angry_fox wrote: I was told a man was seriously injured last wednesday becasue he jumped on to a lorry at Oxygen and then fell off it at the tower, lost his legs and then died. I honestly can not belive this, was he a student in the college?
c - 13 wrote: X-mas day in the college and large amounts of alcohol are being given the blame for the whole thing and the college director was on the news the other day giving out about it and so on.
Freddie59 wrote: I know you can't stop students from drinking altogether, but I for one think it's absolutely ridiculous to have a pub open during student (daytime) hours on a third-level campus. It makes absolutely no sense at all. Time to review it all methinks.
angry_fox wrote: Students Union would go nuts about that...... but something should be done, maybe the dome should be opened later on christmas day in the college but doubt it would make any difference.......
merlante wrote: You're totally wrong here. Why shouldn't a student be able to socialise and have a quiet, civilised pint during the day. The bar staff aren't supposed to serve you by law if you've had too much to drink -- that's supposed to be the law. How many accidents and crazy incidents happen during the daytime, anyway? The government and others in this country seem to be under the impression that Irish people are wanton drunks who will never be able to control themselves around alcohol and therefore the only way we can clamp down on drunkeness and rowdy behaviour is to restrict our access to drink. This is total bollox, as although it may reduce such behaviour by reducing the supply of drink, IT DOES NOT educate people on the risks of drink and IT DOES NOT try to promulgate a more responsible attitude to alcohol consumption. The quicker we get rid of all supply constraints on alcohol and force people to learn how to drink responsibly, the quicker the Irish drink problem will be solved. Shuffling opening hours around will not reduce the number of alcoholics and will not breed any healthy drinking patterns. Unfortunately the term "Nanny State" has been hijacked by the smoking lobby, but there is no better term to describe what is going on regarding drinking legislation in this country. It's only a matter of time before you get your wish and there are no bars on college campuses -- where will they disappear from next? (not the Dail anyway!)
c - 13 wrote: Everyone has a slightly different story on this, but no-one seems to know the truth. Not to start a game of chinese whispers here but this is what I heard. The person in question came out of the bowery and there was a cattle truck stopped at the lights at the tower, the guy hopped onto the coupling between the cab and the trailer, the van moved out from the lights and the guy fel in between the trailer and cab and under the wheels, he was taken to ardkeen, is still alive but has lost/is going to lose one of his legs. X-mas day in the college and large amounts of alcohol are being given the blame for the whole thing and the college director was on the news the other day giving out about it and so on. To be honest i'm not surprised something happened to someone considering the state that some people were in on wednesday. I went into the dome at around 3 wednesday afternoon and the amount of people who couldnt stand up was unreal, all of whom were all full of plans to head into town that night.
c - 13 wrote: I dont think the dome is owned by the students union anymore though, as far as I know someone bought it up during the summer (hence the refurbishment) because theres a guy (who i presume is the owner) who often walks around the bar talking to the students asking if theyre enjoying themselves/ opinions on the bands playing etc.
Sully04 wrote: Im sure iv pissed people of by saying this, and im sure ill get flammed back and abuse thrown at me. Im entitled to my opinion and your entitled to yours. Im not gonna flame you, so dont flame me k
Freddie59 wrote: I think your reply has highlighted adequately the need to impose such a ban. Instead of prioritising the reason the student is there in the first instance (ie to be educated) you prioritise that the pub should not be closed. You ask how many incidents happen during the day? Would you not agree that carrying a day's drinking over to night-time is not very wise?
Freddie59 wrote: Students (and my own child is in third level) appear incapable of controlling their alcohol intake by themselves, so the 'nanny state' would appear to need to step in. I have no problem with a student having a sociable pint during the day, but I have a major problem with, as appears to be the case with some, students spending hours in an on-campus pub when they're supposed to be in class.:eek:
Freddie59 wrote: All you have to do is to take a trip down Waterford City Centre any Wednesday night, and you will see the students behave like ten year-olds on a drink-fuelled frenzy.
