they did register at the first country they entered, we'd be taking in quotas from Holland, France etc, as we'd have a duty under EU law to do so. In fact we're not doing this, as so many apply directly to ireland...why would u come via France/Germany etc to a small island on the western edges of europe....what would attract u here i wonder????? In 2003, 25% of all nigerians who claimed asylum in western countries (EU, USA, Australia etc) did so in Ireland (source UNHCR)...........are we the former colonial power in Nigeria???? Do we have some historic links to nigeria???? Tell me, Hobbes, why do so many nigerians choose Ireland........
Shock_treatment wrote: That would only be a drop in the ocean. There are a hell of a lot more of them getting away with it than them. Whats the bloody point.
Delboy05 wrote: T I really don't think the Indo and the Times make this stuff up
The facts and figures they quote come from Govt or Refugee council reports usually.....do u believe no one except the asylum seekers themselves?
Again I ask you to look at what I wrote....A very small number of asylum seekers win their cases to stay here. But because so many failed cases have had irish-born children, over 80% of all the original applicants have remained on in Ireland whether their original case was won or lost. Can u not understand that?
Hobbes wrote: If they did register at the first country they entered, we'd be taking in quotas from Holland, France etc, as we'd have a duty under EU law to do so. In fact we're not doing this,
Delboy05 wrote: http://www.unhcr.ch/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/statistics/opendoc.pdf?tbl=STATISTICS&id=41d2c18f0&page=statistics In 2003, ,19,308 nigrians claimed asylum in 'industrialized' nations according to the UNHCR report above. 3,110 did so in ireland and, for example, 1,225 did so in france.
stevejazzx wrote: just in case you were wondering i left out the word not after the word certainly first time around, i have edited now
Delboy05 wrote: If you are genuinely in fear of your live, you'll claim asylum as soon as you can....end of story.
Delboy05 wrote: It is impossble to have a rational argument with you - I quoted 2003 as i knew the figures for that year. I point you to a UN report which backs me up.
How is it less than 1/3 of the number I have stated!!!!!
flogen wrote: So what you're telling me is this; It's common knowledge that asylum seekers get free fancy stuff like prams, so common that people like you know about it without having to do any research at all.
Ardent wrote: My father was telling me of a lady he knows who went to buy a pram in the Buy & Sell. She called around to the house and it turned out to be a non-national with a room full of prams for sale.
Ardent wrote: My father was telling me of a lady he knows who went to buy a pram in the Buy & Sell. She called around to the house and it turned out to be a non-national with a room full of prams for sale. I've also heard the free car story before many times and I have no reason not to believe it. Do some of the replies on this thread confirming it not make you wonder...?
Ardent wrote: I've also heard the free car story before many times and I have no reason not to believe it. Do some of the replies on this thread confirming it not make you wonder...?
My father was telling me of a lady he knows who went to buy a pram in the Buy & Sell. She called around to the house and it turned out to be a non-national with a room full of prams for sale.
Hobbes wrote: True or not, who knows. But how does he know she got them from social welfare?
Shock_treatment wrote: Seeing as you will toy with the notion - If not the social welfare, then where?
Hobbes wrote: Wholesaler? ..her getting a room full of prams off the social welfare. And what is a roomful of prams? 1,2, 50 ?
MorningStar wrote: A friends sister married a Nigerian guy and if you want anny stolen goods he is the man to see. The big thing with him was shopping vouchers bought on stolen credit cards so I maybe he moved into prams.
jerryadams wrote: I'd love if someone out there could shed light on this. I just learned about it this evening and can't say whether it's true or not. Apparently, foreign nationals are given cars if claim they are being harrassed on public transport. The social welfare is said to be sending out those who claim continued racial abuse on public transport, to select a car (within a budget of course) from a dealer whereupon they will tax and insure it for 3 months, and the new owner must then take over these overheads after this time. The person who told me seemed to know a great deal about it, and it's supposed to be common knowledge among the immigrant community. Is there anyone out there who works in the social, or who knows more about this, that would be in a position to confirm or deny the above?