Freddie59 wrote: Have you spared a thought, not just for that poor student that was injured, but the lorry driver who has to carry this with him for the rest of his life through no fault of his own? Is getting locked really that important to you? There is so much access to drink in this country it's unbelieveable - and the current youth, unfortunately, appear to be turning into clones of our near neighbours across the pond....and mimic their yobbish behaviour into the bargain.
Freddie59 wrote: And that is the most worrying aspect of it. Irish people are recognised throughout the world for their good nature, even when under the influence. However, this appears to be changing radically and rapidly. Something needs to be done. You have to remove the temptation. I think closing bars on campus (at least from 9 to 5) is a start.:mad:
Freddie59 wrote: AFAIK I don't think the chap's dead. He is very critical in Cork at the minute. But - hey - let's not rush to criticise. Think of his family. We've all done stupid things we're not proud of and we shouldn't really comment unless we know the circumstances. Pause, think of him, and say a prayer for him given the season that's in it.:(
merlante wrote: Thus there will be times during the day when they are free, and times during the evening when they are studying or doing an assignment, i.e. not free. Why shouldn't a student, who is an adult like the rest of us, not be entitled to a pint during his/her free time? Be it during the day or during the evening.
Rollo Tamasi wrote: are you off your game or what? How many professionals do you see in the pub drinking while on their lunch break. Do you see Gaurds drinking tinnies on their breaks, firemen? lawyers? The kids are there to get educated not to be in the pub a hour a day and then get re-educateded. Having an hours break in the middle of a 9 hours day is NOT FREE TIME!!!. Do you honestly think you will learn much when you have the taste for drink inside you? I think that the Dome should not be allowed to serve alcohol during the day full stop. The college is full of impressionable young people who will gladly sit on their arse instead of attending classes.
c - 13 wrote: Well the bouncers at the dome definatly werent doing anything about the crowds of drunk peple there on wens, I was out for a smoke on one particular occassion (around 4 - 4.30 ish) and a girl came staggering out past us, slumped up against the wall, attempted to make a phone call, then staggered straight back in past the bouncers again who didnt even bat an eyelid. I thought it was the bouncers responsibility not to allow intoxicated people back in ? I mean this girl was far past drunk, and keeping in mind that girl who was raped on christmas day last year I would have thought that they would be extra vigilant this year. Oh well, wonder what can be done to top that one next year. :rolleyes:
OLDYELLAR wrote: I couldnt believe her friends left her off on her own in that state , the girl could barely walk like , stupidity getting in that state and then walking home alone.
merlante wrote: From what I've read on here, it's just as well the rabble aren't on charge of colleges/universities, or all social activities would be banned and they'd all become large, glorified secondary schools. :mad:
Freddie59 wrote: I have to agree. It's amazing that through second level, discpline is applied across the board. Students go to third level, where they should be preparing for the responsibilities on Industtrial life with all it's hazards. Instead of this they are allowed do what they like. Now, while the majority can act as adults and behave, there are a small minority who will never grow up.
merlante wrote: Where to start? You seem to have a major problem with the idea of college education. You cannot teach degrees (in particular) in a secondary school, rote learning sort of way. Knowledge must be assimilated gradually over the years in order to build up the proper depth of understanding. Having a non-pressurised and freeform but generally engaging environment allows this to happen. You can't spoon feed degrees, or at least not the best grades or the best degrees. And yes, socialising helps! The vast majority of students go through college, pass their exams, and become useful members of society: what exactly is your problem?
angry_fox wrote: In all fairness people, maybe students need to be better educated about alcohol. No use handing out leaflets or putting up posters, students won’t take any notice and most don’t care either. Often when i was in college, people were telling me how much they drank the night before and how hung over they were, it was if they were boasting about it, it was an achievement to them. I still see this today when im in work, but its always the lads who are about 18/19. So it’s not just students, its young people in general, its there attitude towards drink, that’s what needs to changed, not the closing of the Dome during the day or the banning of Christmas day...... Does anyone have any more news on the lad who was in the accident?